Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detecting removed attributes in the cyber system for smart manufacturing

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the concept of edge computing, some service and data should be moved from the centralized data server to the data source for enhancing the computational efficiency especially for real-time applications, e.g., production monitoring. In the manufacturing industries, most of the data sources are equipment. Deploying the application programming interface (API) services near the data source is the common solution. However, keeping the consistency of the production configuration between API servers and the manufacturing data center with minimum resource is a critical problem in terms of the computational efficiency and the speed of response. In this paper, we propose the partition and pass (PnP) mechanism to synchronize the production line settings saved in the API servers with that in the data center. From the analysis results, we show that the approximation ratio is 2 compared with current solutions including the time-based approach and the counter-based approach. It means that the proposed PnP only needs one half computing cost to finish the same number of products with that required by current solutions. Based on the simulation results, the PnP only requires 31% computation time to finish the synchronization process which matches the analysis results. Moreover, we provide a case study to show that the proposed PnP captures more events than current solutions. In other words, applying PnP in the production line will increase the computation performance to synchronize the production configuration between API servers and data center in saving manufacturing data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rüßmann M, Lorenz M, Gerbert P, Waldner M, Justus J, Engel P, Harnisch M (2015) Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consult Group 9:54–89

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Ind Sci Eng 8(1):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vichare NM, Pecht MG (2006) Prognostics and health management of electronics. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 29(1):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B, Werner F, Ivanova M (2016) A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory industry 4.0. Int J Prod Res 54(2):386–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Zhang G, Liu Y, Hu D (2017) Research on services encapsulation and virtualization access model of machine for cloud manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 28(5):1109–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He N, Zhang DZ, Li Q (2014) Agent-based hierarchical production planning and scheduling in make-to-order manufacturing system. Int J Prod Econ 149:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu Z (2017) The analytics and applications on supporting big data framework in wireless surveillance networks. Int J Soc Humanist Comput 2(3–4):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodrigues A, Pinheiro PR, Rodrigues MM, Albuquerque AB, Gonçalves FM (2010) Applying a multicriteria model for selection of test use cases: a use of experience. Int J Soc Humanist Comput 1(3):246–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thames L, Schaefer D (2016) Software-defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 52:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wan J, Tang S, Shu Z, Li D, Wang S, Imran M, Vasilakos AV (2016) Software-defined industrial internet of things in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Sens J 16(20):7373–7380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roblek V, Meško M, Krapež A (2016) A complex view of industry 4.0. Sage Open 6(2):2158244016653987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Posada J, Toro C, Barandiaran I, Oyarzun D, Stricker D, De Amicis R, Pinto E, Eisert P, Dollner J, Vallarino I (2015) Visual computing as a key enabling technology for industrie 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 35(2):26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kreutz D, Ramos FM, Verissimo PE, Rothenberg CE, Azodolmolky S, Uhlig S (2015) Software-defined networking: a comprehensive survey. Proc IEEE 103(1):14–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thereska E, Ballani H, O’Shea G, Karagiannis T, Rowstron A, Talpey T, Black R, Zhu T (2013) IOFlow: a software-defined storage architecture. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. ACM, pp 182–196

  16. Tsung CK, Yen CT, Wu WF (2018) A software defined-based hybrid cloud for the design of smart micro-manufacturing system. Microsyst Technol 24(10):4329–4340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olston C, Widom J (2002) Best-effort cache synchronization with source cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, pp 73–84

  18. Nguyen QM (2016) Synchronization in timestamp-based cache coherence protocols. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  19. Yates RD, Ciblat P, Yener A, Wigger M (2017) Age-optimal constrained cache updating. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). IEEE, pp 141–145

  20. Katta N, Alipourfard O, Rexford J, Walker D (2014) Infinite cacheflow in software-defined networks. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking. ACM, pp 175–180

  21. Katta N, Alipourfard O, Rexford J, Walker D (2016) Cacheflow: dependency-aware rule-caching for software-defined networks. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on SDN Research. ACM, p 6

  22. Feige U (1998) A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J ACM 45(4):634–652

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Moshref M, Yu M, Sharma AB, Govindan R (2013) Scalable rule management for data centers. In: NSDI, vol 13, pp 157–170

  24. Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu L (2016) Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 3(5):637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Kun Tsung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yen, CT., Tsung, CK. & Wu, WF. Detecting removed attributes in the cyber system for smart manufacturing. J Supercomput 76, 6280–6301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02809-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02809-6

Keywords

Navigation