Empirical studies have revealed that teachers face problems when assessing task difficulty for their students. By drawing on research that focuses on how individuals assess what others know, we argue that these difficulties are a consequence of the imputation of one’s own knowledge to others (i.e., social projection). In particular, we tested the assumption that individuals impute more of their own knowledge to others, the more they elaborate what these others might know. In a first experiment, students were asked to judge task difficulty for their best friend. In the second experiment, teacher trainees were asked to assess task difficulty for 9th graders. Results revealed that individuals, who deeply elaborated when assessing task difficulty for another person, more closely relied on their own rating of task difficulty than individuals with a lower elaboration depth. These findings support the notion that social projection becomes stronger, the deeper individuals elaborate.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ames, D. R. (2004). Strategies for social inference: A similar contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 573–585.
Brenner, L., & Bilgin, B. (2011). Preferences, projection, and packing: Support theory models of judgments of others’ preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 121–132.
Cho, J. C., & Knowles, E. D. (2013). I’m like you and you’re like me: Social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self-other correspondence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 444–456.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science. Mahaw, NJ: Erlbaum.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgement accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 91–98.
Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (1998). Teachers’ ability to estimate item difficulty: A test of the assumptions in the Angoff standard setting method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35(1), 69–81.
Kawada, C. L. K., Oettinger, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). The projection of implicit and explicit goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 545–559.
Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience vs. analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 157–175.
Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72–90.
Neugebauer, M., Helbig, M., & Landmann, A. (2011). Unmasking the myth of the same-sex teacher advantage. European Sociological Review, 27(5), 669–689.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737–759.
Nickerson, R. S., Baddeley, A., & Freeman, B. (1987). Are people’s estimates of what other people know influenced by what they themselves know? Acta Psychologica, 64(3), 245–259.
PISA-Konsortium Deutschland. (2003). PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. Münster u.a: Waxmann.
PISA-Konsortium Deutschland, (2006). PISA 2006: Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichs. Münster u.a: Waxmann.
Stanley, J. C. (1971). Reliability. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 356–442). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Van de Watering, G., & van de Rijt, J. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of assessments: A review and a study into the ability and accuracy of estimating the difficulty levels of assessment items. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 133–147.
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects of susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 798–810.
Studies reported in this article were supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) to the second (DI 929/2_2) and third author (RE 2218/1_2).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ann Krispenz, Oliver Dickhäuser and Marc-André Reinhard have contributed equally to this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Krispenz, A., Dickhäuser, O. & Reinhard, MA. Assessing task difficulty for other people: when deeper evaluation means “it’s more about me!”. Soc Psychol Educ 19, 865–877 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9341-2
- Task difficulty
- Working model of other’s knowledge
- Social projection
- Elaboration depth