Strength of Materials

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 18–25 | Cite as

Compression Behavior of Biodegradable Thermoplastic Plasticizer-Containing Composites

  • A. F. GuoEmail author
  • J. F. Li
  • F. Y. Li
  • J. Xu
  • C. W. Zhang
  • S. Chen

Thermoplastic starch-based composites generate worldwide interest as they are based on green raw materials and undergo complete degradation. The composites were first fabricated from starch and sisal fibers as the major materials via the forming process. The effect of starches with different contents of single- and multicomponent plasticizers on the cushioning properties of the composites was studied. An increase in plasticizer contents within a certain range is shown to enhance materials resistance to pressure and its cushioning performance. With the multicomponent plasticizer content of 15%, the resistance to pressure for four types of composites prepared at different weight ratios of formamide and urea were of the order of 2:1 > 1:1 > 1:2, and that of the four types of composites fabricated at different weight ratios of glycerol and ethylene glycol were of the order of 1:2 > 2:1 > 1:1. Multicomponent plasticizer-containing starch-based composites are shown to be irregular elastomers and the stress-strain relation to be first defined by a hyperbolic tangent curve function and then by the tangent one.


biodegradation starch-based composite single/multicomponent plasticizers cushioning package compression behavior 



The authors gratefully appreciate the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51775318, 51305239, and 51275278), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Provincial (Nos. ZR2013EEQ010 and 2014ZRB019XH). We also appreciate the assistance of our colleagues from Shandong University, China.


  1. 1.
    W. W. Hu, X. H. Yu, Q. Hu, et al., “Methyl orange removal by a novel PEI-AuNPs-hemin nanocomposite,” J. Environ. Sci., 53, 278–283 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Y. Sun, Q. H. Xu, Y. Xie, et al., “High-efficient one-pot synthesis of carbon quantum dots decorating Bi2MoO6 nanosheets heterostructure with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic properties,” J. Alloy. Compd., 723, 333–344 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Q. L. Yue, Y. N. Hou, S. Z. Yue, et al., “Construction of an off-on fluorescence system based on carbon dots for trace pyrophosphate sensing,” J. Fluoresc., 25, 585–594 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Q. L. Yue, T. F. Shen, L. Wang, et al., “A convenient sandwich assay of thrombin in biological media using nanoparticle-enhanced fluorescence polarization,” Biosens. Bioelectron., 56, 231–236 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. F. Jia, H. Q. Li, Y. Zhao, et al., “Preparation and electrical properties of sintered copper powder compacts modified by polydopamine-derived carbon nanofilms,” J. Mater. Sci., 53, No. 9, 6562–6573 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. H. Song, M. X. Li, H. Qi, et al., “Impact of anti-acidification microbial consortium on carbohydrate metabolism of key microbes during food waste composting,” Bioresource Technol., 259, 1–9 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Gironès, E. F. X. Espinach, N. Pellicer, et al., “High-performance-tensile-strength alpha-grass reinforced starch-based fully biodegradable composites,” Bioresources, 8, No. 4, 6121–6135 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. L. Guimarães, F. Wypych, C. K. Saul, et al., “Studies of the processing and characterization of corn starch and its composites with banana and sugarcane fibers from Brazil,” Carbohyd. Polym., 80, No. 1, 130–138 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. P. S. Abdul Khalil, A. H. Bhat, and A. F. Ireana Yusra, “Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review,” Carbohyd. Polym., 87, No. 2, 963–979 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Chen, Q. Ji, L. Q. Kong, et al., “The electrochromic properties of an alternative copolymer containing benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b’] dithiophene as the electron donor and benzoselenadiazole as the electron acceptor units,” Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 12, No. 4, 3398–3416 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. W. Zhang, F. Y. Li, J. F. Li, et al., “Research on rheological behavior of biobased composite slurry composed of sisal fiber and thermoplastic oxidized starch,” J. Biobased. Mater. Bio., 11, No. 2, 119–124 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Zhang, X. L. Wang, Q. L. Wang, et al., “Hydride ion (H) transport behavior in barium hydride under high pressure,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, No. 13, 8917– 8923 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. Z. Wan, H. Luo, F. He, et al., “Mechanical, moisture absorption, and biodegradation behaviours of bacterial cellulose fibre-reinforced starch biocomposites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 69, Nos. 7–8, 1212–1217 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Liu, F. Y. Li, J. F. Li, et al., “Thermoplastic starch matrix plasticized by single/compound plasticizer in starch-based composites,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 45, No. 14, 14140–14144 (2014).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. F. Ma and J. G. Yu, “Thermoplastic starch plasticized by the mixture of urea and formamide,” Acta Polym. Sin., No. 4, 483–489 (2004).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    X. F. Ma and J. G. Yu, “Hydrogen bond of thermoplastic starch and effects on its properties,” Acta Chim. Sinica, 62, No. 12, 1180–1184 (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Aichholzer and H.-G. Fritz, “Rheological characterization of thermoplastic starch materials,” Starch-Starke, 50, No. 50, 77–83 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Della Valle, B. Vergnes, and D. Lourdin, “Viscous properties of thermoplastic starches from different botanical origin,” Int. Polym. Proc., 22, No. 5, 471–479 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. F. Guo, J. F. Li, F. Y. Li, and B. K. Wei, “Study on the biodegradagility of plant fiber and starch dishware,” J. Funct. Mater., 40, No. 11, 1929–1932 (2009).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Canché-Escamilla, M. Canché-Canché, S. Duarte-Aranda, et al., “Mechanical properties and biodegradation of thermoplastic starches obtained from grafted starches with acrylics,” Carbohyd. Polym., 86, No. 4, 1501–1508 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Ma, Y. L. Wang, J. Wan, and L. W. Zhang, “Common cushion packing materials static compress property testing study,” Packaging Eng., 23, No. 2, 4–8 (2002).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. L. Lu, “Research on static compression cushion curve of EPE polyethylene foaming material,” Packaging Eng., 28, No. 2, 42–44 (2007).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    X. Ming, Y. Zhao, J. Lu, and Q. L. Peng, “Contrast and analysis of packaging material cushioning performance based on static compression testing,” Packaging Eng., 27, No. 2, 59–61 (2006).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Guo, J. Zhao, J. Li, and K. Guan, “Forming parameters optimisation of biomass cushion packaging material by orthogonal test,” Mater. Res. Innov., 19, S5-521–S5-525 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    GB/T 8168-2008. Testing Method of Static Compression for Packaging Cushioning Materials.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Guo
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. F. Li
    • 2
  • F. Y. Li
    • 2
  • J. Xu
    • 2
  • C. W. Zhang
    • 2
  • S. Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical & Automobile EngineeringLiaocheng UniversityLiaochengChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations