Advertisement

A theoretical investigation on the mechanism of cycloaddition reactions of fulvenes with tetrazine and diazacyclopentadienone derivatives

  • Mina Haghdadi
  • Mina Alashti
  • Hassan Ghasemnejad Bosra
Original Research

Abstract

The mechanism of cycloaddition reactions for 6-dimethylaminofulvene and 6,6-diphenylfulvene with tetrazine and diazacyclopentadienone are studied by DFT at the MPWB1K/cc-pVDZ level of theory. The energy results indicated that the [6 + 4] cycloaddition reaction of 6-dimethylaminofulvene with tetrazine and diazacyclopentadienone derivatives proceeds in a stepwise fashion, while the [2 + 4] cycloaddition reaction of 6,6-diphenylfulvene might proceed in a one-step fashion. Our calculations showed some unfavorable processes with unstable cycloadducts arising from [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions which are unobserved in the experimental results. Also, an analysis of the Parr functions for the reactants allows us to provide an explanation of the selectivity of these cycloaddition reactions.

Keywords

Cycloaddition reactions One-step Stepwise Fulvene Density functional theory Domino reaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Louise S. Price, University College London, UK, for reading the manuscript and providing valuable suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

We warranty that this manuscript is original, that this has been written by the stated authors, and that this has not been published elsewhere; the manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

We wish to confirm that it has not been published previously (partly or in full). This study is not split-up into several parts. We confirm that no data have been fabricated or manipulated. No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors property. This manuscript contains no libelous or other unlawful statements and does not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.

