Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 361–375 | Cite as

Examining the effects of stereotype threat on test-taking behaviors

  • Charles A. ScherbaumEmail author
  • Victoria Blanshetyn
  • Elizabeth Marshall-Wolp
  • Elizabeth McCue
  • Ross Strauss
Article

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between stereotype threat and individual test-taking behaviors. Previous research has examined the impact of stereotype threat on test scores, but little research has examined the impact of stereotype threat on the test-taking behaviors impacting those scores. Using a pre-post experimental design, stereotype threat was manipulated and test-taking behaviors (e.g., time spent per item, response changes) were measured while completing verbal ability items before and after the manipulation. The results indicated that stereotype threat minimally impacted time-related test-taking behaviors, but did impact behaviors related to response changes. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Stereotype threat Test-taking behaviors Race differences Ability testing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson J., Fried C., Good C. (2002) Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38: 29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson J., Lustina M. J., Good C., Keough K., Steele C. M., Brown J. (1999) Whenwhite men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin L. T., Cavell T. A., Shallenberger W. R. (1984) Staying with initial answers onobjective tests: Is it a myth. Teaching of Psychology 11: 133–141Google Scholar
  4. Bridgeman B., Trapani C., Curley E. (2004) Impact of fewer questions per section on SAT I scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 41: 291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown R. P., Pinel E. C. (2003) Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39: 626–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns K. C., Isbell L. M. (2007) Promoting malleability is not one size fits all: Primingimplicit theories of intelligence as a function of self-theories. Self & Identity 6: 51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croizet J., Claire T. (1998) Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Milia L. (2007) Benefiting from multiple-choice exams: The positive impact of answerswitching. Educational Psychology 27: 607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis A.P.J., Ryan A.M. (2003) Race and cognitive-ability test performance: The mediating effects of test preparation, test-taking strategy use, and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33: 2607–2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eysenck M. W., Derakshan N., Santos R., Calvo M. G. (2007) Anxiety and cognitiveperformance: Attentional control theory. Emotions 7: 336–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geen R. G. (1985) Test anxiety and visual vigilance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 963–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geiger M. A. (1991) Changing multiple-choice answers: Do students accurately perceive theirperformance?. Journal of Experimental Education 59: 250–257Google Scholar
  13. Heubert, J. P., Hauser, R. M. (eds) (1999) High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, andgraduation. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Hough L. M., Oswald F. L., Ployhart R. E. (2001) Determinants, detection and ameliorationadverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence, and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9: 152–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller J. (2007) Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domainidentification task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students’ math performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kruger J., Wirtz D., Miller D. T. (2005) Counterfactual thinking and the first instinctfallacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mandinach, E. B., Bridgeman, B., Cahalan-Laitusis, C., & Trapani, C. (2005). The impact ofextended time on SAT test performance (ETS Research Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.Google Scholar
  18. Maner J. K., Richey J. A., Cromer K., Mallott M., Lejuez C. W., Joiner T. E., Schmidt N. B. (2007) Dispositional anxiety and risk-avoidant decision-making. Personality andIndividual Differences 42: 666–675Google Scholar
  19. McNulty J., Sonntag B., Sinacore J. (2007) Test-taking behaviors on a multiple-choiceexam are associated with performance on the exam and with learning style. Journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators 17: 52–57Google Scholar
  20. Mueller D., Wasser V. (1977) Implications of changing answers on objective test items. Journal of Educational Measurement 14: 9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen H. D., O’Neal A., Ryan A. M. (2003) Relating test-taking attitudes and skillsand stereotype threat effects to the racial gap in cognitive ability test performance. Human Performance 16: 261–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nguyen H. D., Ryan A. M. (2008) Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minoritiesand women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 1314–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oates G. (2009) An empirical test of five prominent explanations for the black-white academicperformance gap. Social Psychology of Education 12: 415–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roth P. L., Bevier C. A., Bobko P., Switzer F. S. I., Tyler P. (2001) Ethnic groupdifferences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 54: 297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sackett P. R. (2003) Stereotype threat in applied selection settings: A commentary. Human Performance 16: 295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sackett P. R., Hardison C. M., Cullen M. J. (2004) On interpreting stereotype threat asaccounting for African–American–White differences on cognitive tests. American Psychologist 59: 7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sackett P. R., Schmitt N., Ellingson J. E., Kabin M. B. (2001) High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. American Psychologist 56: 302–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith C., Hung L. (2008) Stereotype threat: Effects on education. Social Psychology of Education 11: 243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., Quinn D. M. (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s mathperformance. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 35: 29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steele C. M. (1997) A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity andperformance. American Psychologist 52: 613–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steele C. M., Aronson J. (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 797–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steele C. M., Davies P. G. (2003) Stereotype threat and employment testing: A commentary. Human Performance 16: 311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whaley A. L. (1998) Issues of validity in empirical tests of stereotype threat theory. American Psychologist 53: 679–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wild C., Durso R., Rubin D. (1982) Effect of increased test-taking time on test scores byethnic group, years out of school, and sex. Journal of Educational Measurement 19: 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles A. Scherbaum
    • 1
    Email author
  • Victoria Blanshetyn
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Marshall-Wolp
    • 1
  • Elizabeth McCue
    • 1
  • Ross Strauss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Baruch CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations