Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Model of Multiple-Site Fatigue Damage of Riveting in Airframes

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

The probabilistic model of multiple-site damage of riveting in airframes is based on the statistical description of kinetics of the three fatigue fracture factors: time to crack initiation near the rivet hole, dimensional nonuniformity of flaws, and coalescence of counterpropagating cracks from neighboring holes. The probabilistic measure of these factors is used to determine time-dependent performance characteristics of a rivet joint: no-failure operation function and lifetime distribution function. The limiting state of the structure comes if at least one of the ligaments between the holes is fractured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Schijve, “Multiple-site damage in aircraft fuselage structures,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 18, No. 3, 329–344 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. R. Hendricks, “The Aloha airlines accident – a new era for aging aircraft,” in: S. N. Atluri, S. G. Sampath, and P. Tong (Eds.), Structural Integrity of Aging Airplanes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg (1991), pp. 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Method of Determining the Consistency with AP 25.571. Provision of Safety of the Construction as Regards the Strength during Long-Term Operation [in Russian], Mintrans, Moscow (1996).

  4. Recommendations for Regulatory Action to Prevent Widespread Fatigue Damage in the Commercial Airplane Fleet: a Report of the AAWG (Final Report), Airworthiness Assurance Working Group (1999).

  5. C. Boller, “Structural health management of ageing aircraft and other infrastructure,” in: Structural Health Monitoring, Institute of Smart Structures and Systems (ISSS), Bangalore, India (2002), pp. 1–59.

  6. A. Rambalakos and G. Deodatis, “Non-periodic inspection of aging aircraft structures,” in: Proc. 9th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conf. on Aging Aircraft (March 6–9, 2006, Atlanta, USA, GA) (2006), pp. 1–18.

  7. V. Pavelko and J. Timoshtchenko, “Model of the multi-site fatigue damage in the thin-walled structure,” in: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. “Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication” (Oct. 13–14, 2005, Riga, Latvia), Part 2, Riga (2005), pp. 327 –334.

  8. H. L. Wang and A. F. Grandt, “Monte Carlo analysis of widespread fatigue damage in lap joints,” in: A. F. Grandt, Jr., T. N. Farris, and B. H. Hillberry (Prep.), Analysis of Widespread Fatigue Damage in Aerospace Structures (Final Report for Air Force Office of Scientific Research), Purdue University (1999), p. 25.

  9. C. Proppe, “Probabilistic analysis of multi-site damage in aircraft fuselages,” Comp. Mech., 30, No. 4, 323–329 (2003).

  10. A. N. Garcia and P. E. Irving, “Lap joint MSD assessment using a probabilistic model,” in: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Fracture “Aeronautics & Aerospace” (March 20–25, 2005, Turin, Italy) (2005), pp. 74–79.

  11. G. Cavallini and R. Lazzeri, “A probabilistic approach to fatigue risk assessment in aerospace components,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 74, Issue 18, 2964–2970 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. U. G. Goranson, Damage Tolerance. Facts and Fiction, Keynote Presentation in Int. Conf. on Damage Tolerance of Aircraft Structure (Sept. 25, 2007, Delft, The Netherlands).

  13. J. H. Kim, G. Zi, S.-N. Van, et al., “Fatigue life prediction of multiple-site damage based on probabilistic equivalent initial flaw model,” Struct. Eng. Mech., 38, No. 4, 443–457 (2011).

  14. Handbook for Damage Tolerant Design, Section 3.2: Equivalent Initial Quality (2010), pp. 3.2.1–3.2.11.

  15. Durability Methods Development, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-79-3118, Vol. V: J. N. Yang, S. D. Manning, and W. R. Garver (Eds.), Durability Analysis Methodology Development, Structural and Design Department, GDC, Fort Worth, Texas, US (1979).

  16. J. N. Yang, “Statistical estimation of economic life for aircraft structures,” J. Aircraft, 17, No. 7, 528–535 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. C. Tong, Literature Review on Aircraft Structural Risk and Reliability Analysis, Technical Report DSTO-TR-1110, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory (2001).

  18. Joint Service Specification Guide for Aircraft Structures (JSSG-2006), Department of Defense of USA (1998).

  19. Handbook for Damage Tolerant Design, Section 1.3: Summary of Damage Tolerance Design Guidelines (2010), pp. 1.3.1–1.3.35.

  20. P. White, Review of Methods and Approaches for the Structural Risk Assessment of Aircraft, Technical Report DSTO-TR-1916, Defense Science and Technology Organisation (2006).

  21. S. R. Ignatovich, A. G. Kucher, A. S. Yakushenko, and A. V. Bashta, “Modeling of coalescence of dispersed surface cracks. Part 1. Probabilistic model for crack coalescence,” Strength Mater., 36, No. 2, 125–133 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. Ignatovich.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 3, pp. 48 – 58, May – June, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ignatovich, S.R. Probabilistic Model of Multiple-Site Fatigue Damage of Riveting in Airframes. Strength Mater 46, 336–344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-014-9555-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-014-9555-5

Keywords

Navigation