Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
The Quantified Argument Calculus with Two- and Three-valued Truth-valuational Semantics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Open Access
  • Published: 25 November 2022

The Quantified Argument Calculus with Two- and Three-valued Truth-valuational Semantics

  • Hongkai Yin1 &
  • Hanoch Ben-Yami  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4903-854X1 

Studia Logica (2022)Cite this article

  • 79 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

We introduce a two-valued and a three-valued truth-valuational substitutional semantics for the Quantified Argument Calculus (Quarc). We then prove that the 2-valid arguments are identical to the 3-valid ones with strict-to-tolerant validity. Next, we introduce a Lemmon-style Natural Deduction system and prove the completeness of Quarc on both two- and three-valued versions, adapting Lindenbaum’s Lemma to truth-valuational semantics. We proceed to investigate the relations of three-valued Quarc and the Predicate Calculus (PC). Adding a logical predicate T to Quarc, true of all singular arguments, allows us to represent PC quantification in Quarc and translate PC into Quarc, preserving validity. Introducing a weak existential quantifier into PC allows us to translate Quarc into PC, also preserving validity. However, unlike the translated systems, neither extended system can have a sound and complete proof system with Cut, supporting the claim that these are basically different calculi.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  1. Ben-Yami, Hanoch, Logic & Natural Language: On Plural Reference and Its Semantic and Logical Significance. London: Routledge (2004). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250267.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Yami, Hanoch, The quantified argument calculus, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 7(1):120–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020313000373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Yami, Hanoch, The quantified argument calculus and natural logic, Dialectica 74(2):35–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i2.02.

  4. Ben-Yami, Hanoch, The Barcan formulas and necessary existence: the view from Quarc, Synthese 198(11):11029–10164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02771-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Yami, Hanoch. manuscript, Truth and Proof without Models: A Development and Justification of the Truth-Valuational Approach.

  6. Ben-Yami, Hanoch, and Edi Pavlović, Forthcoming, Completeness of the Quantified Argument Calculus on the Truth-Valuational Approach, in Boran Berčić, Aleksandra Golubović, and Majda Trobok, (eds.), Human Rationality:Festschrift for Nenad Smokrovć, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, pp. 53–67.

  7. Chiswell, Ian, and Wilfrid Hodges. Mathematical Logic, Oxford Texts in Logic. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cobreros, Pablo, Paul Egré, David Ripley, and Robert van Rooij, Tolerant, classical, strict, Journal of Philosophical Logic 41(2):347–385 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9165-z.

  9. Cobreros, Pablo, Paul Egré, David Ripley, and Robert van Rooij, Reaching transparent truth, Mind 122(488):841–866 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt110.

  10. Cobreros, Pablo, Paul Egré, David Ripley, and Robert van Rooij, Vagueness, Truth and Permissive Consequence, in Theodora Achourioti, Henri Galinon, José Martínez Fernáindez, and Kentaro Fujimoto (eds.), ]Unifying the Philosophy of Truth. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, vo. 36, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp. 409–430.

  11. Dunn, J. Michael, and Nuel D. Belnap. 1968, The substitution interpretation of the quantifiers, Noûs 2(2):177–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214704.

  12. Halldén, Sören. The Logic of Nonsense. Uppsala (1949).

  13. Kripke, Saul A, Outline of a Theory of Truth. Reprinted in his 2011. Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers, I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–98 (1975).

  14. Kripke, Saul A, Is There a Problem About Substitutional Quantification? In Truth and Meaning, edited by Gareth Evans and John McDowell, 325–419. Oxford University Press (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lanzet, Ran, A three-valued quantified argument calculus: Domain-free model-theory, completeness, and embedding of FOL, The Review of Symbolic Logic 10(3):549–582 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020317000053.

  16. Lanzet, Ran, and Hanoch Ben-Yami. 2004, Logical Inquiries into a New Formal System with Plural Reference, in Vincent Hendricks, Fabian Neuhaus, Stig Pedersen, Uwe Scheffler, and Heinrich Wansing (eds.), First-Order Logic Revisited, 173–223. Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leblanc, Hugues, A simplified account of validity and implication for quantificational logic, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 33(2):231–235 (1968). https://doi.org/10.2307/2269868.

  18. Leblanc, Hugues, Truth-Value Semantics. Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Company (1976).

  19. Leblanc, Hugues, Alternatives to Standard First-Order Semantics, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner(eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic: Volume I: Elements of Classical Logic, Synthese Library, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp. 189–274 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7066-3_3.

  20. Lewis, H. A., Substitutional Quantification and Nonstandard Quantifiers, Noûs 19(3): 447–451 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/2214953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pascucci, Matteo, An Axiomatic Approach to the Quantified Argument Calculus. Erkenntnis, January (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00519-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pavlović, Edi, The Quantified Argument Calculus: An Inquiry into Its Logical Properties and Applications. PhD thesis, Central European University, Budapest (2017).

  23. Pavlović, Edi, and Norbert Gratzl, Free Logic and the Quantified Argument Calculus, in Gabriele M. Mras, Paul Weingartner, and Bernhard Ritter(eds.), Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics: Proceedings of the 41st International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter (pp. 105–116)(2019a). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110657883-007.

  24. Pavlović, Edi, and Norbert Gratzl, Proof-Theoretic Analysis of The Quantified Argument Calculus. The Review of Symbolic Logic 12(4):607–636 (2019b). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020318000114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavlović, Edi, and Norbert Gratzl, Abstract Forms of Quantification in the Quantified Argument Calculus. The Review of Symbolic Logic, March, 1-31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/S175502032100006X.

  26. Peano, Giuseppe, Formulaire de Mathématique. Turin: Bocca Frères, CH. Clausen (1897).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Priest, Graham, The logic of paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(1):219–241 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Priest, Graham, Towards Non-Being. Second Edition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press (2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Raab, Jonas, The Relationship of QUARC and Classical Logic. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (2016).

  30. Raab, Jonas, Aristotle, Logic, and QUARC, History and Philosophy of Logic 39(4):305–340 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2018.1467198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Strawson, P. F., On Referring, Mind 59(235):320–344 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Strawson, P. F., Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Strawson, P. F., Identifying reference and truth-values, Theoria 30(2):96–118 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1964.tb00404.x.

  34. Westerståhl, Dag. manuscript, Foundations of First-Order Logic: Completeness, Incompleteness, Computability.

Download references

Funding

Open access funding provided by Central European University Private University

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central European University, Vienna, Austria

    Hongkai Yin & Hanoch Ben-Yami

Authors
  1. Hongkai Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanoch Ben-Yami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanoch Ben-Yami.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presented by Heinrich Wansing.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, H., Ben-Yami, H. The Quantified Argument Calculus with Two- and Three-valued Truth-valuational Semantics. Stud Logica (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-022-10022-5

Download citation

  • Received: 25 May 2021

  • Published: 25 November 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-022-10022-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Quantified argument calculus
  • Truth-valuational semantics
  • Substitutional quantification
  • Lindenbaum’s lemma
  • Three-valued semantics
  • Strict-to-tolerant validity
  • Completeness
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.