Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender-, race-, and income-based stereotype threat: the effects of multiple stigmatized aspects of identity on math performance and working memory function

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared the relative impact of gender-, race-, and income-based stereotype threat and examined if individuals with multiple stigmatized aspects of identity experience a larger stereotype threat effect on math performance and working memory function than people with one stigmatized aspect of identity. Seventy-one college students of the stigmatized and privileged gender, race, and income-level completed math and working memory pre-tests. Then, participants heard a moderately explicit stereotype threat-inducing prime. Next, participants took math and working memory post-tests. Stereotype threat effects were found on math performance on the basis of race and income-level, but not on the basis of gender. Stereotype threat effects were found on working memory function on the basis of gender, race, and income-level. For both measures, the income-based effects were the strongest. Results also suggest the possibility of multiple minority stereotype threat effects on math performance and working memory. More specifically, individuals with three stigmatized aspects of identity experienced significantly larger stereotype threat effects than those with zero-, one-, or two-stigmatized aspects of identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway, T. P. (2007). Automated working memory assessment. London: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddedly, A. D., & Hitch, G. L. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bpwer (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Jellison, W. A., Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Carr, T. H. (2006). On the causal mechanism of stereotype threat: Can skills that don’t rely heavily on working memory still be threatened? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 1059–1071. doi:10.1177/0146167206288489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136(2), 256–276. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Guo, G., & Furstenberg, F. (1993). Who drops out of and who continues beyond high school? A 20-year follow-up of black urban youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3(3), 271–294. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0303_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. S., & Leaper, C. (2010). Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 860–870. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. P., & Day, E. A. (2006). The difference isn’t black and white: stereotype threat and the race gap on raven’s advanced progressive matrices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 979–984. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosker, R. J., Sniders, T. A. B., & Guldemond, H. (2003). PINT: Power analysis in two-level designs [software]. Available from http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/snijders.

  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes towards the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594. doi:10.1177/0146167298246003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, J. S., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C. E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotype to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 740–754. doi:10.1037/a0020971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 659–670. doi:10.1177/0146167202288010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresky, D. M., Eyck, L. L. T., Lord, C. G., & McIntrye, R. B. (2005). Effects of salient multiple identities on women’s performance under mathematics stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 53(9), 703–716. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7735-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. A., Stevens, C. M., Monty, A. N., & Coakley, C. A. (2006). The consequences of stereotype threat on the academic performance of White and non-White lower income college students. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 341–357. doi:10.1007/s11218-005-5456-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differneces in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educational Researcher, 14(3), 20–25. doi:10.2307/1174575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2007). Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 544–564. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotpye threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 137(4), 691–705. doi:10.1037/a0013834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women’s math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 193–198. doi:10.1023/A:1021003307511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 371–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202250218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 942–958. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, E., & Guo, G. (2001). Gender differences in mathematical trajectories. Social Forces, 80(2), 713–732. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E., Thorpe, E., Brooks-Gunn, J., Casserly, P., & McAloon, A. (1985). Understanding sex/ethnic related differences in mathematics, science and computer science for students in grades four to eight. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T. (2002). A closer look at Black-White mathematics gaps: Intersections of race and SES in NAEP achievement and instructional practices data. Journal of Negro Education, 71(4), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, L. A., Lev-Arey, D. M., & Zeigert, J. C. (2003). An Examination of stereotype threat in a motivational context. Human Performance, 16(3), 181–205. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1603_2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2006.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C. (1998). Gender differences in parental involvement and adolescents’ mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 71(4), 336–356. doi:10.2307/2673174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. H. D., O’Neal, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Relating test-taking attitudes and skills and stereotype threat effects to the racial gap in cognitive ability test performance. Human Performance, 16, 261–294. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1603_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat effect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. doi:10.1037/a0012702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palardy, G. J. (2008). Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: a multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1), 21–49. doi:10.1080/09243450801936845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R. E., Ziegert, J. C., & McFarland, L. A. (2003). Understanding racial differences on cognitive ability tests in selection contexts: An integration of stereotype threat and applicant reactions research. Human Performance, 16(3), 231–259. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1603_4.

  • Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quayle, M. (2011). Situated identity performance: Understanding stereotype threat as a social identity phenomenon. Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

  • Raudenbush, S. W. et al. (2011). Optimal design software for multi-level and longitudinal research (version 3.01) [software]. Available from www.wtgrantfoundation.org.

  • Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Crisp, R. J. (2006). Reducing stereotype threat by blurring intergroup boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501–511. doi:10.1177/0146167205281009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, R. J., Beilock, S. L., & McConell, A. R. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949–966. doi:10.1037/a0014846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, R. J., & Boucher, K. L. (2010). Capitalizing on multiple social identities to prevent stereotype threat: The moderating role of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 239–250. doi:10.1177/0146167209355062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Hardison, C. M., & Cullen, M. J. (2004). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests. American Psychologist, 59, 7–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, T. P, Jr, & Hollis-Sawyer, L. A. (2005). Predicting stereotype threat, test anxiety, and cognitive ability test performance: An examination of three models. International Journal of Testing, 5, 225–246. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201. doi:10.1023/A:1018854212358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Jones, D., & Clark, M. L. (1986). The school experience of black girls: The interaction of gender, race, and socioeconomic status. The Phi Delta Kappan, 67(7), 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psyhological Science, 10(1), 80–83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B., & Castano, E. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! Stereotype threat among low socioeconomic status individuals. Social Justice Research, 20, 418–432. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. I. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of meditational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 177–206. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034020.20317.89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46–50. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 93–102. doi:10.1037/a0026617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, L. J., & Ward, W. C. (2004). Stereotype threat, inquiring about test takers’ ethnicity and gender, and standardized test performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 665–693. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02564.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences. (2009). Percentage of students at or above selected mathematics proficiency levels, by age, sex, and race/ethnicity: Selected years, 1978 through 2008 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_141.asp.

  • United States Census (2010). Quickfacts. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/.

  • Walsh, M., Hickey, C., & Duffy, J. (1999). Influence of item content and stereotype situation on gender differences in mathematical problem solving. Sex Roles, 41, 219–240. doi:10.1023/A:1018854212358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wax, A. L. (2009). Stereotype threat: A case of overclaim syndrome? University of Pennsylvania Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 08–14.

  • Wicherts, J. M. (2005). Stereotype threat research and the assumptions underlying analysis of covariance. American Psychologist, 60(3), 267–269. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. C. (1997). Gender and Fair Assessment. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2003). Dimensions of socioeconomic status and their relationship to mathematics and science achievement at individual and collective levels. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 21–41. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01184.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Kaminsky Family Fund award and the Paul K. Richter and Evalyn E. Cook Richter Memorial Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Dartmouth College, 6103 Raven House, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA

    Michele Tine & Rebecca Gotlieb

Authors
  1. Michele Tine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca Gotlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Tine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tine, M., Gotlieb, R. Gender-, race-, and income-based stereotype threat: the effects of multiple stigmatized aspects of identity on math performance and working memory function. Soc Psychol Educ 16, 353–376 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9224-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9224-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation