Statistics and Computing

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 383–392

A statistical test for Nested Sampling algorithms

Article

Abstract

Nested sampling is an iterative integration procedure that shrinks the prior volume towards higher likelihoods by removing a “live” point at a time. A replacement point is drawn uniformly from the prior above an ever-increasing likelihood threshold. Thus, the problem of drawing from a space above a certain likelihood value arises naturally in nested sampling, making algorithms that solve this problem a key ingredient to the nested sampling framework. If the drawn points are distributed uniformly, the removal of a point shrinks the volume in a well-understood way, and the integration of nested sampling is unbiased. In this work, I develop a statistical test to check whether this is the case. This “Shrinkage Test” is useful to verify nested sampling algorithms in a controlled environment. I apply the shrinkage test to a test-problem, and show that some existing algorithms fail to pass it due to over-optimisation. I then demonstrate that a simple algorithm can be constructed which is robust against this type of problem. This RADFRIENDS algorithm is, however, inefficient in comparison to MULTINEST.

Keywords

Nested sampling MCMC Bayesian inference Evidence Test Marginal likelihood 

References

  1. Aitken, S., Akman, O.E.: Nested sampling for parameter inference in systems biology: application to an exemplar circadian model. BMC Syst. Biol. 7(1), 72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaujean, F., Caldwell, A.: Initializing adaptive importance sampling with Markov chains. ArXiv (e-prints) (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Betancourt, M.: Nested sampling with constrained Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. In Mohammad-Djafari, A., Bercher, J.-F., & Bessiére, P. (eds.) American Institute of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1305, pp. 165–172. American Institute of Physics Conference Series (2011)Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, E., Pettitt, A.: Recursive pathways to marginal likelihood estimation with prior-sensitivity analysis. ArXiv e-prints (2013)Google Scholar
  5. Chopin, N., Robert, C.: Comments on nested sampling by john skilling. Bayesian Stat. 8, 491–524 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Chopin, N., Robert, C.P.: Properties of nested sampling. Biometrika. (2010)Google Scholar
  7. Evans, M.: Discussion of nested sampling for bayesian computations by john skilling. Bayesian Stat. 8, 491–524 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Feroz, F., Hobson, M.P.: Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for astronomical data analyses. MNRAS 384, 449–463 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feroz, F., Hobson, M.P., Bridges, M.: MULTINEST: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. MNRAS 398, 1601–1614 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., Cameron, E., Pettitt, A. N.: Importance nested sampling and the MultiNest algorithm. ArXiv e-prints. (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Mukherjee, P., Parkinson, D., Liddle, A.R.: A nested sampling algorithm for cosmological model selection. ApJ 638, L51–L54 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sivia, D., Skilling, J.: Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial. Oxford science publications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Skilling, J.: Nested sampling. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 735, p. 395. (2004)Google Scholar
  14. Skilling, J.: Nested sampling’s convergence. In: BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE ANDENGINEERING. The 29th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference andMaximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, vol. 1193, pp. 277–291. AIP Publishing, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  15. Skilling, J.: Bayesian computation in big spaces-nested sampling and galilean monte carlo. AIP Conf. Proc. 1443(1), 145–156 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische PhysikGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations