Skip to main content

The interest gap: how gender stereotype endorsement about abilities predicts differences in academic interests

Social Psychology of Education volume 22, pages 227–245 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

This study used a novel approach to examine the link between gender ability stereotype endorsement and academic interests by examining not only stereotypes people hold within the domains of mathematics and language arts, but also between them. Grade 6 and 8 students (285 males, 363 females) reported their degree of stereotype endorsement and interest in these two academic domains. Results of path analyses revealed that stereotype endorsement within and between domains accounted for gender differences in interest. In language arts, endorsing a stereotype that females are more competent than males predicted subsequent interest in the domain and accounted for the greater language arts interest among females. In mathematics, however, the perception that males are more competent in mathematics relative to language arts was linked to students’ interest in this domain and accounted for the interest gap between genders. These results suggest that students’ interests relate to endorsed stereotypes that are either driven by a perceived gender superiority within one domain—when females are viewed as more competent than males in language arts—or a gender superiority between two domains—when males are viewed as more competent in mathematics relative to language arts. Considering not only stereotypes favoring a gender within one domain, but also between domains, provides a more accurate portrait of students’ actual stereotypes and can be useful to better understanding how the interest gap emerges.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 user’s guide. Pennsylvania, PA: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, H., Christie, C., & Dye, M. (2002). Social identity versus reference frame comparisons: The moderating role of stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnot, V., & Croizet, J.-C. (2007). Stereotype internalization and women’s math measure to assess students’ career intentions. Given that one-item performance: The role of interference in working memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 857–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, A., Eccles, J. S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1612–1628. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, A., & Salmera-Aro, K. (2011). Task-values across subject domains: A gender comparison using a person-centered approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school chidlren. Child Development, 82(3), 766–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denissen, J. J., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78(2), 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durik, A. M., Lindeman, M. H., & Coley, S. L. (2017). The power within: How individual interest promotes domain-relevant task engagement. In P. A. O’Keefe & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), The Science of Interest. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task-value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement- related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). Guilford: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-016.

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Gardner, P. L. (1999). The Fennema-Sherman mathematics as a male domain scale reexamined. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galdi, S., Cadinu, M., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). The roots of stereotype threat: When automatic associations disrupt girls’ math performance. Child Development, 85(1), 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Tisher, R., Ainley, M., & Kennedy, G. (2008). Staying with the text: The contribution of gender, achievement orientations, and interest to students’ performance on a literacy task. Educational Psychology, 28(7), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802260988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 575–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(22), 8801–8807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips, H. M. (2005). Sex & gender: An introduction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., & Ruble, D. (2010). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinot, D., & Désert, M. (2007). Awareness of a gender stereotype, personal beliefs and self-perceptions regarding math ability: When boys do not surpass girls. Social Psychology of Education, 10(4), 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1124–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, P. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2017). The science of interest. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, P. A., Horberg, E. J., & Plante, I. (2017). The multifaceted role of interest in motivation and engagement. In P. A. O’Keefe & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), The science of interest. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55509-6_3

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2014 (p. 570). Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.sourceocde.org/enseignement/9264011927.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015), Indicator A10 where are the gender gaps in education and employment? In Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-16-en.

  • Passolunghi, M. C., Ferreira, T. I. R., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). Math-gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence. Learning and Individual differences, 34, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, C. R., Heim, D., Levy, A. R., & Larkin, D. T. (2016). Twenty years of stereotype threat research: A review of psychological mediators. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0146487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillow, W. S. (2002). Gender matters: Feminist research in educational evaluation. New Direction for Evaluation, 96, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, I. (2010). Adaptation and validation of instruments to measure gender stereotypes in mathematics and French. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 33(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024894ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, I., De la Sablonnière, R., Aronson, J. M., & Théorêt, M. (2013a). Gender stereotype endorsement and achievement-related outcomes: The role of competence beliefs and task values. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, I., Favreau, E. O., & Théorêt, M. (2009). Student gender stereotypes: Contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology, 29(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902971500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, I., O’Keefe, P. A., & Théorêt, M. (2013b). The relation between achievement goal and expectancy-value theories in predicting achievement-related outcomes: A test of four theoretical conceptions. Motivation & Emotion, 37(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, I., Théorêt, M., & Favreau, E. O. (2010). Gender stereotypes in mathematics and language arts: A critical review with regard to school achievement. Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, 36(2), 389–419. https://doi.org/10.7202/044483ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (2011). Intraclass correlation coefficients in hierarchical designs: Evaluation using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.534319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, S. J., Kurtz-Costes, B., Mistry, R., & Feagans, L. (2007). Social status as a predictor of race and gender stereotypes in late childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 16(1), 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: comparing implicit mathegender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 947–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoman, D. B., Arizaga, J. A., Smith, J. L., Story, T. S., & Soncuya, G. (2013). The grass is greener in non-science, technology, engineering, and math classes: Examining the role of competing belonging to undergraduate women’s vulnerability to being pulled away from science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vezeau, C., Chouinard, R., Bouffard, T., & Couture, N. (1998). Adaptation and validation of the Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales among high school boys and girls. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 30(2), 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. (2005). Exploring adolescent motivations for pursuing maths-related careers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The “Boy Turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073004471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement striving. In Review of educational research (Vol. 64, pp. 557–573). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004557.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a postdoctoral scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [scholarship number 756-2009-0381] to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada

    Isabelle Plante & Catherine Fréchette-Simard

  2. Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore

    Paul A. O’Keefe

  3. New York University, New York, USA

    Joshua Aronson

  4. Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

    Mélissa Goulet

Authors
  1. Isabelle Plante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul A. O’Keefe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joshua Aronson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Catherine Fréchette-Simard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mélissa Goulet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Plante.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plante, I., O’Keefe, P.A., Aronson, J. et al. The interest gap: how gender stereotype endorsement about abilities predicts differences in academic interests. Soc Psychol Educ 22, 227–245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9472-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9472-8

Keywords

  • Gender ability stereotypes
  • Achievement motivation
  • Gender differences
  • Interest