Abstract
The literature on cyber aggression is advancing, revealing many risk factors associated with the involvement in these behaviors. Academic correlates, particularly academic performance, have received some attention, with few studies utilizing longitudinal designs. The present study examined these associations among 673 8th graders (51 % female) from middle schools in the United States. Findings revealed that cyber aggression perpetration and cyber victimization each related positively to poor academic performance, absenteeism, and school behavioral problems, assessed one and a half years later (T2), while controlling for face-to-face aggression and victimization and Time 1 school related variables. Significant interactions suggested that at higher levels of cyber victimization, Time 2 academic performance and cyber aggression perpetration were more strongly associated. In addition, the relationship between cyber aggression perpetration and Time 2 school behavioral problems was stronger when adolescents had higher levels of cyber victimization. These results suggest that adolescents who were both perpetrators and victims of cyber aggression had poorer academic performance and more behavioral problems at school one and a half years later.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 803–833. doi:10.1177/0272431609350927.
Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(2), 15–33.
Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Bulter, D., & Kift, S. (2012). Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying and the psychosocial correlates of their victimization. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 389–401. doi:10.1080/13632752.2012.704316.
Feinberg, T., & Robey, N. (2008). Cyberbullying. Principal Leadership, 9(1), 10–14.
Grigg, D. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 143–156. doi:10.1375/ajgc.20.2143.
Huang, Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1581–1590. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.006.
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 349–359. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.349.
Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying in chatrooms: Who are the victims? Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25–36. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.25.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13–S20. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018.
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170. doi:10.1177/0143034306064547.
Mitchell, K., Ybarra, M., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, & substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12(4), 314–324. doi:10.1177/1077559507305996.
Nishina, A., Juvonen, J., & Witkow, M. R. (2005). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will make me feel sick: The psychosocial, somatic, and scholastic consequences of peer harassment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 37–48. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_4.
Ozkol, H., Zucker, M., & Spinazolla, J. (2011). Pathways to aggression in urban elementary school youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(6), 733–748. doi:10.1002/jcop.20464.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 123–147. doi:10.1177/1541204006286288.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 43(2), 727–775. doi:10.1177/0044118X10366951.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81–94. doi:10.1002/ab.20336.
Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). ‘I h 8 u’: Findings from a 5-year study of text and e-mail bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 543–671. doi:10.1080/01411920903071918.
Saarento, S., Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Classroom- and school-level contributions to bullying and victimization: A review. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. doi:10.1002/casp.2207.
Schenk, A. M., Fremouw, W. J., & Keelan, C. M. (2013). Characteristics of college cyberbullies. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2320–2327. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.013.
Sontag, L. M., Clemans, K. H., Graber, J. A., & Lyndon, S. (2011). Traditional and cyber aggressors and victims: A comparison of psychosocial characteristics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(4), 392–404. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9575-9.
Thijs, J., & Verkuyten, M. (2008). Peer victimization and academic achievement in a multiethnic sample: The role of perceived academic self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 754–764. doi:10.1037/a0013155.
Topcu, C., & Erdur-Baker, O. (2012). Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International, 33(5), 550–561. doi:10.1177/0143034312446882.
Wright, M. F. (2014). Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents’ popularity and cyber social behaviors. Journal of School Violence, 13(3), 291–314. doi:10.1080/15388220.2013.849201.
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 662–674. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3.
Wright, M. F., Li, Y., & Shi, J. (2012). Chinese adolescents’ social status goals: Associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression. Youth & Society. doi:10.1177/0044118X12448800.
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressors, victims, and aggressor/victims: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316.
Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2007). Internet prevention messages: Are we targeting the right online behaviors? Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 161, 138–145.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the project “Employment of Best Young Scientists for International Cooperation Empowerment” (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0037) co-financed from European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, M.F. Adolescents’ cyber aggression perpetration and cyber victimization: the longitudinal associations with school functioning. Soc Psychol Educ 18, 653–666 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9318-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9318-6


