Optimal feature-based multi-kernel SVM approach for thyroid disease classification


Thyroid diseases are across the board around the world. In India as well, there is a critical issue caused because of this disease. Different research studies estimate that around 42 million individuals in India suffer from the ill effects of “thyroid diseases.” Diagnosis of health situations is an energetic and testing undertaking in the field of therapeutic science. Our proposed model is to classify this thyroid data utilizing optimal feature selection and kernel-based classifier process. We will create classifications models and its group show for classification of data using “multi kernel support vector machine.” The novelty and objective of this proposed model as feature selection, it’s used to enhance the performance of classifying process with the help of improved gray wolf optimization. Reason for this optimal feature selection as the insignificant features from unique dataset and computationally increment the performance of the model. The proposed thyroid classification results in the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 97.49, 99.05 and 94.5%, compared to the existing model. This performance measure is computed from the confusion matrix with the diverse measures contrasted with individual models and in addition to the existing classifier and optimization techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5


  1. 1.

    Razia S, Rao N (2016) Machine learning techniques for thyroid disease diagnosis—a review. Indian J Sci Technol 9(28):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Woo N, Kim S-K, Kang SH (2017) Multi-immunoreaction-based dual-color capillary electrophoresis for the enhanced diagnostic reliability of thyroid gland disease. J Chromatogr 1509:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hayashi Y (2017) Synergy effects between grafting and subdivision in Re-RX with J48graft for the diagnosis of thyroid disease. J Knowl Syst 131:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prasad V, Srinivasa Rao T, Surendra Prasad Babu M (2016) Thyroid disease diagnosis via hybrid architecture composing rough data sets theory and machine learning algorithms. J Soft Comput 20(3):1179–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Unnikrishnan AG, Kalra S, Sahay RK, Bantwal G, John M, Tewari N (2017) Prevalence of hypothyroidism in adults: an epidemiological study in eight cities of India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 17(4):647–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gupta D, Julka A, Jain S, Aggarwal T, Khanna A, Albuquerque VHCD (2018) Optimized cuttlefish algorithm for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Cognit Syst Res 52:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kousarrizi N, Seiti F, Teshnehlab M (2012) An experimental comparative study on thyroid disease diagnosis based on feature subset selection and classification. Int J Electr Comput Sci IJECS-IJENS 12(01):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rasitha Banu D (2016) Predicting thyroid disease using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) data mining technique. J Commun Appl Electron 4(12):4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lakshmanaprabhu SK, Shankar K, Khanna A, Gupta D, Rodrigues JJPC, Pinheiro PA, Albuquerque VHCD (2018) Effective feature to classify big data using social internet of things. IEEE Access 6:24196–24204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    NarasingaRao DGA (2016) Modeling on thyroid diagnosis using machine learning approaches—a review. Int J Pharma Bio Sci 7(2):679–686

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Geetha K, Santhosh Baboo Capt S (2016) Efficient thyroid disease classification using differential evolution with SVM. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 88(3):410–422

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Khattak RM, Ittermann T, Nauck M, Below H, Völzke H (2016) Monitoring the prevalence of thyroid disorders in the adult population of Northeast Germany. Popul Health Metr 14:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cannizzaro MA, Buffone A, Lo Bianco S, Okatyeva V, Cavallaro D, Caruso V, Caglià P (2015) The thyroid disease in the elderly: our experience. J Surg 33:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Deokar PG, Nageotte AN, Lange MJ, Basutkar DG (2016) Prevalence of thyroid disorders in a tertiary care center. J Curr Res 8(9):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    James R, Kumar V (2012) Study on the prevalence of thyroid diseases in Ernakulam City and Cherthala Town of Kerala State, India. Int J Sci Res Publ 2(2):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xu B, Ghossein RA (2018) The contribution of molecular pathology to the classification of thyroid tumors. Diagn Histopathol 24:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhu Y, Fu Z, Fei J (2017) An image augmentation method using the convolutional network for thyroid nodule classification by transfer learning. In: 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). IEEE, pp 1819–1823

  18. 18.

    Chandel K, Kunwar V, Sabitha S, Choudhury T, Mukherjee S (2016) A comparative study on thyroid disease detection using K-nearest neighbor and Naive Bayes classification techniques. CSI Trans ICT 4(2–4):313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mahurkar KK, Gaikwad DP (2017) Normalization using improvised K-means applied in diagnosing thyroid disease with ANN. In: 2017 International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICEI). IEEE, pp 579–583

  20. 20.

    Shankar K (2017) Prediction of most risk factors in hepatitis disease using apriori algorithm. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 8(5):477–484

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Peng Y, Wu Z, Jiang J (2010) A novel feature selection approach for biomedical data classification. J Biomed Inform 3(1):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jitkongchuen D, Padang P, Pongtawevirat P (2016) Grey wolf optimization algorithm with invasion-based migration operation. In: Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2016 IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on 2016 Jun 26. IEEE, pp 1–5

  23. 23.

    Zhang N, Ruan S, Lebonvallet S, Liao Q, Zhu Y (2009) Multi-kernel SVM based classification for brain tumor segmentation of MRI multi-sequence. In: 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, pp 3373–3376

  24. 24.

    Gupta D, Sundaram S, Khanna A, Hassanien AE, Albuquerque VHCD (2018) Improved diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease based on optimized crow search algorithm. Comput Electr Eng 68:412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shankar, K., Lakshmanaprabu, S.K., Gupta, D. et al. Optimal feature-based multi-kernel SVM approach for thyroid disease classification. J Supercomput 76, 1128–1143 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2469-4

Download citation


  • Thyroid diseases
  • Feature selection
  • Optimization
  • Gray wolf
  • Classification