Dimensions of teacher burnout: relations with potential stressors at school
The purpose of this study was to analyze how four potential stressors in the school environment (discipline problems, time pressure, low student motivation, and value dissonance) were related to dimensions of teacher burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment). Participants were 1145 teachers from grade 1 to 13. Data were analyzed by means of confirmatory factor analysis and SEM analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis including the four stressors and the three dimensions of burnout had good fit to the data and the correlations between the factors were moderate. Although all the potential stressors were significantly related to emotional exhaustion, time pressure was the far strongest predictor. In comparison, depersonalization and personal accomplishment was not significantly related to time pressure but was significantly predicted by discipline problems, low student motivation, and value dissonance. Teachers at the lowest grade levels reported more discipline problems and higher time pressure than teachers at higher grade levels, whereas teachers at the highest grade levels experienced low student motivation as a greater problem than teachers at lower grade levels.
KeywordsTeacher burnout Discipline problems Time pressure Student motivation Educational values
This research was supported by a grant from the Union of Education Norway.
- Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Klassen, R., Wilson, E., Siu, A. F. Y., Hannok, W., Wong, M. W., Wongsri, N., et al. (2013). Preservice teachers’ work stress, self-efficacy, and occupational commitment in four countries. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1289–1309. doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-0166-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Köber, T., Risberg, T., & Texmon, T. (2005). Hvor jobber førskolelærere og lærere? In Utdanning (pp. 232–253) Oslo: Statistics Norway. http://www.ssb.no/emner/04/sa_utdanning/arkiv/sa74/kap-11.pdf.
- Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: CPP Inc.Google Scholar
- Pines, A. M., & Aronson, E. (1988). Career Burnout. Causes and Cures. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611–625. doi: 10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1241.
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001.
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011a). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1029–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001.
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011b). Teachers’ feeling of belonging, exhaustion, and job satisfaction: The role of goal structure and value consonance. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping. An international Journal, 24, 369–385. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2010.544300.
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2012). Skolen som arbeidsplass. Trivsel, mestring og utfordringer. [School as a workplace for teachers]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2016). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation to leave the teaching profession. Creative Education, 7, 1785–1799. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.713182.
- Smithers, A., & Robinson, P. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ decisions to leave the profession. Liverpool: University of Liverpool, Centre for Education and Employment Research, Department for Education and Skills, Research Report RR430.Google Scholar