Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting pre-service teachers’ opposition to inclusion of students with disabilities: a path analytic study

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addressed predictors of pre-service teachers’ opposition toward the practice of educating students with disabilities in mainstream classroom settings—a practice known as inclusion. We tested a hypothesized path model that incorporated social dominance orientation (SDO) and contact as distal predictors, and intergroup anxiety, stereotype use, and self-efficacy for including students with disabilities as more proximal predictors of opposition to inclusion in a sample of 229 pre-service teachers from the Southwestern United States. In large part, the predicted relationships among our variables were supported. The effect of SDO on opposition to inclusion was both indirect (via stereotype use and intergroup anxiety) and direct. The effect of close contact with persons with disabilities relevant to inclusion was mediated by intergroup anxiety and, more distally, by stereotype use. Stereotype use and intergroup anxiety were positive predictors of opposition to inclusion. The predicted relationship between self-efficacy and opposition to inclusion was not supported by the data. Rather, the data supported a reverse causal ordering. Implications for future research are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberson, C. L., & Haag, S. C. (2007). Contact, perspective taking, and anxiety as predictors of stereotype endorsement, explicit attitudes, and implicit attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asbrock, F., Nieuwoudt, C., Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Societal stereotypes and the legitimation of intergroup behavior in Germany and New Zealand. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 154–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2007). Structural model of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, G., Hart, J., & Jekogian, A. M. (2012). Belief in a just world and social dominance orientation: Evidence for a meditational pathway predicting negative attitudes and discrimination against individuals with mental illness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 428–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, J. A., & Crowson, H. M. (2009). Predicting dispositions toward inclusion of students with disabilities: The role of conservative ideology and discomfort with disability. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. School Psychology, 44, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A. J. (2010). Themes in the research on preservice teachers’ views on cultural diversity: Implications for researching millennial preservice teachers. Educational Researcher, 39, 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corenblum, B., & Stephan, W. G. (2001). White fears and native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 33, 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R., & Husnu, S. (2011). Attributional processes underlying imagined contact effects. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, H. M., & Brandes, J. A. (2010). Predicting community opposition to inclusion in schools: The role of social dominance, contact, intergroup anxiety, and economic conservatism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 144, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, H. M., & Brandes, J. A. (2013). Motives to respond without prejudice: Predictors of greater expressed inclusiveness toward students with disabilities by pre-service teachers? Individual Differences Research, 11, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, H. M., Brandes, J. A., & Hurst, R. (2013). Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities? Journal of Applied Social Psychology Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jasp.12046.

  • Curseu, P. L., Stoop, R., & Schalk, R. (2007). Prejudice toward immigrant workers among Dutch employees: Integrated threat theory revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. R., & Henkin, A. B. (2002). Assessing dispositions toward cultural diversity among preservice teachers. Urban Education, 37, 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on out-group attitudes and their mediation by threat from competitiveness to out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, R. (2011). Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1340–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, A., Tropp, L. R., & Fernández, S. (2011). When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, K. V., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in The Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., & Swart, H. (2011). Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 374–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed). New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Kteily, N., Ho, A. K., & Sidanius, J. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Big-five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytical test of the intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 152–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The ideological legitimization of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Political Psychology, 31, 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, L. E., & McCord, D. M. (2010). Personality traits and beliefs about diversity in pre-service teachers. Individual Differences Research, 8, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezzali, L., Capozza, D., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2012). Increasing outgroup trust, reducing infrahumanization, and enhancing future contact intentions via imagined intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodson-Williams, K. (2010). Do right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and perceived self-efficacy predict teachers’ prejudice against ESL students and intention to pursue ESL training? Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Oklahoma.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Oklahoma, 820 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK, 73019-2041, USA

    H. Michael Crowson & Joyce A. Brandes

Authors
  1. H. Michael Crowson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joyce A. Brandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Michael Crowson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crowson, H.M., Brandes, J.A. Predicting pre-service teachers’ opposition to inclusion of students with disabilities: a path analytic study. Soc Psychol Educ 17, 161–178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9238-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9238-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation