Skip to main content

Adding the culturally specific ingredients: the Chinese and American models of learning persistence, including learning beliefs, choice and the internalization of learning motivation

Abstract

This study challenged the widely spread assumption that East Asian students are more persistent than their American counterparts because they are more likely to believe that success results from efforts rather than innate ability. The examination was conducted through comparing the impact of three factors— internalization of learning motivation, learning beliefs, and preference of choice—on learning persistence between 888 Chinese and 361 American college students represent East Asian and Western students respectively. Structural equation modeling was conducted to testify the culturally specific pathways towards persistence. The findings suggested that American and Chinese students were sharing two common factors (integrated internalization and belief in effort) that predict their persistence significantly. Moreover, there are also differences between Chinese and American students. Guilty and having choice are significant factors for Chinese students’ learning persistence, while ego is a significant factor for American students’ persistence. Such results suggested that the East Asian students are not more persistence and their education model should not be imported by other countries even though they perform better in international large-scale assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

Research data can be provided by the author upon request.

References

  1. Becker, D. A. (1997). The Effects of Choice on Auditors’ Intrinsic Motivation and Performance (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2918). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2918

  2. Blackwell, L. S. (2002) Psychological mediators of student achievement during the transition to junior high school: the role of implicit theories Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.

  3. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvo, T. G., Cervelló, E., Jiménez, R., Iglesias, D., & Murcia, J. A. M. (2010). Using self-determination theory to explain sport persistence and dropout in adolescent athletes. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky’s Educational Theory Cultural Context, 1, 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandler, T. A., Shama, D. D., Wolf, F. M., & Planchard, S. K. (1981). Multiattributional causality: A five cross-national samples study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, T. (1998). Confucian ideology and business administration. Chinese culture and industrial management, 187–192.

  8. Cheng, K., & Wong, K. (1996). School effectiveness in East Asia: Concepts, origins and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239610148269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: a meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Castella, K., & Byrne, D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431–441). University of Rochester Press.

  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/psychologie Canadienne, 49, 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diamond, A., Kirkham, N., & Amso, D. (2002). Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response. Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.352.

  17. Dweck, C. (2015). Carol Dweck revisits the growth mindset. Education Week, 35(5), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emler, T. E., Zhao, Y., Deng, J., Yin, D., & Wang, Y. (2019). Side Effects of large-scale assessments in education. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flowerday, T., & Schraw, G. (2000). Teacher beliefs about instructional choice: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2014). The history of self-determination theory in psychology and management. In M. Gagné (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 1–9). Oxford: University Press.

  22. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallschmid, C. A. (1977). Intrinsic motivation: the effects of task choice, reward magnitude and reward choice. [Doctoral dissertation: University of Alberta].

  24. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers and Education, 80, 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harlow, H. F. (1954). Learning theory, personality theory, and clinical research. In Kentucky Symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 36–53). Wiley: Oxford.

  27. Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in japan and north america: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hess, R. D., Chang, C. M., & McDevitt, T. M. (1987). Cultural variations in family beliefs about children’s performance in mathematics: Comparisons among People’s Republic of China, Chinese-American, and Caucasian-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holloway, S. D. (1988). Concepts of ability and effort in Japan and the United States. Review of Educational Research, 58(3), 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Howard, M. C., & Crayne, M. P. (2019). Persistence: Defining the multidimensional construct and creating a measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, G. H. C., & Gove, M. (2015). Confucianism, Chinese families, and academic achievement: exploring how Confucianism and Asian descendant parenting practices influence children’s academic achievement. In Science education in East Asia (pp. 41–66). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995.

  34. Jõesaar, H., Hein, V., & Hagger, M. S. (2011). Peer influence on young athletes’ need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and persistence in sport: A 12-month prospective study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(5), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Johns, J., & Woolf, B. (2006). A dynamic mixture model to detect student motivation and proficiency. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 21, No. 1, p. 163). Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999.

  36. Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kingston, E., & Forland, H. (2008). Bridging the gap in expectations between international students and academic staff. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(2), 204–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

  39. Lam, F. (2011). The Socratic method as an approach to learning and its benefits.

  40. Lee, S. Y., Ichikawa, V., & Stevenson, H. W. (1987). Beliefs and achievement in mathematics and reading: A cross-national study of Chinese, Japanese, and American children and their mothers. Advances in Motivation, 7, 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Marinak, B. (2004). The effects of reward proximity and choice of reward on the reading motivation of third-grade students (Doctoral dissertation).

  43. Maruoka, S. (2013). East Asian Students’ Autonomy in EFL Classrooms. Accents Asia, 6(1), 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Morris, C. (1987). The discovery of the individual (Vol. 5, pp. 1050–1200). Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion; New York, 25(4), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Provasnik, S., Malley, L., Stephens, M., Landeros, K., Perkins, R. and Tang, J. H. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Students in Grades 4 and 8 and in Advanced Courses at the End of High School in an International Context. (2016, November 29). Retrieved March 5th, 2018, from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017002

  49. Renaud-Dubé, A., Guay, F., Talbot, D., Taylor, G., & Koestner, R. (2015). The relations between implicit intelligence beliefs, autonomous academic motivation, and school persistence intentions: A mediation model. Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15(3), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. Elsevier.

  52. Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 Insights and interpretations. Retrieved December 24th, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf

  53. Self-Determination Theory: Perceived Choice and Awareness of Self Scale (PCASS). Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/pcass/

  54. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., & Mu, X. (2000). Successful achievement in mathematics: China and the United States. In C. F. M. Van Lieshout & P. G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talent across the lifespan (pp.167–183). Taylor and Francis Inc.

  55. Stigler, J. W., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1987). Mathematics classrooms in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Child Development, 1272–1285.

  56. Telzer, E. H., Qu, Y., & Lin, L. C. (2017). Neural processes underlying cultural differences in cognitive persistence. NeuroImage, 156, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Handbook of Self-Determination Research, 128, 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G. J., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (2018). Fostering personal meaning and self-relevance: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, Y. (2019). Exploring Pathways of Western and East Asian Students’ Persistence in Learning: The Role of Learning Beliefs, Choice, and Internationalization of Learning Motivation. University of Kansas Doctoral Dissertation.

  62. Wang, Y., & Wind, S. A. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of a new internalization of learning motivation (ILM) scale. Current Psychology, 1–18.

  63. Xi, Z., & Liu, Z. (2004). Dui “ji chu” yu “chuang xin” guan xi de chong xin ren shi. [Re-discover the relationship between ‘foundation’ and ‘creativity’]. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 24(5), 30–33. Retrieved from http://202.116.42.39/kcyjxl/wlkc/sskc/upload/article/2009122222075759.pdf

  64. Yang, C. H. E. N. (2009). A functional analysis of quotations from Lun Yu. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2. Retrieved from https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotalWYWJ200902012.htm

  65. Yin, H. B. (2013). Societal culture and teachers’ responses to curriculum reform: experiences from China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1189–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Chapter 4-self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning (pp. 105–125). San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012554255-5/50005-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the institution Summer Research Grant (no Grant Number).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yurou Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. Research was approved by the Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) at the University of Kansas.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Yes. The consent for publication was retrieved from participants

Consent to participate

Yes. The consent information was provided to all the participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y. Adding the culturally specific ingredients: the Chinese and American models of learning persistence, including learning beliefs, choice and the internalization of learning motivation. Soc Psychol Educ (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09672-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Persistence
  • Learning beliefs
  • Choice
  • Internalization
  • Motivation