Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CCA: a deadline-constrained workflow scheduling algorithm for multicore resources on the cloud

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Workflows are adopted as a powerful modeling technique to represent diverse applications in different scientific fields as a number of loosely coupled tasks. Given the unique features of cloud technology, the issue of cloud workflow scheduling is a critical research topic. Users can utilize services on the cloud in a pay-as-you-go manner and meet their quality of service (QoS) requirements. In the context of the commercial cloud, execution time and especially execution expenses are considered as two of the most important QoS requirements. On the other hand, the remarkable growth of multicore processor technology has led to the use of these processors by Infrastructure as a Service cloud service providers. Therefore, considering the multicore processing resources on the cloud, in addition to time and cost constraints, makes cloud workflow scheduling even more challenging. In this research, a heuristic workflow scheduling algorithm is proposed that attempts to minimize the execution cost considering a user-defined deadline constraint. The proposed algorithm divides the workflow into a number of clusters and then an extendable and flexible scoring approach chooses the best cluster combinations to achieve the algorithm’s goals. Experimental results demonstrate a great reduction in resource leasing costs while the workflow deadline is met.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrishami S, Naghibzadeh M, Epema DHJ (2012) Cost-driven scheduling of grid workflows using partial critical paths. Parallel Distrib Syst IEEE Trans 23(8):1400–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bittencourt LF, Madeira ERM (2011) HCOC: a cost optimization algorithm for workflow scheduling in hybrid clouds. J Internet Serv Appl 2(3):207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Naghibzadeh M (2016) Modeling and scheduling hybrid workflows of tasks and task interaction graphs on the cloud. Future Gen Comput Syst 65. doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.05.029

  4. Deelman E, Singh G, Su M-H, Blythe J, Gil Y, Kesselman C, Mehta G, Vahi K, Berriman GB, Good J (2005) Pegasus: a framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Sci Progr 13(3):219–237

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berman F, Casanova H, Chien A, Cooper K, Dail H, Dasgupta A, Deng W, Dongarra J, Johnsson L, Kennedy K (2005) New grid scheduling and rescheduling methods in the GrADS project. Int J Parallel Progr 33(2–3):209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wieczorek M, Prodan R, Fahringer T (2005) Scheduling of scientific workflows in the ASKALON grid environment. ACM SIGMOD Rec 34(3):56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrishami S, Naghibzadeh M, Epema DHJ (2013) Deadline-constrained workflow scheduling algorithms for infrastructure as a service clouds. Future Gen Comput Syst 29(1):158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abraham A, Buyya R, Nath B (2000) Nature’s heuristics for scheduling jobs on computational grids. In: The 8th IEEE international conference on advanced computing and communications (ADCOM 2000), pp 45–52

  9. Aggarwal AK, Kent RD (2005) An adaptive generalized scheduler for grid applications. In: 19th International symposium on, high performance computing systems and applications, HPCS 2005, pp 188–194

  10. Chang V (2014) An introductory approach to risk visualization as a service. Open J Cloud Comput 1:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang V (2014) The business intelligence as a service in the cloud. Future Gen Comput Syst 37:512–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arabnejad H, Barbosa JG (2014) A budget constrained scheduling algorithm for workflow applications. J Grid Comput 12(4):665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dougan A, Özgüner F (2005) Biobjective scheduling algorithms for execution time-reliability trade-off in heterogeneous computing systems. Comput J 48(3):300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh G, Kesselman C, Deelman E (2007) A provisioning model and its comparison with best-effort for performance-cost optimization in grids. In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on high performance distributed computing, pp 117–126

  15. Su S, Li J, Huang Q, Huang X, Shuang K, Wang J (2013) Cost-efficient task scheduling for executing large programs in the cloud. Parallel Comput 39(4):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Szabo C, Kroeger T (2012) Evolving multi-objective strategies for task allocation of scientific workflows on public clouds. In: Evolutionary computation (CEC), IEEE congress on, pp 1–8

  17. Maheswaran M, Ali S, Siegal HJ, Hensgen D, Freund RF (1999) Dynamic matching and scheduling of a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous computing systems. In: 8th Proceedings on, heterogeneous computing workshop (HCW’99), pp 30–44

  18. Maheswaran M, Ali S, Siegel HJ, Hensgen D, Freund RF (1999) Dynamic mapping of a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous computing systems. J Parallel Distrib Comput 59(2):107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu F, Wu Q, Tan Y (2015) Workflow scheduling in cloud: a survey. J Supercomput 71(9):3373–3418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Topcuoglu H, Hariri S, Wu M (2002) Performance-effective and low-complexity task scheduling for heterogeneous computing. Parallel Distrib Syst IEEE Trans 13(3):260–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarkar V (1989) Partitioning and scheduling parallel programs for multiprocessors. Pitman, MA, USA Cambridge

  22. Bittencourt LF, Madeira ERM (2008) A performance-oriented adaptive scheduler for dependent tasks on grids. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 20(9):1029–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yao G, Ding Y, Jin Y, Hao K (2016) Endocrine-based coevolutionary multi-swarm for multi-objective workflow scheduling in a cloud system. Soft Comput. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2063-8

  24. Grandinetti L, Pisacane O, Sheikhalishahi M (2013) An approximate \(\epsilon \)-constraint method for a multi-objective job scheduling in the cloud. Future Gen Comput Syst 29(8):1901–1908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang W-L, Ren T-T, Feng M (2015) Quantum algorithms and mathematical formulations of biomolecular solutions of the vertex cover problem in the finite-dimensional hilbert space. NanoBiosci IEEE Trans 14(1):121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aggarwal M, Kent RD, Ngom A (2005) Genetic algorithm based scheduler for computational grids. In: 19th International symposium on, high performance computing systems and applications, HPCS 2005, pp 209–215

  27. Alhusaini AH, Prasanna VK, Raghavendra CS (1999) A unified resource scheduling framework for heterogeneous computing environments. In: 8th Proceedings on, heterogeneous computing workshop (HCW’99), pp 156–165

  28. Bajaj R, Agrawal DP (2004) Improving scheduling of tasks in a heterogeneous environment. Parallel Distrib Syst IEEE Trans 15(2):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu J, Ramamohanarao K, Buyya R (2009) Deadline/budget-based scheduling of workflows on utility grids. In: Buyya R, Bubendorfer K (eds) Market-oriented grid and utility computing. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 427–450

  30. Zheng W, Sakellariou R (2013) Budget-deadline constrained workflow planning for admission control. J Grid Comput 11(4):633–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang T, Gerasoulis A (1994) DSC: scheduling parallel tasks on an unbounded number of processors. Parallel Distrib Syst IEEE Trans 5(9):951–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bittencourt LF, Madeira ERM (2010) Towards the scheduling of multiple workflows on computational grids. J Grid Comput 8(3):419–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Garg SK, Yeo CS, Anandasivam A, Buyya R (2011) Environment-conscious scheduling of HPC applications on distributed cloud-oriented data centers. J Parallel Distrib Comput 71(6):732–749

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Beloglazov A, Abawajy J, Buyya R (2012) Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Gen Comput Syst 28(5):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Younge AJ, Von Laszewski G, Wang L, Lopez-Alarcon S, Carithers W (2010) Efficient resource management for cloud computing environments. In: Green computing conference international, pp 357–364

  36. Nathani A, Chaudhary S, Somani G (2012) Policy based resource allocation in IaaS cloud. Future Gen Comput Syst 28(1):94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang W, Zeng G, Tang D, Yao J (2012) Cloud-DLS: dynamic trusted scheduling for cloud computing. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):2321–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frîncu ME (2014) Scheduling highly available applications on cloud environments. Future Gen Comput Syst 32:138–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Malawski M, Juve G, Deelman E, Nabrzyski J (2012) Cost-and deadline-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles in iaas clouds. In: Proceedings of the international conference on high performance computing, storage and analysis, networking, p 22

  40. Abrishami S, Naghibzadeh M (2011) Budget constrained scheduling of grid workflows using partial critical paths. In: World congress in computer science, computer engineering, and applied computing (WORLDCOMP’11)

  41. Poola D, Garg SK, Buyya R, Yang Y, Ramamohanarao K (2014) Robust scheduling of scientific workflows with deadline and budget constraints in clouds. In: The 28th IEEE international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA-2014), pp 1–8

  42. Deelman E, Gannon D, Shields M, Taylor I (2009) Workflows and e-Science: an overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Gen Comput Syst 25(5):528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu J, Buyya R (2005) A taxonomy of workflow management systems for grid computing. J Grid Comput 3(3–4):171–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bharathi S, Chervenak A, Deelman E, Mehta G, Su M-H, Vahi K (2008) Characterization of scientific workflows. In: Workflows in support of large-scale science, WORKS 2008, 3 Workshop on, pp 1–10

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Arash Deldari, Mahmoud Naghibzadeh & Saeid Abrishami

Authors
  1. Arash Deldari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahmoud Naghibzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saeid Abrishami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Naghibzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deldari, A., Naghibzadeh, M. & Abrishami, S. CCA: a deadline-constrained workflow scheduling algorithm for multicore resources on the cloud. J Supercomput 73, 756–781 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1789-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1789-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation