Advertisement

Structural Chemistry

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 859–865 | Cite as

Conformational flexibility and pseudosymmetric aggregation in a betainium salt hydrate

  • Kinga Roszak
  • Andrzej Katrusiak
  • Zofia Dega-Szafran
  • Anna Komasa
  • Iwona Kowalczyk
  • Mirosław Szafran
Open Access
Original Research

Abstract

The cation of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid exhibits a considerable conformational flexibility connected to the orientation of carboxyl group, coupled to the proton position, and rotations of the trimethylammonium group. This conformational flexibility considerably affects the aggregation of ions and molecules of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate, which crystallizes in a low-symmetry structure with four symmetry-independent formula units (monoclinic space group Pc, Z’ = 4, model I). However this structure approximates the symmetry of space group P21/c in the same unit cell (Z’ = 2, model II), and also even a still more highly symmetric structure of space group P21/c in a half-smaller unit cell (Z’ = 1, model III). The independent formula units are differentiated by the conformations of trimethylammonium groups (ordered in model I, but disordered in models II and III), conformations of the carboxyl groups and positions of OH···O bonded water molecules (ordered in molecules I and II, and disordered in model III), while the bulks of the cations and iodide anions are consistent for all models. While the calorimetric study and varied-temperature structural determinations exclude phase transitions of the highly pseudosymmetric model I. This pseudosymmetry is independent of temperature between 100 K and the m.p. at 463 K, and illustrates subtle structural effects leading complex molecular aggregation in the crystal. Theoretical computations confirm the low energy differences between the conformers.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Aggregation Betainium salt Hydrate Crystal structure Intermolecular interactions 

Introduction

Zwitterions are compounds with oppositely charged centers and often referred to as betaines dipolar ions, salt-bridged containing molecules and inner salts. These species are exeptionally important in biological transformations, organic sythesis and preparation of novel materials of various applications in medicine, pharmacy and industry [1, 2, 3]. Zwitterions contain a quaternary nitrogen atom and a carboxylate group, separated by one or more carbon atoms. The ammonium group is inert as a hydrogen bond center, whereas the carboxylate group is basic [4, 5]. At normal conditions betaines crystallize as hydrates, because of the strong H-acceptor carboxylic group and no acidic H-donors. The formation of hydrates is technologically important, however it generally cannot be always predicted [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. The zwitterionic hydrates crystallize with one, two, three or more water molecules [11]. Being good proton-acceptors, dipolar ions form 1:1, 2:1 and 3:2 adducts with inorganic acids, which crystallize as anhydrous compounds or hydrates. In the 2:1 complex two zwitterions are bridged by the H-atom, forming a homoconjugated cation with an inorganic anion as a counter ion. Most of the 2:1 complexes are anhydrous and only few of them crystallize as hydrates. The water molecule interacts with the anion [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. In the 1:1:H2O complexes of zwitterions with inorganic acids, the carboxylate group is protonated and it forms H-bonds COOH···OH2 to water molecules, which are further H-bonded to halogen anions [11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. However, in the complex of betaine hydrogen selenate monohydrate the anion interacts both with the carboxylate group of the protonated betaine and water [25]. Moreover, there are some exceptions from the typical interactions described above. In 3-hydroxypyridine betaine hydrochloride monohydrate the hydroxy substituent interacts with the water molecule, while the carboxylic group with the chloride anion, through the OH···OH2 and COOH···Cl hydrogen bonds of 2.566(2) and 2.993(2) Å, respectively [26]. In 4-amino-1-(2-carboxyethyl)-pyridinium bromide hemihydrate two symmetry independent carbonyl groups are H-bonded, one forming a centrosymmetric dimer and the second symmetry-independent group is H-bonded to the water molecule. Hence the complex is built of Br - H2O - cation - Br cation - cation - Br - cation - H2O - Br chain links [27]. The unusual water-betaine interactions are observed in 1-methylquinolinium-3-carboxylic chloride monohydrate, where the unit cell comprises six symmetry-independent complexes. In four of them the 1-methylquinolinium-3-carboxylic groups are H-bonded to water molecules, while in two others the carboxylate groups are H-bonded to hydronium ions [28]. The complexes of betaines with acids display interesting physical properties, including phase transitions, ferroelectric, antiferroelectic and ferroelastic behavior, as well as commensurate and incommensurate phases [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41].

An interesting group of zwitterionic compounds are benzbetaines, ortho-, meta- and para-trimethylammonium benzoates, and their esters, hydrates and salts with halogen anions [17, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51]. Quaternization of dimethylaminobenzoic acids by an excess methyl iodide in methanol depends on temperature and time of reaction [42]. In some condition the methyl group can transfer from the amino group to the carboxylic group to give an ester derivative [42, 51].

Recently, we reported two exceptionally similar polymorphs of a unique anhydrous [di-(3-trimethylammonium-benzoic acid)-(3-trimethylammonium-benzoate)]diiodide 3:2 complex [52]. Presently, we have obtained a highly pseudosymmetric hydrate of 3-trimethylammonium-benzoic acid iodide (1) 1:1 complex, shown in Fig. 1, and we studied its structure by single-crystal X-ray diffraction in the temperature range of 130-296 K, by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TG), differential thermal analysis (DTA), FTIR spectroscopy and DFT calculations.
Fig. 1.

The symmetry independent unit of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate. Thermal ellipsoids have been drawn at the 50% probability level. Independent cations A (atoms C1-C10), B (C11-C20), C (C21-C30) and D (C31-C40) are highlighted red, green, blue, and gray, respectively (all atomic labels, of four independent molecules and including H-atoms, are shown in Fig. S1, in Supplementary Material).

Experimental section

Synthesis

To a solution of 6 g (0.0365 mol) of 3-dimethylamino-benzoic acid in 30 ml CH3OH, 5.7 g (0.040 mol) of methyl iodide was added and stirred at 25 °C for 28 h. The crude product was filtered off, washed with acetonitrile. Yellow crystals were recrystallized from water, m.p. 189-194 °C. Analysis for C10H14NO2·H2O, m.wt. 327.15. Calc.: %C 36.94, %H 4.96, %N 4.31; Found: %C 37.09, %H 4.86, %N 4.28.

Measurements

The crystals of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate, 1, were obtained in the form of long plates, however their single-crystal quality was low. X-Ray diffraction data were measured using an Oxford Diffraction Excalibur EOS-CCD diffractometer, equipped with an EOS-CCD detector, with MoKα radiation, and a Cryosystem low-temperature attachment. Single-crystal diffraction data were collected at the 130-296 K temperature range. The structure was solved by direct methods with program SHELXS and refined on F 2 by full-matrix least-squares with SHELXL [53]. The positions of H-atoms in the cations were located from the molecular geometry and those in the water molecules were found from the difference Fourier maps and then the O-H distances were constrained in the refinement. The anisotropic thermal parameters were refined for the non-H-atoms, some of them with constrains reducing their elongation, and isotropic U iso parameters for H atoms were linked to U eq of their carriers. The atomic labels of non-H atoms in independent cations B/C/D are differentiated by adding 10/20/30 to the atom numbers of cation A, respectively; the O-atoms of water molecules are independently numbered as O1w, O2w, O3w and O4w, where letter ‘w’ indicates the water molecule; the labels of H-atoms are made of letter ‘H’ and the number of the label of their carriers, and additionally numbered by letters ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘c’ if required, while H-atoms in water molecules are numbered by additional digits 1 and 2: all labels are shown explicitly in Fig. S1 in Supplementary Material. The crystal data, together with the details concerning data collection and structure refinement are given in Tables 1 and S1 (in the Supplementary Material). The crystal data have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database Centre as Supplementary publications CCDC 1443312-1443323. Molecular illustrations were prepared using program Mercury CSD 3.3 [54].
Table 1.

Selected crystal data of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate at 296 K (cf. Table S1 in the Supplementary Material)

Formula

[C10H14NO2]+·I·H2O

Crystal system

monoclinic

Space group

Pc

a (Å)

19.559(2)

b (Å)

7.7357(4)

c (Å)

19.689(2)

β (o)

118.50(2)

Volume (Å3)

2618.0(3)

Z/Z

8/4

D x (gcm−3)

1.650

FTIR spectrum of 1 was measured in the KBr disk using a Bruker IFS 66v/S instrument, with the resolution of 2 cm-1. The spectra were accumulated of 64 scans.

The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of 1 was performed with a DSC THASS XP-10 calorimeter. The sample of 5.9 mg was stored in an Al2O3 crucible in nitrogen atmosphere and the rate of temperature change was 5 K min-1.

Simultaneous TG-DTA curves were obtained with thermal analysis system model Setaram Setsys 1200. The sample of 29.6 mg was stored in an Al2O3 crucible in nitrogen atmosphere and the rate of temperature change was 5 K min-1

Elemental analysis was made using an Elemental Model Vario EL III instrument.

DFT calculations

The DFT calculations were performed with the GAUSSIAN 09 program package [55]. The calculations employed the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional, which combines the hybrid exchange functional of Becke [56, 57] with the gradient-correlation functional of Lee et al. [58] and the split-valence polarized 6-311++G(d,p) basis set [59]. The basis set for iodine has been taken from the EMSI Basis Set Library [60, 61] created by Glukhovtsev et al. [62]. The geometries of molecules determined by X-ray diffraction were used as the starting models for the structure optimizations. All calculated IR frequencies are real, consistently with the minimum energies of the optimized structures.

Discussion

Crystal structure

The crystal structure of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate is composed of the 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic cation, iodide anion, and water molecules at the 1:1:1 ratio. This complex is remarkable in that it contains four independent formula units (Z’ = 4), as illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2.
Fig. 2.

Autostereographic projection [63] of the crystal structure of 1, with the torsion angle C8-N1-C3-C2 indicated for 4 symmetry independent cations: letters A, B, C and D on the left side of the drawing indicate the rows of the independent cations along [z]. Pseudosymmetry elements have been indicated in yellow (screw axes 21) and inversion centers (purple circles).

The crystal symmetry is of monoclinic space group Pc (model I), but it approximates a higher symmetry of space group P21/c (model II), and even still higher symmetry P21/c in the unit cell twice smaller along [x] (model III). This highly pseudosymmetric model III could be refined with anisotropic temperature factors to R 1 = 0.0718, but the water molecule appeared disordered in two positions and the thermal ellipsoids of the methyl were elongated (Z’ was equal to 1 for this pseudosymmetric model III); also the hydroxyl and carbonyl oxygen atoms of the carboxyl groups, as well as the carboxyl H atoms appeared disordered. The structure with the unit cell twice increased along [x] (as indicated by clearly observable, but considerably weaker reflections with odd h indices) still approximated the symmetry of space groups P21/c, with two symmetry-independent formula units (Z’ = 2). In this pseudosymmetric model II, the water molecules and the carboxyl groups became ordered, but one of independent cations had the methyls disordered. The R 1 factor for model II was 0.0637. Because the systematic absences of the 21 screw axes diverted slightly from zero intensities, we further reduced the model symmetry to space group Pc, which increased Z’ to 4, and fully eliminated the conformational disorder (model I). This model refined to the lowest residue factors (R 1 = 0.0594) and the lowest thermal displacement parameters. It also revealed subtle differences in the conformation of the carboxyl groups, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3, as well as the different orientations of trimethylammonium groups (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3.

Torsion angles O1-C7-C1-C2 in symmetry independent molecules A (red), B (green), C (blue) and D (black) in the structure of 1, as a function of temperature.

Fig. 4.

Torsion angles C8-N1-C3-C2 describing the orientation of trimethylammonium groups in symmetry independent molecules A (red), B (green), C (blue) and D (black) in the structure of 1, as a function of temperature. The magnitudes for molecules B and C have been transformed to the positive values.

According to the thermogravimetry (TG) measurements the compound 1 decomposes by losing water at 353 K, and at still higher temperature a series of transitions take place in the anhydrate. No phase transition in hydrate I has been detected between 160-353 K (see the TG and DSC signals in Figs. S3 and S4).

The low temperature structural studies showed no transitions either, and confirmed that the crystal remained in the Pc-symmetric phase with Z’ = 4 down to 130 K. Figure 5 shows the monotonic thermal expansion of the unit-cell parameters.
Fig. 5.

Unit-cell dimensions of 1 plotted as a function of temperature: (a) parameters a, b and c; (b) angle β and (c) the unit-cell volume. The estimated standard deviations are smaller than the symbols.

Four independent cations can be described as conformers due to different positions of trimethylammonium groups, as illustrated in Fig. 4. It can be observed that the positions of trimethylammonium groups in molecules A, B and D are similar within about 10° [i.e (10 ± 10)°], whereas the position of the group in molecule C is different by about 30°. The orientations of the trimethylammonium groups change within 10° between 300 and 130 K.

The carboxylic groups are bonded to the water molecule through the O(1)-H(1)∙∙∙O(1W), O(11)-H(11)∙∙∙O(2W), O(21)-H(21)∙∙∙O(3W) and O(31)-H(31)∙∙∙O(4W) hydrogen bonds Table 2, cf. Tables S2). The iodide anions are located close to the positively charged trimethylammonium groups, and distances are I(1)···N(1) 4.393(9), I(2)···N(2) 4.532(10), I(3)···N(3) 4.639(9) and I(4)···N(4) 4.421(8) Å.
Table 2.

Experimental (1-model I) and calculated 2A and 2B by the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) approach, selected dimensions of hydrogen bonds and short contacts for 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate (Å and °) at 296 K (cf. Table S2 in Supplementary Material)

 

D-H∙∙∙A

H∙∙∙A

D∙∙∙A

DH∙∙∙A

1-I

O(1) – H(1)∙∙∙O(1W)

1.679(8)

2.487(12)

167.8(8)

O(11) – H(11)∙∙∙O(2W)

1.798(15)

2.615(18)

174.4(11)

O(21) – H(21)∙∙∙O(3W)

1.967(8)

2.729(11)

154.2(3)

O(31) – H(31)∙∙∙O(4W)

1.816(8)

2.630(12)

171.8(8)

O(1W) – H(11W)∙∙∙I(2)

2.9999(10)

3.622(10)

131.1(6)

O(1W) – H(21W)i∙∙∙I(4)

2.9803(9)

3.736(7)

148.2(8)

O(2W) – H(12W)ii∙∙∙I(3)

2.8689(11)

3.586(11)

142.3(12)

O(2 W) – H(22W)∙∙∙I(1)

3.0024(9)

3.521(14)

120.9(10)

O(3W) – H(13W)iii∙∙∙I(2)

3.0110(8)

3.785(7)

151.1(8)

O(3W) – H(23W)iv∙∙∙I(4)

2.784(1)

3.568(11)

152.7(6)

O(4W) – H(24W)∙∙∙I(1)

2.9166(11)

3.526(7)

129.6(6)

O(4W) – H(14W)v∙∙∙I(3)

2.7583(8)

3.587(7)

163.2(4)

O(22)∙∙∙O(1W)vi

 

2.964(13)

 

O(2)∙∙∙O(3W)vii

 

3.027(12)

 

2A

O(1)-H(1)∙∙∙O(1W)

1.702

2.662

160.58

2B

O(1)-H(1)∙∙∙O(1W)

1.700

2.660

160.33

Symmetry codes: (i)=1 + x,y,1 + z; (ii)=x,2-y,-0.5 + z; (iii)=-1 + x,2-y,-0.5 + z; (iv)=x,3-y,0.5 + z; (v)=x,1-y,-0.5 + z; (vi)=1 + x,2-y,0.5 + z; (vii)=-1 + x,3-y,-0.5 + z

DFT calculations

The starting molecular geometries for theoretical computations were adopted of cations A and B with their closest I- anions and water molecules. We have chosen the cations A and B for the calculations, because their conformation significantly differ in the position of the carboxyl group, whereas only minor differences in the positions of the trimethylammonium group is present in cations C and D. These two structures have been optimized as models 2A and 2B at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. As can be seen in the drawings of two optimized models 2A and 2B, shown in Fig. 6, their conformations well reproduce the opposite orientation of the carboxyl groups, this in cations A and C versus that in cations B and D. It is thus apparent that both conformations of the carboxyl group are very similar energetically and therefore they both can be present in the crystal structure. On the other hand it shows that the conformational differentiation is advantageous for the crystal packing.
Fig. 6.

Computed structures of 2A and 2B of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate

The optimized structures well represent the crystal ones. The O(1)-H(1)∙∙∙O(1W) hydrogen bond is slightly shorter in 2B than in 2A, similarly as in the crystal (Table 2). The calculated energies are E(a.u) = -7590.8511393 and dipole moment μ = 16.18 D for 2A, and E(a.u) = -7590.8508038 and dipole moment μ = 15.87 D for 2B. The energy of structure 2A is lower by 0.88 KJ/mol than that of structure 2B. The optimized structures differ significantly in the orientation of the carboxylic group and slightly in the N+∙∙∙I distances, which are 4.082 in 2A and 4.092 Å in 2B. The torsion angles O1-C7-C1-C2 and C8-N1-C3-C2 describing the orientations of the carboxyl and trimethylammonium groups are 179.90 and 0.24° in model 2A and 0.09 and 0.11° in model 2B, respectively (cf. Figs 3 and 4).

