Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 471–493 | Cite as

The impact of engineering identification and stereotypes on undergraduate women’s achievement and persistence in engineering

  • Brett D. Jones
  • Chloe Ruff
  • Marie C. Paretti
Article

Abstract

Women almost always comprise a minority in engineering programs and a smaller percentage of women pursue engineering than other science and technology majors. The culture of engineering departments and negative stereotypes of women’s engineering and mathematical ability have been identified as factors that inhibit women’s entry into engineering and cause them to leave the major. Even for women who stay, stereotype threat or the anxiety of confirming a negative stereotype can decrease academic performance. To more fully understand this dynamic, we examined four factors associated with stereotype threat (engineering identification, gender identification, gender stereotype endorsement, and engineering ability perceptions) to determine how they impacted women’s achievement and persistence in engineering at the end of their first year of an engineering program. Participants included 363 first-year general engineering students from a large public university. Students completed a questionnaire near the end of their first year. Results indicated that there were differences between men and women for gender stereotype endorsement and engineering ability perceptions, with men more likely to hold negative stereotypes of women’s engineering abilities and women more likely to report higher perceptions of their engineering abilities. Engineering identification was a significant predictor of persistence in engineering, and engineering ability perceptions were significant predictors of achievement; the relationships were stronger for women than men. The fact that neither gender identification nor gender stereotype endorsement were related to achievement or persistence in engineering indicated that they were less important factors for first-year women engineering students than engineering identification and engineering ability perceptions.

Keywords

Identification Stereotype threat Gender identity  Ability perceptions Retention Achievement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the Office of Educational Research and Outreach in the School of Education at Virginia Tech for providing funding to conduct this study. This paper is also based on research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. HRD# 0936704. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 29–46. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on african american college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 436–456). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education. doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3.
  6. Bell, A. E., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E., & Logel, C. E. R. (2003). Stereotype threat and women’s performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., & Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and ethnicity differences in freshmen engineering student attitudes: A cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Concannon, J. P., & Barrow, L. H. (2010). Men’s and women’s intentions to persist in undergraduate engineering degree programs. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 19(2), 133–145. doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9187-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  11. Crisp, R. J., Bache, L. M., & Maitner, A. T. (2009). Dynamics of social comparison in counter-stereotypic domains: Stereotype boost, not stereotype threat, for women engineering majors. Social Influence, 4(3), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594. doi: 10.1177/0146167298246003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dryburgh, H. (1999). Work hard, play hard. Gender & Society, 13(5), 664–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  15. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. doi: 10.1177/0146167295213003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot, D. S., & Voss, H. L. (1974). Delinquency and dropout. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  17. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step. New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  18. Gold, M., & Mann, D. W. (1984). Expelled to a friendlier place: A study of effective alternative schools. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  19. Harrison, L. M., Stevens, C. M., Monty, A. N., & Coakley, C. M. (2006). The consequences of stereotype threat on the academic performance of White and non-White lower income college students. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 341–357. doi: 10.1007/s11218-005-5456-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, B. D. (2009). Motivating students to engage in learning: The MUSIC model of academic motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 272–285.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, B. D., Osborne, J. W., Paretti, M. C., & Matusovich, H. M. (2012, April). Relationships among students’ perceptions of a first-year engineering design course and their identification with engineering, motivational beliefs, course effort, and academic outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, B. D., Paretti, M. C., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W. (2010). An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, J. (2007). Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students’ maths performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 323–338. doi: 10.1348/000709906X113662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kellow, J. T., & Jones, B. D. (2005). Stereotype threat in African-American high school students: An initial investigation. Current Issues in Education, 8(20). Retrieved October 15, 2012, from http://cie.asu.edu/volume8/number20.
  26. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes. Psychological Science, 18(1), 13–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01841.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lesko, A. C., & Corpus, J. H. (2006). Discounting the difficult: How high math-identified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54, 113–125. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2010). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsui, T., & Tsukamoto, S.-I. (1991). Relation between career self-efficacy measures based on occupational titles and Holland codes and model environments: A methodological contribution. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38(1), 78–91. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(91)90019-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 261–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  33. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/start.htm.
  34. Osborne, J. W. (1997). Identification with academics and academic success among community college students. Community College Review, 25(1), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osborne, J. W., & Jones, B. D. (2011). Identification with academics and motivation to achieve in school: How the structure of the self influences academic outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 131–158. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9151-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborne, J. W., & Rausch, J. L. (2001). Identification with academics and academic outcomes in secondary students. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  37. Osborne, J. W., & Walker, C. (2006). Stereotype threat, identification with academics, and withdrawal from school: Why the most successful students of colour might be most likely to withdraw. Educational Psychology, 26(4), 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pieronek, C., McWilliams, L. H., & Silliman, S. E. (2003). Initial observations on student retention and course satisfaction based on first-year engineering student surveys and interviews. In Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition.Google Scholar
  39. Reid, K. C. (1981). Alienation and persistent school absenteeism. Research in Education, 26, 31–40.Google Scholar
  40. Schmader, T. (2001). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experiemntal Social Psychology, 38(2), 194–201. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender Identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R. H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 93–111. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, C. S., & Hung, L. (2008). Stereotype threat: Effects on education. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stone, J. (2002). Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1667–1678. doi: 10.1177/014616702237648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  51. Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilkins, J. L. M. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolfe, J., & Powell, E. (2009). Biases in interpersonal communication: How engineering students perceive gender typical speech acts in teamwork. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zastavker, Y. V., Ong, M., & Page, L. (2006). Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program. Presented at the frontiers in education conference, 36th annual, IEEE. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322485.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brett D. Jones
    • 1
  • Chloe Ruff
    • 2
  • Marie C. Paretti
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Learning Sciences and Technologies, School of Education (0313)Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Office of First Year Experiences (0914)Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.Department of Engineering Education (0218)Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations