Abstract
We begin with the idea that lines of reasoning are continuous mental processes and develop a notion of continuity in proof. This requires abstracting the notion of a proof as a set of sentences ordered by provability. We can then distinguish between discrete steps of a proof and possibly continuous stages, defining indexing functions to pick these out. Proof stages can be associated with the application of continuously variable rules, connecting continuity in lines of reasoning with continuously variable reasons. Some examples of continuous proofs are provided. We conclude by presenting some fundamental facts about continuous proofs, analogous to continuous structural rules and composition. We take this to be a development on its own, as well as lending support to non-finitistic constructionism.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bell, J. L., Continuity and infinitesimals, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010.
Brouwer, L. E. J., Points, and Spaces, Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics, 1975, pp. 522-538.
Brouwer, L. E. J., Intuitionism and formalism, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 20(2):81-96, 2013.
Kant, I., Critique of the Power of Judgment, Cambridge University Press, 2001, 1790.
Kari, L., DNA computing: arrival of biological mathematics, The mathematical intelligencer 19(2):9-22, 1997.
Leng, G., and M. Ludwig, Information processing in the hypothalamus: peptides and analogue computation, Journal of Neuroendocrinology 18(6):379-392, 1997.
McNulty, M. B., Continuity of change in Kant’s dynamics, Synthese 1–28, 2017.
Paun, G., G. Rozenberg, and A. Salomaa, DNA Computing: New Computing Paradigms. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
Restall, G., Normal proofs, cut free derivations and structural rules, Studia Logica 102(6):1143-1166, 2014.
Thompson, A., Notes on Design Through Artificial Evolution: Opportunities and Algorithms, Adaptive computing in design and manufacture V. Springer, London, 2002, pp. 17–26.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Graham Priest for reading an earlier draft of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Presented by Jacek Malinowski
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Brunet, T.D.P., Fisher, E. Reasoning Continuously: A Formal Construction of Continuous Proofs. Stud Logica 108, 1145–1160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-019-09892-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-019-09892-z