Basic Conditional Reasoning: How Children Mimic Counterfactual Reasoning

Abstract

Children approach counterfactual questions about stories with a reasoning strategy that falls short of adults’ Counterfactual Reasoning (CFR). It was dubbed “Basic Conditional Reasoning” (BCR) in Rafetseder et al. (Child Dev 81(1):376–389, 2010). In this paper we provide a characterisation of the differences between BCR and CFR using a distinction between permanent and nonpermanent features of stories and Lewis/Stalnaker counterfactual logic. The critical difference pertains to how consistency between a story and a conditional antecedent incompatible with a nonpermanent feature of the story is achieved. Basic conditional reasoners simply drop all nonpermanent features of the story. Counterfactual reasoners preserve as much of the story as possible while accommodating the antecedent.

References

  1. 1.

    Beck, S., D. P. Weisberg, P. Burns., and K. J. Riggs, Conditional reasoning and emotional experience: a review of the development of counterfactual thinking, Studia Logica, this issue.

  2. 2.

    Bennett, J. F., A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.

  3. 3.

    Bhatt, R., and R. Pancheva, Conditionals, in The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Blackwell, Boston, 2007, pp. 638–687.

  4. 4.

    Csibra G., G. Gergely: Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Science 13(4), 148–153 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Edgington, D., Counterfactuals and the benefit of hindsight, in P. Dowe and P. Noordhof (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals, Routledge, London, 2003.

  6. 6.

    Edgington D.: Counterfactuals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108(1), 1–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Edgington, D., Estimating conditional chances and evaluating counterfactuals, Studia Logica, this issue.

  8. 8.

    Gelman S. A., Goetz P. J., Sarnecka B. W., Flukes J.: Generic language in parent-child conversations. Language Learning and Development 4(1), 1–31 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Harris P. L., German T., Mills P.: Children’s use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning. Cognition 61(3), 233–259 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hollander M. A., Gelman S. A., Star J.: Children’s interpretation of generic noun phrases. Developmental Psychology 38(6), 883–894 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leslie S.J.: Generics and the structure of the mind. Philosophical Perspectives 21(1), 375–403 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Leslie S.J., Gelman S.A.: Quantified statements are recalled as generics. Cognitive Psychology 64(3), 186–214 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lewis, D., Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1973.

  14. 14.

    Lycan, W. G., Real Conditionals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.

  15. 15.

    Obermayr, S., Kontrafaktisches Denken unter Berücksichtigung hypothetischer Annahmen, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Salzburg, 2011.

  16. 16.

    Pelletier, J., and N. Asher, Generics and defaults, in J. van Bentham and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1997.

  17. 17.

    Rafetseder E., Cristi-Vargas R., Perner J.: Counterfactual reasoning:developing a sense of ‘nearest possible world’. Child Development 81(1), 376–389 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rafetseder E., Schwitalla M., Perner J.: Counterfactual reasoning: from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114, 389–404 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ward, T. B., and C. M. Sifonis, Task demands and generative thinking: what changes and what remains the same? Journal of Creative Behavior 31:245–259, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Leahy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leahy, B., Rafetseder, E. & Perner, J. Basic Conditional Reasoning: How Children Mimic Counterfactual Reasoning. Stud Logica 102, 793–810 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-013-9510-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Counterfactual Reasoning
  • Basic Conditional Reasoning
  • Counterfactuals
  • Possible worlds semantics
  • Generic reasoning