Skip to main content
Log in

The homophily and centrality of LGBQ youth: A new story?

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social acceptance of LGBQ individuals changed dramatically over the past several decades, which calls into question extant research suggesting that LGBQ youth are often socially excluded. The current study utilizes quantitative social network analysis techniques to examine the peer group homophily and social centrality of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning (LGBQ) students in two junior high schools. Results suggest that LGBQ students were more likely to be in peer groups with at least one other LGBQ individual. LGBQ students’ centrality was the same as heterosexual students within their peer group as well as their peer group’s perceived popularity across the whole school. These results suggest that LGBQ students today may not experience the same social exclusion as past generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. We ran additional analyses examining whether LGBQ students having 1, 2, or 3 sexual identity factors related with peer group centrality and within group centrality. Results suggest there was no difference in the number of indicators and peer group centrality, χ2 (4, 62) = 1.27, p = .87, nor within group centrality, χ2 (4, 62) = 3.48, p = .48.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the role that Dr. David B. Estell played in the formation of this paper before passing away on February 19, 2019. This manuscript would not have been possible without his guidance and mentorship toward his students and mentees. David is deeply missed. Portions of this manuscript were first presented at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Funding

There are no funding sources for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin H. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no known conflicts of interest for this paper.

Ethical approval

All ethical guidelines were followed in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Sexual identity questions

Attraction

What best describes your feelings?

    (a) I am only attracted to girls

    (b) I am mostly attracted to girls

    (c) I am equally attracted to girls and boys

    (d) I am mostly attracted to boys

    (e) I am only attracted to boys

    (f) I am not attracted to other people

    (g) I am not sure who I am attracted to

    (h) Another (please write in): _____________________

    (i) I do not want to answer

Behavior

What best describes who you have kissed or more-than-kissed?

    (a) I have not kissed or more-than-kissed anyone

    (b) Only girls

    (c) Only boys

    (d) Both girls and boys

    (e) Not sure

    (f) Another (please write in): _____________________

    (g) I do not want to answer

Category

Some people feel comfortable labeling their sexual orientation. What label do you use for yourself?

    (a) Heterosexual or straight

    (b) Gay boy

    (c) Lesbian or gay girl

    (d) Bisexual

    (e) Queer

    (f) Questioning

    (g) Not sure

    (h) Another (please write in): _____________________

    (i) I do not want to answer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, M.H., Hackel, T.S. & Gross, R.A. The homophily and centrality of LGBQ youth: A new story?. Soc Psychol Educ 25, 1157–1175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09720-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09720-8

Keywords

Navigation