Is two better than one? Comparing children’s narrative competence in an individual versus joint storytelling task
- 83 Downloads
This research looks at the potential of peer interaction practices in improving narrative competence by analyzing the efficacy of peer learning on children’s oral narrative productions. Gains on a macro-level (structure and coherence of the narrative) and a micro-level (cohesion of the narrative) were analyzed. Fifty-six primary school children participated in this study. Each child told a narrative either individually (individual condition) or while interacting with a peer (joint condition). We explored whether children produced longer, more structured, coherent and cohesive narratives in a joint condition rather than individually, and in which condition the joint task was more beneficial for children’s narrative competence in terms of narrative scores in the individual condition, discrepancy between the members of the same pair, and quality of the interaction. The advantage of peer learning does not derive from the direct comparison of the individual versus the joint condition but depends on specific conditions: the joint condition was beneficial for individuals with lower individual competence and for pairs with a high discrepancy between individual scores. Children’s quality of interaction did not seem to influence the efficacy of peer learning on their narrative competence.
KeywordsNarrative competence Peer learning Preschoolers Story-telling
- De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2015). Socially shared metacognitive regulation during reciprocal peer tutoring: identifying its relationship with students’ content processing and transactive discussions. Instructional Science, 43, 323–344. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in english. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Hudson, J. A., & Shapiro, L. R. (1991). From knowing to telling: The development of children’s scripts, stories and personal narratives. In A. McCabe & C. Peterson (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 89–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1991). Developing narrative structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, D. K., Pearce, M. J., & Pick, J. L. (2004). Preschool children’s narratives and performance on the peabody individualized achievement test—revised: Evidence of a relation between early narrative and later mathematical ability. First Language, 24, 149–183. doi: 10.1177/0142723704043529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roch, M., Florit, E., & Levorato, C. (2016). Narrative competence of Italian–English bilingual children between 5 and 7 years. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 49–67. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000417.
- Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1982). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In W. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 255–282). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.