Supplementary material

11224_2018_1138_MOESM1_ESM.docx (448 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 448 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Neuenschwander M (1989) The chemistry of double-bonded functional groups. In S Patai (Ed.), Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rawson DI, Carpenter BK, Hoffmann HR (1979) Loss of allyl cation configuration in cycloadditions to electron-rich conjugated dienes. J Am Chem Soc 101:1786–1793.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00501a025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noyori R, Hayakawa Y, Takaya H, Murai S, Kobayashi R, Sonoda N (1978) Carbon-carbon bond formation promoted by transition metal carbonyls. 16. Reaction of α,α-dibromo ketones and iron carbonyls. Mechanistic aspects. J Am Chem Soc 100:1759–1765.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00474a018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Imafuku K, Arai K (1989) A simple and convenient synthesis of 5-alkyl-substituted 3-isopropenyl-and 3-acetyltropolones synthesis, 501–505Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    PaquetteLA CJA, Andrews DR (1985) An oxyanionic [3,3]-sigmatropic approach to the ophiobolin ring system. J Org Chem 50:201–205.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00202a012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harre M, Raddatz P, Walenta R, Winterfeldt E (1982) 4-Oxo-2-cyclopentenyl acetate—a synthetic intermediate. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 21:480–492.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.198204801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Himeda Y, Yamataka H, Ueda I, Hatanaka M (1997) [3 + 2] annulation of allylidenetriphenylphosphorane with 1,2-diacylethylenes and 1,2-diacylacetylenes: a concerted synthesis of tri- and tetrasubstituted cyclopentadienes and fulvenes. J Org Chem 62:6529–6653.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo970594x8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nair V, Nair AG Radhakrishnan VM, Nadakumar V, Rath NP (1997) Diels-Alder reactions of a 6-arenyl fulvene participating both as diene and dienophile. Synlett:767–768.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-1997-5763
  9. 9.
    Gupta YN, Doa MJ, Houk KN (1982) Intramolecular [6 + 4] cycloaddition: intramolecular control of periselectivity. J Am Chem Soc 104:7336–7338.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00389a083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suda M, Hafner K (1977) Chemical reactivity of pentalene derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett 18:2453–2456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)83791-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu TC, Houk KN (1985) Construction of linear-fused tricyclopentanoids by intramolecular [6 + 2] cycloadditions of fulvenes with enamines. J Am Chem Soc 107:5308–5309.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00304a065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gleiter R, Borzyk O (1995) Synthesis of rodlike distellenes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 34:1001–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199510011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hong BC, Sun SS, Tsai YC (1997) Metal-mediated [6 + 3] cycloaddition reactions of fulvenes. A novel approach to Indan systems. J Org Chem 62:7717–7725.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo970984j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nair V, Mathew B (2000) Hetero Diels–Alder reactions of o-thioquinones with pentafulvenes: efficient synthesis of novel benzoxathiins. Tetrahedron Lett 41:6919–6921.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01146-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Öcal N, Bağdatli E, Arslan M (2005) Diels-Alder reactions of new methoxysubstituted-6-arylfulvenes. Turk J Chem 29:7–16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hong BC, Gupta AK, Wu MF, Liao JH (2004) Formal [6 + 3] cycloaddition of fulvenes with 2H-azirine: a facile approach to the [2]pyrindines system. Tetrahedron Lett 45:1663–1666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2003.12.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sasaki T, Kanematsu K, Kataoka T (1973) Molecular design by cycloaddition reactions. XI. Cycloaddition of tropone and diphenylfulvene. Chem Lett 2:1183–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1973.1183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houk KN, Luskus LJ, Bhacca NS (1970) Novel double [6 + 4] cycloaddition of tropone to dimethylfulvene. J Am Chem Soc 92:6392–6394.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00724a077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanematsu K, lizuka K (1975) Observation of regioselectivity in cycloaddition reaction of oxabenzonorbornadiene with 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran. Heterocycles 3:109–112.  https://doi.org/10.3987/R-1975-02-0109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nair V, Kumar S, Anilkumar G, Nair JS (1995) Diels-alder reactions of o-benzoquinones with 6-substituted fulvenes: facile synthesis of 1-aryl and 1,1-diarylmethylene-4,7-ethanoindene-8,9-diones 1. Tetrahedron 51:9155–9156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4020(95)00512-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nair V, Kumar S, Anilkumar G, Radhakrishnan KV, Sheela KC, Rath P (1997) Diels-Alder reactions of a 6-arenyl fulvene with dienes and dienophiles and related chemistry. Tetrahedron 53:17361–17372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(97)10160-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Houk KN, Sims J, Watts CR, Luskus LJ (1973) Origin of reactivity, regioselectivity, and periselectivity in 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions. J Am Chem Soc 95:7301–7315.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00803a018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sustmann R (1971) A simple model for substituent effects in cycloaddition reactions. I. 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions. Tetrahedron Lett 12:2717–2721.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)96961-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paddon-Row MN, Watson PL, Warrener RN (1973) Application of PMO theory to the problem of perispecificity in cross-conjugated systems with special attention to the isobenzofulvene nucleus. Tetrahedron Lett:1033–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)95897-6
  25. 25.
    Epiotis ND (1973) Configuration interaction and organic reactivity. IV. Concepts and generalizations. J Am Chem Soc 95:1214–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00785a601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sasaki T, Kanematsu K, Kataokaalashti T (1975) Molecular design by cycloaddition reactions. XXI. Periselectivity of reactions of fulvenes with heterodienes and heterodienophiles. J Org Chem 40:1201–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00897a004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Domingo LR (2014) A new C–C bond formation model based on the quantum chemical topology of electron density. RSC Adv 4:32415–32428.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA04280H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Domingo LR, Sáeza JA (2009) Understanding the mechanism of polar Diels–Alder reactions. Org Biomol Chem 7:3576–3583.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B909611F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rhyman L, Ramasami P, Joule JA, Sáeza JA, Domingo LR (2013) Understanding the formation of [3 + 2] and [2 + 4] cycloadducts in the Lewis acid catalysed reaction between methyl glyoxylate oxime and cyclopentadiene: a theoretical study. RSC Adv 3:447–457.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA22332E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Houk KN, Gonzalez J, Li Y (1995) Pericyclic reaction transition states: passions and punctilios, 1935-1995. Acc Chem Res 28:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00050a004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Domingo LR, Aurell MJ, Pérez P (2014) A DFT analysis of the participation of zwitterionic TACs in polar [3+2] cycloaddition reactions. Tetrahedron 70:4519–4525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2014.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zakrzewski VG, Montgomery JAJ, Start-mann RE, Burant JC, Daprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochtersk JI, Petersson GA, Ayala Y, Ui QC, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rubuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Oritz JV, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Comperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Gonzalez C, Challa-combe M, Gill MW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzalez C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA (2009) Gaussian 09 revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hehre WJ, Radom L, PVR S, Pople JA (1986) Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tomasi J, Persico M (1994) Molecular interactions in solution: an overview of methods based on continuous distributions of the solvent. Chem Rev 94:2027–2094.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00031a013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cances E, Mennucci B, Tomasi J (1997) A new integral equation formalism for the polarizable continuum model. J Chem Phys 107:3032–3041.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reed AE, Weinstock RB, Weinhold F (1985) Natural population analysis. J Chem Phys 83:735–746.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem Rev 88:899–926.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00088a005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Parr RG, Szentpaly LV, Liu S (1999) Electrophilicity index. J Am Chem Soc 121:1922–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983494x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density functional theory of atoms, molecules. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Domingo LR, Pérez P (2008) Understanding the reactivity of captodative ethylenes in polar cycloaddition reactions. A Theoretical Study J Org Chem 73:4615–4624.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo800572a Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pérez P, Domingo LR, Duque-Noreña M, Chamorro E (2009) A condensed-to-atom nucleophilicity index an application to the director effects on the electrophilic aromatic substitutions. J Mol Struct 895:86–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2008.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Domingo LR, Pérez P, Saez JA (2013) Understanding the local reactivity in polar organic reactions through electrophilic and nucleophilic Parr functions. RSC Adv 3:1486–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA22886F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gonzalez C, Schlegel HB (1990) Reaction path following in mass-weighted internal coordinates. J Phys Chem 94:5523.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100377a021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Parr RG, Yang W (1995) Density-functional theory of the electronic structure of molecules. Annu Rev Phys Chem 46:701–728.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.46.100195.003413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chermette H (1999) Chemical reactivity indexes in density functional theory. J Comput Chem 20:129–154.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19990115)20:1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ess DH, Jones GO, Houk KN (2006) Conceptual, qualitative, and quantitative theories of 1,3-dipolar and Diels–Alder cycloadditions used in synthesis. Adv Synth Catal 348:2337–2361.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200600431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Domingo LR, Aurell MJ, Pérez P, Contreras R (2002) Quantitative characterization of the global electrophilicity power of common diene/dienophile pairs in Diels-Ald reactions. Tetrahedron 58:4417–4423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00410-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jaramillo P, Domingo LR, Chamorro E, Pérez PJ (2008) A further exploration of a nucleophilicity index based on the gas-phase ionization potentials. J Mol Struct 865:68–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2008.06.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Domingo LR, Pérez P (2011) The nucleophilicity N index in organic chemistry. Org Biomol Chem 9:7168–7175.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1OB05856H CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mina Haghdadi
    • 1
  • Mina Alashti
    • 1
  • Hassan Ghasemnejad Bosra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIslamic Azad UniversityBabolIran

Personalised recommendations