Do gender–science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors?
- 1.4k Downloads
The present research examined whether gender–science stereotypes were associated with science identification and, in turn, science career aspirations among women and men undergraduate science majors. More than 1,700 students enrolled in introductory science courses completed measures of gender–science stereotypes (implicit associations and endorsement of male superiority in science), science identification, and science career aspirations. Results were consistent with theoretically based predictions. Among women, stronger gender–science stereotypes were associated with weaker science identification and, in turn, weaker science career aspirations. By contrast, among men stronger gender–science stereotypes were associated with stronger science identification and, in turn, stronger science career aspirations, particularly among men who were highly gender identified. These two sets of modest but significant findings can accumulate over large populations and across critical time points within a leaky pipeline to meaningfully contribute to gender disparities in STEM domains.
KeywordsImplicit attitudes Gender Stereotypes Identity Science
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615–1628. doi: 10.1177/014616702237644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferriman, K., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 517–532. doi: 10.1037/a0016030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application. New York, NY: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper Row.Google Scholar
- Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x.
- McArdle, E. (2008). The freedom to say ‘no’. Retrieved from http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/05/18/the_freedom_to_say_no/?page=1.
- Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math \(=\) male, me \(=\) female, therefore math \(\ne \) me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. doi: 10.1037//0022-3518.104.22.168.
- Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.Google Scholar