In recent years, the effort to formalize erotetic inferences—i.e., inferences to and from questions—has become a central concern for those working in erotetic logic. However, few have sought to formulate a proof theory for these inferences. To fill this lacuna, we construct a calculus for (classes of) sequents that are sound and complete for two species of erotetic inferences studied by Inferential Erotetic Logic (IEL): erotetic evocation and erotetic implication. While an effort has been made to axiomatize the former in a sequent system, there is currently no proof theory for the latter. Moreover, the extant axiomatization of erotetic evocation fails to capture its defeasible character and provides no rules for introducing or eliminating question-forming operators. In contrast, our calculus encodes defeasibility conditions on sequents and provides rules governing the introduction and elimination of erotetic formulas. We demonstrate that an elimination theorem holds for a version of the cut rule that applies to both declarative and erotetic formulas and that the rules for the axiomatic account of question evocation in IEL are admissible in our system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Belnap, N., The Logic of Questions and Answers, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1976.
Bimbo, K., Proof Theory: Sequent Calculi and Related Formalisms, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014.
Brandom, R., Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
Ciardelli, I., J. Groenendijk, and F. Roelofsen, On the semantics and logic of declaratives and interrogatives, Synthese 192(6): 1689–1728, 2015.
Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, 1984.
Hamblin, C. L., Questions, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36(3): 159–168, 1958.
Harrah, D., A logic of questions and answers, Philosophy of Science 28(1): 40–46, 1961.
Hintikka, J., The semantics of questions and the questions of semantics, Acta Philosophica Fennica 28: 4, 1976.
Hintikka, J., Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Karttunen, L., Syntax and semantics of questions, Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 3–44, 1977.
Ketonen, O., Untersuchungen zum Prädikatenkalkül, Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, 1944, Series A 1.
Kukla, R., and M. Lance, ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’ : the Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
Leszczyńska-Jasion, D., M. Urbański, and A. Wiśniewski, Socratic trees, Studia Logica 101(5): 959–986, 2013.
Meheus, J., Adaptive logics for question evocation, Logique Et Analyse 173(175): 135–164, 2001.
Millson, J., How to Ask a Question in the Space of Reasons, PhD Thesis, Emory University, 2014.
Millson, J., Queries and Assertions in Minimally Discursive Practice, Proceedings of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behavior AISB’50, 2014.
Peliš, M., Inferences with Ignorance: Logics of Questions:, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Piazza, M., and G. Pulcini, Uniqueness of axiomatic extensions of cut-free classical propositional logic, Logic Journal of IGPL 24(5): 708–718, 2016.
Piazza, M., and G. Pulcini, Unifying logics via context-sensitiveness, Journal of Logic and Computation 27(1): 21–40, 2017.
Poggiolesi, F., Gentzen Calculi for Modal Propositional Logic, Springer Netherlands, 2016.
Wiśniewski, A., The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995.
Wiśniewski, A., Socratic proofs, Journal of Philosophical Logic 33(3): 299–326, 2004.
Wiśniewski, A., Questions, Inferences, and Scenarios, Studies in Logic, College Publications, London, 2013.
Wiśniewski, A., An axiomatic account of question evocation: the propositional case, Axioms 5(4): 1–14, 2016.
Wiśniewski, A., G. Vanackere, and D. Leszczyńska, Socratic proofs and paraconsistency: a case study, Studia Logica 80(2-3): 431–466, 2005.
This work has benefited from the comments and suggestions of Andrzej Wiśniewski and two anonymous referees.
Presented by Andrzej Indrzejczak
About this article
Cite this article
Millson, J. A Cut-Free Sequent Calculus for Defeasible Erotetic Inferences. Stud Logica 107, 1279–1312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-018-9839-z
- Erotetic logic
- Proof theory
- Sequent calculus
- Defeasible reasoning