FTIR spectrum

The solid-state spectrum of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate shown in Fig. 7 is consistent with the structure of 1. The band at 3447 cm-1 with a shoulder at 3555 cm-1 is attributed to the stretching vibration O(1W)-H(W) of water molecule. The broad absorption in the 3000-2000 cm-1 region is attributed to the νO(1)-H(1)∙∙∙O(1W) hydrogen bond vibration. It is typical for O-H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond of the length of ca. 2.6 Å. The splitting band at 1722 and 1704 cm-1 can be assigned to νCO modes in independent cations, while the intensive band at 1258 cm-1 to the δCO and δOH vibrations.
Fig. 7.

(a) The solid-state FTIR spectrum of 3-(trimethylammonium)-benzoic acid iodide hydrate (1) and (b) the calculated, by the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) approach, spectra of 2A (black line) and 2B (red line).

The calculated IR spectra of 2A and 2B, in vertical lines, are shown in Fig. 7b (the spectrum of 2A in black line and 2B in red line). The differences between the calculated and experimental frequencies follow from the fact that the experimental spectrum was recorded for the compound in solid state, while the computations were made for the vibrations of isolated molecule in gas phase. The calculated bands are shifted to higher wavenumbers relative to the experimental data, because the calculations are based on harmonic frequency, while the experimental ones are based on the anharmonic frequencies. In the computed theoretically IR spectra of 2A and 2B optimized structures the ν asO(1W)-H(W) and ν sO(1W)-H(W) bands are predicted at 3872 and 3696 cm-1, respectively. The νO(1)-H(1) mode is predicted at 3223 cm-1 in both spectra. The differences in the spectra of 2A and 2B are observed in the carboxylic group region. The νCO, δCO and δOH vibrations are calculated at 1764 and 1315 cm-1, respectively for 2A, whereas at 1770 and 1306 cm-1, respectively for 2B. The bands at 980 and 978 cm-1 are predicted to the γO(1)-H(1) vibrations in the spectra of 2A and 2B. The band at 611 cm−1 is calculated for γO(1W)-H(W) mode.

Conclusions

The high pseudosymmetry of crystal 1 can be attributed to the conformational freedom in the cations, where two opposite orientations of the carboxyl groups hardly change the potential energy of the cation. It discriminates the cations and also affects the positions of H-bonded water molecules. However the origin of further differentiation of the cations, by the orientations of trimethylammonium groups remains puzzling, particularly that this soft conformational parameter breaks the symmetry of inversion center. In the terms of crystal engineering, such a change could be most required for producing non-centrosymmetric crystals for second harmonic generation and other applications. It occurred that the crystals of 1 are quite stable and no transitions to any of higher-symmetric models II and III (both centrosymmetric) could be detected. It testifies that the factors differentiating the conformers are significant and their identification would significantly contribute to understanding of the rules governing the symmetry of molecules crystals.

Supplementary material

11224_2016_889_MOESM1_ESM.doc (2.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 2158 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Domingo X (1996) In: Lomax EG (ed) Amphoteric surfactants. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 76–190Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt A (2003) Adv Heterocycl Chem 85:67–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alcalde E (1994) Adv Heterocycl Chem 60:197–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones RA (2001) Quaternary ammonium salts. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laughlin RG (1991) Langmuir 7:842–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z, Dymarska S, Grundwald-Wyspiańska M (2002) J Mol Struct 609:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Kowalczyk I, Dega-Szafran Z, Drozd M (2004) J Mol Struct 689:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szafran M, Dega-Szafran Z, Grundwald-Wyspiańska M, Barczyński P, Pankowski M (2002) Pol J Chem 76:1191–1197Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Koput J, Dega-Szafran Z (2004) J Mol Struct 704:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z, Kowalczyk I (2013) J Mol Struct 1031:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szafran M, Ostrowska K, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z (2014) Spectrochim Acta A 128:844–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen XM, Mak TCW (1990) J Mol Struct 221:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen XM, Mak TCW (1990) J Mol Struct 240:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z (2006) J Mol Struct 794:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Koput J, Dega-Szafran Z (2006) J Mol Struct 784:98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z (2007) J Mol Struct 827:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Komasa A, Katrusiak A, Kaźmierczak M, Dega-Szafran Z, Szafran M (2015) Spectrochim Acta A 136:1149–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiyang W, Gnanam FD, Haussühl S (1986) Z Kristallogr 175:155–158Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang W-Y, Du X-M, Yang B-H, Mak TCW (1990) J Mol Struct 222:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beja AM, Taixão JA, Silva MR, da Veige LA (2000) Z Kristallogr 215:581–582Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ilczyszyn M, Godzisz D, Ilczyszyn MM (2002) J Mol Struct 611:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Szafran M, Kowalczyk I, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z (2003) J Mol Struct 651-653:621–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dega-Szafran Z, Katrusiak A, Szafran M, Barczyński P (2010) J Mol Struct 975:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dega-Szafran Z, Katrusiak A, Szafran M (2010) J Mol Struct 971:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baran J, Drozd M, Lis T, Śledź M, Barnes AJ, Ratajczak H (1995) J Mol Struct 372:29–40Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barczyński P, Komasa A, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z, Szafran M (2007) J Mol Struct 832:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kowalczyk I, Katrusiak A, Szafran M, Dega-Szafran Z (2012) J Mol Struct 1026:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barczyński P, Katrusiak A, Koput J, Dega-Szafran Z, Szafran M (2009) J Mol Struct 918:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haussühl S, Jiyang W (1989) Z Kristallogr 187:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dörffel M, Narz T, Haussühl S (1989) Z Kristallogr 186:71–73Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alberts J (1988) Ferroelectrics 78:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zobetz E, Preisinger A (1989) Monatsch Chem 120:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maeda M (1988) J Phys Soc Jpn 57:2162–2167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schaack G (1990) Ferroelectrics 104:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baran J, Lis T, Pietraszko A, Ratajczak H (1993) Bull Pol Acad Sci Chem 41:235–241Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ilczyszyn MM, Ratajczak H (1996) J Mol Struct 375:23–35Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Baran J, Dega-Szafran Z, Jaskólski M, Marchewka MK, Ratajczak H, Szafran M (1997) J Mol Struct 406:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Góśniowska M, Cunik Z, Bator G, Jakubas R (1999) J Mol Struct 511-512:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nyrönen TH, Suontamo R, Pitkänen I (1999) Theor Chem Accounts 101:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ilczyszyn MM (2000) J Mol Struct 519:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ilczyszyn MM (2000) J Mol Struct 519:275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tadros W, Sakla AB (1954) J Chem Soc 1116–1119Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kosower EM, Patton JW (1961) J Org Chem 26:1318–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Edsall JT, Wyman Jr J (1935) J Am Chem Soc 57:1964–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hojo M, Utaka M, Yoshida Z (1971) Tetrahedron 27:4255–4262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Picha J, Cibulka R, Liška F, Pařik P, Pytela O (2004) Collect Czechoslov Chem Commun 69:2239–2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z, Kowalczyk I (2011) J Mol Struct 996:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z, Kowalczyk I (2011) J Mol Struct 1005:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Dega-Szafran Z, Kowalczyk I, Komasa A (2011) J Mol Struct 1006:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Szafran M, Katrusiak A, Kowalczyk I, Komasa A, Dega-Szafran Z (2012) J Mol Struct 1017:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wood GW, Collacott RJ (1983) Org Mass Spectrom 18:42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ostrowska K, Kowalczyk I, Kaźmierczak M, Katrusiak A, Szafran M, Komasa A, Dega-Szafran Z (2015) Cryst EngComm 17:4143–4149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sheldrick GM (2008) Acta Crystallogr A 64:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Macrae CF, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Shields GP, Taylor R, Towler M, van de Streek J (2006) J Appl Crystallogr 39:453–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith T, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2010) GAUSSIAN 09, Revision B.01. Gaussian Inc, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Becke AD (1997) J Chem Phys 107:8554–8560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lee C, Yang W, Parr GR (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PvR, Pople JA (1986) Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Feller D (1996) J Comp Chem 17:1571–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Schuchardt LL, Didler BT, Eisethagen T, Sun L, Gurumoorthi V, Chase J, Li J, Windus TL (2007) J Chem Inf Model 47:1045–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Glukhovtsev MN, Pross A, McGrath MP, Radom L (1995) J Chem Phys 103:1878–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Katrusiak A (2001) J Mol Graph Modell 19:363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ChemistryAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations