Abstract
Team teaching is a popular and intense form of teacher collaboration with several advantages for both students and teachers. To successfully implement team-based practices such as team teaching, previous studies highlight the pivotal role of teachers’ attitudes, which are subject to several personal and interpersonal processes. Stakeholders willing to implement team teaching require a deep understanding of teachers’ attitudes toward the practice and their relation to prominent (inter)personal variables in teacher collaboration research. To date, however, little quantitative research exists on teachers’ attitudes toward team teaching and even less on factors that may explain these attitudes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore how teachers value the implementation of team teaching in their teaching practices and to what extent prominent (inter)personal variables such as teachers’ self-efficacy, perceived collaboration, and team similarity are associated with these attitudes. The empirical data were collected through a cross-sectional survey (N = 555) conducted in Flanders (Belgium). The findings showed that teachers had a positive overall attitude toward team teaching, but this was not always strongly expressed. In particular, teachers’ attitudes toward enhancing the learning gains of students through team teaching were fairly neutral. Nonetheless, based on structural equation modeling, a proposed hypothetical model wherein self-efficacy beliefs, perceived collaboration, and team similarity were positively associated with teachers’ attitudes toward team teaching showed adequate predictive validity. Furthermore, all three of the studied factors had a significant effect on teachers’ attitudes, with teachers’ self-efficacy exerting the strongest effect.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. S., & Speck, B. W. (1998). “Oh what a difference a team makes”: Why team teaching makes a difference. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(7), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00021-3
Andronache, D., Bocoş, M., Bocoş, V., & Macri, C. (2014). Attitude towards teaching profession. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 628–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.677
De Backer, L., Simons, M., Schelfhout, W., & Vandervieren, E. (2021). Let’s team up! Measuring student teachers’ perceptions of team teaching experiences. In K. Ulas (Ed.), Teacher Education (pp. 1–22). IntechOpen.
Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2014). Student teachers’ team teaching: Models, effects, and conditions for implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.010
Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2016). Innovative field experiences in teacher education: Student-teachers and mentors as partners in teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(1), 38–51.
Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bas, G. (2022). Effect of student teachers’ teaching beliefs and attitudes towards teaching on motivation to teach: Mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.2006043
Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: The role of the facilitator. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247724
Bešić, E., Paleczek, L., Krammer, M., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2017). Inclusive practices at the teacher and class level: The experts’ view. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1240339
Burt, R. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
Bush, A., & Grotjohann, N. (2020). Collaboration in teacher education: A cross-sectional study on future teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration, their intentions to collaborate and their performance of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102968
Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9084-2
Cook, S. C., & McDuffie-Landrum, K. (2020). Integrating effective practices into co-teaching: Increasing outcomes for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(4), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219855739
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
de Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2019). School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102925
Decuyper, A., Tack, H., Vanblaere, B., Simons, M., & Vanderlinde, R. (2023). Collaboration and shared responsibility in team teaching: A large-scale survey study. Education Sciences, 13(9), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090896
Duran, D., Flores, M., Ribas, T., & Ribosa, J. (2021). Student teachers’ perceptions and evidence of peer learning through co-teaching: Improving attitudes and willingness towards co-teaching. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00479-0
Dziak, J. J., Coffman, D. L., Lanza, S. T., Li, R., & Jermiin, L. S. (2019). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 21(2), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz016
Ertesvåg, S. K. (2014). Teachers’ collaborative activity in school-wide interventions. Social Psychology of Education, 17(4), 565–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9262-x
Forte, A. M., & Flores, M. A. (2014). Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: A study of Portuguese teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.763791
Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., Penuel, W. R., Ellefson, N., & Porter, S. (2011). Focus, fiddle, and friends: Experiences that transform knowledge for the implementation of innovations. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711401812
García-Martínez, I., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Molina-Fernández, E., & Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2021). Mapping teacher collaboration for school success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1925700
Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & van der Veen, J. T. (2017). Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317704306
Goddard, Y., & Kim, M. (2018). Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000102
Hackett, J., Bang, M., Goulter, A., & Battista, M. (2019). Crossing risky boundaries: Learning to authentically and equitably co-teach through design and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102889
Hargreaves, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499
Härkki, T., Vartiainen, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). Co-teaching in non-linear projects: A contextualised model of co-teaching to support educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103188
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
Hettinger, K., Lazarides, R., Rubach, C., & Schiefele, U. (2021). Teacher classroom management self-efficacy: Longitudinal relations to perceived teaching behaviors and student enjoyment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103349
Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Johnson, T. M., King-Sears, M. E., & Miller, A. D. (2022). High school co-teaching partners’ self-efficacy, personal compatibility, and active involvement in instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720919811
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
Kolleck, N. (2019). Motivational aspects of teacher collaboration. Frontiers in Education, 4, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00122
Krammer, M., Rossmann, P., Gastager, A., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2018). Ways of composing teaching teams and their impact on teachers’ perceptions about collaboration. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1462331
Künsting, J., Neuber, V., & Lipowsky, F. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7
Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Li, C.-H. (2021). Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables. Behavior Research Methods, 53(5), 2191–2213. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01547-z
Lipscombe, K., Buckley-Walker, K., & McNamara, P. (2020). Understanding collaborative teacher teams as open systems for professional development. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1613256
Liu, Y., & Benoliel, P. (2022). National context, school factors, and individual teacher characteristics: Which matters most for teacher collaboration? Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103885
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
Marcoulides, G. A., & Drezner, Z. (2003). Model specification searches using ant colony optimization algorithms. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_8
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Muckenthaler, M., Tillmann, T., Weiß, S., & Kiel, E. (2020). Teacher collaboration as a core objective of school development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1747501
Nguyen, D., & Ng, D. (2020). Teacher collaboration for change: Sharing, improving, and spreading. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787206
Ning, H. K., Lee, D., & Lee, W. O. (2015). Relationships between teacher value orientations, collegiality, and collaboration in school professional learning communities. Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9294-x
Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/hb2g-m060
Pareja Roblin, N., & Margalef, L. (2013). Learning from dilemmas: Teacher professional development through collaborative action and reflection. Teachers and Teaching, 19(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.744196
Perrin, A.-L., Jury, M., & Desombre, C. (2021). Are teachers’ personal values related to their attitudes toward inclusive education? A correlational study. Social Psychology of Education, 24(4), 1085–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09646-7
Pratt, S. M., Imbody, S. M., Wolf, L. D., & Patterson, A. L. (2017). Co-planning in coteaching. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659474
Revelle, W. (2023). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.3.3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Rexroat-Frazier, N., & Chamberlin, S. (2019). Best practices in co-teaching mathematics with special needs students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(3), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12439
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sasson, I., & Malkinson, N. (2021). Co-teaching-based professional development: Self-efficacy, attitudes toward the profession, and pedagogical practices. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(6), 82–100.
Schuster, J., Hartmann, U., & Kolleck, N. (2021). Teacher collaboration networks as a function of type of collaboration and schools’ structural environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103372
Shin, M., Lee, H., & McKenna, J. W. (2016). Special education and general education preservice teachers’ co-teaching experiences: A comparative synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1074732
Siciliano, M. D. (2016). It’s the quality not the quantity of ties that matters: Social networks and self-efficacy beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216629207
Simons, M., & De Weerdt, D. (2022). How do learners perceive team teaching? Development and validation of the Learners' Team Teaching Perceptions Questionnaire (LTTPQ). In: 15th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain.
Simons, M., Coetzee, S., Baeten, M., & Schmulian, A. (2020). Measuring learners’ perceptions of a team-taught learning environment: Development and validation of the Learners’ Team Teaching Perceptions Questionnaire (LTTPQ). Learning Environments Research, 23(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09290-1
Strogilos, V., King-Sears, M. E., Tragoulia, E., Voulagka, A., & Stefanidis, A. (2023). A meta-synthesis of co-teaching students with and without disabilities. Educational Research Review, 38, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100504
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Walsh, T. (2022). ‘Promoted widely but not valued’: Teachers’ perceptions of team teaching as a form of professional development in post-primary schools in Ireland. Professional Development in Education, 48(4), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1725596
Whittaker, T., & Schumacker, R. (2022). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Routledge.
Wolgast, A., & Fischer, N. (2017). You are not alone: Colleague support and goal-oriented cooperation as resources to reduce teachers’ stress. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9366-1
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
Wray, E., Sharma, U., & Subban, P. (2022). Factors influencing teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103800
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. (2008). When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004
Funding
We received funding from Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO), the Research Foundation Flanders, as this study is part of the larger ESTAFETT project (www.teamteaching-estafett.be/english).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
De Weerdt, D., Simons, M. & Struyf, E. Teachers’ attitudes toward team teaching explained by teachers’ self-efficacy, perceived collaboration, and team similarity. Soc Psychol Educ 27, 2479–2502 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09916-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09916-0


