Advertisement

High-performance computing for the optimization of high-pressure thermal treatments in food industry

  • M. R. Ferrández
  • S. Puertas-Martín
  • J. L. Redondo
  • B. Ivorra
  • A. M. Ramos
  • P. M. Ortigosa
Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

In food industry, the combined treatments based on high-pressure and temperature (HPT) are frequently used to increase the durability of the products without damaging their organoleptic and nutritional properties. However, achieving a reasonable compromise between conservation and quality is usually a challenging task. In a previous work, we proposed a decision tool which solves a multi-objective optimization problem providing a set of pressure and temperature configurations for the HPT equipment in order to adapt the final product to different quality scenarios. The considered optimizer is a population-based evolutionary algorithm that takes the decision maker preferences into account. Nevertheless, when the number of solutions demanded by the decision maker is very large or a high precision is required, the computational time needed by such an algorithm may not be negligible at all. In this work, a parallel version of the optimizer has been designed. This parallel algorithm allows obtaining a greater number of solutions by working with more individuals in the population due to the significant reduction in the total execution time (up to 95.6%). Additionally, using it, we can consider more iterations in the optimization process that lead us to better distributed and more accurate solutions. The computational experiments show that the performance of the proposed method is scalable and its speedup is almost linear.

Keywords

High-performance computing Multi-objective optimization Genetic algorithms High-pressure Food industry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by Grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (TIN2015-66680-C2-1-R and MTM2015-64865P); Junta de Andalucía (P11-TIC7176 and P12-TIC301), in part financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Juana López Redondo is a fellow of the Spanish “Ramón y Cajal” contract program, co-financed by the European Social Fund. Savíns Puertas-Martín is a fellow of the Spanish “Formación del Profesorado Universitario” program, financed by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport. The authors gratefully acknowledge Nicolás Calvo Cruz for his suggestions and kind assistance in the redaction of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Alavani C, Glowinski R, Gomez S, Ivorra B, Joshi P, Ramos AM (2010) Modelling and simulation of a polluted water pumping process. Math Comput Modell 51(5):461–472CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beume N, Naujoks B, Emmerich M (2007) SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur J Oper Res 181(3):1653–1669CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    COMSOL, Inc: COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual, version 5.3. www.comsol.com
  4. 4.
    Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deb K, Sundar J (2006) Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 635–642. ACMGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denys S, Ludikhuyze LR, Van Loey AM, Hendrickx ME (2000) Modeling conductive heat transfer and process uniformity during batch high-pressure processing of foods. Biotechnol Prog 16(1):92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fernández J, Tóth B (2009) Obtaining the efficient set of nonlinear biobjective optimization problems via interval branch-and-bound methods. Comput Optim Appl 42(3):393–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-007-9135-8 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrández MR, Redondo JL, Ivorra B, Ramos AM, Ortigosa PM (2017) A decision tool based on a multi-objective methodology for designing high-pressure thermal treatments in food industry. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2018/02/6446.html
  9. 9.
    Filatovas E, Kurasova O, Sindhya K (2015) Synchronous R-NSGA-II: an extended preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization. Informatica 26(1):33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filatovas E, Lančinskas A, Kurasova O, Žilinskas J (2017) A preference-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm R-NSGA-II with stochastic local search. Cent Eur J Oper Res 25(4):859–878MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gomez S, Ivorra B, Ramos AM (2011) Optimization of a pumping ship trajectory to clean oil contamination in the open sea. Math Comput Modell 54(1):477–489MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayashi R, Kawamura Y, Nakasa T, Okinaka O (1989) Application of high pressure to food processing: pressurization of egg white and yolk, and properties of gels formed. Agric Biol Chem 53(11):2935–2939Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Infante JA, Ivorra B, Ramos AM, Rey JM (2009) On the modelling and simulation of high pressure processes and inactivation of enzymes in food engineering. Math Models Methods Appl Sci (M3AS) 19(12):2203–2229MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li H, Zhang Q (2009) Multiobjective Optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(2):229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norton T, Sun D (2008) Recent advances in the use of high pressure as an effective processing technique in the food industry. Food Bioprocess Technol 1(1):2–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Otero L, Ousegui A, Guignon B, Le Bail A, Sanz PD (2006) Evaluation of the thermophysical properties of tylose gel under pressure in the phase change domain. Food Hydrocolloids 20(4):449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otero L, Ramos AM, De Elvira C, Sanz PD (2007) A model to design high-pressure processes towards an uniform temperature distribution. J Food Eng 78(4):1463–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramos AM (2012) Introducción al análisis matemático del método de elementos finitos. Editorial Complutense. ISBN: 978-84-9938-128-2Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rastogi NK, Raghavarao KSMS, Balasubramaniam VM, Niranjan K, Knorr D (2007) Opportunities and challenges in high pressure processing of foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47(1):69–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Redondo JL, Fernández J, Álvarez JD, Arrondo AG, Ortigosa PM (2015) Approximating the Pareto-front of a planar bi-objective competitive facility location and design problem. Comput Oper Res 62:337–349MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Redondo JL, Fernández J, Ortigosa PM (2017) FEMOEA: a fast and efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Math Methods Oper Res 85(1):113–135MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruiz AB, Saborido R, Luque M (2015) A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the weighting achievement scalarizing function genetic algorithm. J Glob Optim 62(1):101–129.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-014-0214-y MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verbeyst L, Bogaerts R, Van der Plancken I, Hendrickx M, Van Loey AM (2013) Modelling of vitamin C degradation during thermal and high-pressure treatments of red fruit. Food Bioprocess Technol 6(4):1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    While L, Bradstreet L, Barone L (2012) A fast way of calculating exact hypervolumes. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16(1):86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(6):712–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. Tech. Rep. 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms—a comparative case study. In: Eiben AE (ed) Parallel problem solving from nature V. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. de InformáticaUniversidad de Almería, ceiA3, Ctra. SacramentoAlmeríaSpain
  2. 2.Instituto de Matemática Interdisciplinar (IMI) & Dept. de Matemática AplicadaUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations