Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 601–618 | Cite as

‘Everyone has their own qualities’: tracking and academic self-appraisal in Flemish secondary education

  • Lore Van PraagEmail author
  • Jannick Demanet
  • Peter A. J. Stevens
  • Mieke Van Houtte
Article

Abstract

Track position has an impact on students’ perceptions of educational success. These perceptions matter as they relate to educational and professional aspirations and choices. In this ethnographic study, based on ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews in three secondary schools in Flanders (northern part of Belgium), we want to increase our understanding of the combination of within- and between track comparisons for students’ perceptions of their educational success. The hierarchical nature of the Flemish educational system is reflected in students’ comparison groups to evaluate their school success. In academic tracks, most students considered their educational career automatically as successful, regardless of their actual grades. Conversely, students in vocational tracks developed more contradictory feelings with respect to their personal school success and felt the need to distinguish themselves from their classmates. Thus, regardless the existence of different school cultures across tracks, students searched for strategies to define themselves as successful in school.

Keywords

Secondary education Tracking system Belgium Success 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Flanders Research Foundation (FWO) under Grant FWO09/ASP/098.

References

  1. Boone, S., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). In search of the mechanisms conducive to class differentials in educational choice: A mixed method research. Sociological Review, 61(3), 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chmielewski, A. K., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type. An international comparison of students’ mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 925–957. doi: 10.3102/0002831213489843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clycq, N., Nouwen, W., & Vandenbroucke, A. (2014). Meritocracy, deficit thinking and the invisibility of the system: Discourses on educational success and failure. British Educational Research Journal, 40(5), 796–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys—The culture of the gang. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22(4), 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. The American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). Grade retention and its association with school misconduct in adolescence: A multilevel approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(4), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganzeboom, H., & Treiman, D. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification. Social Science Research, 25(3), 201–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 900–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (2007). Secondary school pupils’ satisfaction with their ability grouping placements. British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallinan, M. T. (1994). Tracking—From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, D. H. (1967). Social relations in a secondary school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer? Oxford Review of Education, 25, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown grammar. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 326–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Craven, R. (2004). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny. American Psychologist, 59(4), 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 691–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nouwen, W., & Clycq, N. (2016). The role of teacher-pupil relations in stereotype threat effects in Flemish secondary education. Urban Education. doi: 10.1177/0042085916646627.Google Scholar
  24. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Richer, S. (1976). Reference group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research. Sociology of Education, 49(1), 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenbaum, J. E., & Kariya, T. (1991). Do school achievements affect the early jobs of high school graduates in the United States and Japan? Sociology of Education, 64(2), 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shavelson, R., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., De Vinney, L. C., Leland, C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). Studies in social psychology in World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  31. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluaton maintenance model of social behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, 23–27 AugustGoogle Scholar
  32. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., & Nagy, G. (2009). Within-School social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 853–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Houtte, M. (2005). Global self-esteem in technical/vocational versus general secondary school tracks: A matter of gender? Sex Roles, 53(9–10), 753–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Houtte, M. (2006). School type and academic culture: Evidence for the differentiation–polarization theory. Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Houtte, M., Demanet, J., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). Study involvement of academic and vocational students: Does between-school tracking sharpen the difference? American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 943–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2010). The culture of futility and its impact on study culture in technical/vocational schools in Belgium. Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2015). Tracking and sense of futility: The impact of between-school tracking versus within-school tracking in secondary education in Flanders (Belgium). British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 782–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Praag, L., Boone, S., Stevens, P. A. J., & Van Houtte, M. (2015). De paradox van het watervalsysteem: Wanneer het groeperen van studenten in homogene groepen tot meer heterogeniteit leidt in het beroepsonderwijs. Sociologos, 36(2), 82–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations