Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’ collaborative activity in school-wide interventions

Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Despite the strong interest in research about collaboration among teachers, there are few longitudinal studies that have investigated improvements in collaborative activity among teachers through school-wide interventions. Drawing on data from a larger study, this article describes improvements in collaborative activity among 900 teachers at 28 Norwegian schools. The schools participated in two interventions aiming to strengthen classroom management and to prevent and reduce problem behavior. Collaborative activity was a main implementation strategy in both interventions. The impacts of both school- and teacher-level factors were investigated through latent multilevel growth curve models. Although the results indicated that teachers in both interventions improved in collaborative activity, the teachers who participated in one of the interventions improved more than teachers in the other. The teacher- and school-level factors perceived learning environment, initial collaborative activity, work experience and intervention were associated with baseline and/or growth rate results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significans tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, S. S., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2007). Professional learning communities and communities of practice: A comparison of models, literature review. Paper presented at Online Submission. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development international research conference in the Americas Indianapolis, IN, Feb 28–Mar 4.

  • Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2005). Teacher–student relationships across the teaching career, chapter 4. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bru, E. (2006). Factors associated with disruptive behaviour in the classroom: Findings form a Norwegian study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, C. (2005). Establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships between regular and special education teachers in middle school social studies inclusive classrooms. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Cognition and leaving indivers settings: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 18, pp. 153–198). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 20(5), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.-L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clunies-Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1992). Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront? American Journal of Education, 100(3), 298–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conoley, J. C., & Conoley, C. W. (2010). Why does collaboration work? Linking positive psychology and collaboration. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmovici, E. M., Idsoe, T., Bru, E., & Munthe, E. (2009). Perceptions of learning environment and on-task orientation among students reporting different achievement levels: A study conducted among Norwegian secondary school students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., Eaker, R., National Educational Service, B. I. N., Association for Supervision, & Curriculum Development, A. V. A. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement.

  • Enthoven, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2010). Beyond locality: The creation of public practice-based knowledge through practitioner research in professional learning communities and communities of practice. a review of three books on practitioner research and professional communities. Educational Action Research, 18(2), 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertesvåg, S. K. (2009). Classroom leadership. The effect of a school development programme. Educational Psychology, 29(5), 515–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertesvåg, S. K. (2011). Measuring authoritative teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertesvåg, S. K. & Roland, E. (submitted). Professional cultures and rates of bullying.

  • Ertesvåg, S. K., & Vaaland, G. S. (2007). Prevention and reduction of behavioural problems in school: A pilot evaluation of the respect programme. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 713–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as a field of inquiry handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. D., DePaulo, B. M., & Nadler, A. (1981). Extending altruism beyond the altruistic act: The mixed effects of ai on the help recipient. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrento (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives (pp. 367–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, Routledge: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. E., & McMullen, P. A. (1982). The helping seeking process. In V. J. Derlenga & J. Grzelek (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 15–42). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 967–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, T. (2007). Building capacity for school improvement. In R. Bacchetti & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Reconnecting education & foundations: Turning good intentions into educational capital (pp. 165–183). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning—A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindin, A., Morocco, C. C., Mott, E. A., & Aguilar, C. M. (2007). More than just a group: Teacher collaboration and learning in the workplace. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 13(4), 349–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J., & Appleton, K. (2007). The effect of a mentoring model for elementary science professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinos, C. M. (2007). Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large scale reform. The effects om students, teachern, and the classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2007). Closing the achievement gap through teacher collaboration: Facilitating multiple trajectories of teacher learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 116–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(3), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L. (2003). Accountability: Responsebility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2002). Professional community and the problem of high school reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). The Relationship between departments as professional communities and student achievement in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(4), 722–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chigaco Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, D. (1995). The power of their idea: Lessons from America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, D. (2002). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midthassel, U. V. (2006). Creating a shared understanding of classroom management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(3), 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midthassel, U. V., & Bru, E. (2001). Predictors and gains of teacher involvement in an improvement project on classroom management. Experiences from a Norwegian project in two compulsory schools. Educational Psychology, 21(3), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midthassel, U. V., & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2008). Schools Implementing Zero. The process of implementing an anti-bullying program in six Norwegian compulsory schools. Journal of Educational Change, 9, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munthe, E. (2003). Teachers’ workplace and professional certainty. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 19(8), 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. Sociological Methodology, 27, 453–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2007). Mplus User’s Guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nelson, T. H., Deuel, A., Slavit, D., & Kennedy, A. (2010). Leading Deep conversations in collaborative inquiry groups. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(5), 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: Center on Organizational and Restructuring of Schools, University of Winsconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. (2007). SPSS 15.0 guide to data analysis. Chicago, IL: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oterkiil, C., & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2012). Schools’ readiness and capacity to improve matter accepted for publication in education. Inquiry, 3(1), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, A. M. (2002). Teacher burnout: A psychodynamic existential perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace. New York: Columbia University, Teacher college.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sava, F. A. (2002). Causes and effects of teacher conflict-inducing attitudes towards pupils: A path analysis model. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 18(8), 1007–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, L., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2007). Teacher collaboration in the context of the responsive classroom approach. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 211–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. The Jossey-Bass higher education series

  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (2006). The fifth disipline—The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

  • Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teachers’ reports of their interactions with teacher leaders concerning classroom instruction. Elementary School Journal, 93(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, A. M. (2011). Professional development within collaborative teacher study groups: Pitfalls and promises. Arts Education Policy Review, 112(2), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuen, E., & Bru, E. (2009). Are changes in students’ perceptions of the learning environment related to changes in emotional and behavioural problems? School Psychology International, 30(2), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (2006). Authenticity in knowledge-productive learning: What drives knowledge construction in collaborative inquiry? Human Resource Development International, 9(2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchino, B., Cacipo, J., & Kiecolt-Glasser, K. (1996). The relationships between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2001). Stress and strain in teaching: A structural equation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, N. L., & McLeskey, J. (2010). Establishing a collaborative school culture through comprehensive school reform. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. R., Bullough, R. V, Jr, Draper, R. J., Smith, L. K., & Erickson, L. B. (2005). Novice teacher growth and personal models of mentoring: Choosing compassion over inquiry. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik, J. A. (1987). Teachers’ collegial interaction: An exploratory study. The Elementary School Journal, 87(4), 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigrun K. Ertesvåg.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Descriptive statistic for items constituting collaborative activity for the two different interventions groups
Table 4 School level mean (M), minimum score (Min) and maximum (Max) for schools got Items constituting collaborative activity for the two interventions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ertesvåg, S.K. Teachers’ collaborative activity in school-wide interventions. Soc Psychol Educ 17, 565–588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9262-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9262-x

Keywords

Navigation