Effect of syllabus tone: students’ perceptions of instructor and course

Abstract

It is not uncommon for students to complain that faculty are unapproachable, while faculty complain that students are not engaged. Such perceptions, especially when formed at the start of a semester, can impact what students learn and how instructors teach; therefore, it is critical that these perceptions are prevented if a course is to be successful. A good starting point is the syllabus, which not only informs students about a course and its requirements, but creates a first impression about the instructor and his or her attitudes toward teaching. We conducted an experiment in which the course syllabus was manipulated to reflect a friendly or an unfriendly tone so that we could explore the perceptions students formed of the instructor and class. Results supported the hypothesis that a syllabus written in a friendly, rather than unfriendly, tone evoked perceptions of the instructor being more warm, more approachable, and more motivated to teach the course.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., Tannenbaum, P. H. (eds) (1968) Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambady N., Rosenthal R. (1992) Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 111: 256–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambady N., Rosenthal R. (1993) Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asch S. E. (1946) Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41: 258–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Babad E., Avni-Babad D., Rosenthal R. (2004) Prediction of students; evaluations from brief instances of professors’ nonverbal behavior in defined instructional situations. Social Psychology of Education 7: 3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Babad E., Kaplowitz H., Darley J. (1999) A “classic” revisited: Students’ immediate and delayed evaluations of a warm/cold instructor. Social Psychology of Education 3: 81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basow S. (1995) Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 87: 656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basow S. (2000) Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students’ choices. Sex Roles 43: 407–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Best J. B., Addison W. E. (2000) A preliminary study of perceived warmth of professor and student evaluations. Teaching of Psychology 27: 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buchert S., Laws E. L., Apperson J. M., Bregman N. J. (2008) First impressions and professor reputation: Influence on student evaluations of instruction. Social Psychology of Education 11: 397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carnes L. W., Awang F., Marlow J. (2003) Can instructors ensure the integrity and quality of online courses?. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 43(3): 162–172

    Google Scholar 

  12. Centra J. A., Gaubatz N. B. (2000) Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching?. The Journal of Higher Education 70: 17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T., Glick P. (2004) When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues 60: 701–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuddy A. J. C., Norton M., Fiske S. T. (2005) This old stereotype: The stubbornness and pervasiveness of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues 61: 267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DiClementi J. D., Handelsman M. M. (2005) Empowering students: Class-generated course rules. Teaching of Psychology 32: 18–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman K. A. (1993) College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II—evidence from students’ evaluation of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34: 151–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frymier A. B. (1994) The use of affinity-seeking in producing liking and learning in the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research 22: 87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffin B. W. (2001) Instructor reputation and student ratings of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 26: 534–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grunert J. (1997) The course syllabus: A learning centered approach. Anker Publishing Company Inc, Bolton, MA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gurung R. E. R., Vespia K. M. (2007) Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology 34: 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harnish, R. J., O’Brien McElwee, R., Slattery, J. M., Frantz, S., Haney, M. R., Shore, C. M., & Penley, J. (2011). Creating the foundation for a warm classroom climate: Best practices in syllabus tone. APS Observer, 24, 23–27.

  22. Judd C. M., James-Hawkins L., Yzerbyt V. T., Kashima Y. (2005) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89: 899–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelley H. H. (1950) The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons. Journal of Personality 18: 431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kervyn N., Yzerbyt V. Y., Judd C. M., Nunes A. (2009) A question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 828–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kilbourne, J. (2003). Deadly persuasion: The advertising of alcohol and tobacco [DVD]. Available from Media Education Foundation.

  26. McClleland J. N. (1970) The effect of student evaluations of college instruction upon subsequent evaluations. California Journal of Educational Research 21: 88–95

    Google Scholar 

  27. McKeachie W. J. (1986) Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher (8th ed.). D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Murray H. G., Rushton J. P., Paunonen S. V. (1990) Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–2007. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009044

  30. Nisbett R. E., Wilson T. D. (1977) The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ory J. C. (2001) Faculty thoughts and concerns about student ratings. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 87: 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenberg S., Sidlak A. (1972) Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In: Berkowitz L. (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 235–297

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rubin, S. (1985). Professors, students, and the syllabus. The Chronicle of Higher Education 56.

  34. Suddreth A., Galloway A. T. (2006) Options for planning a course and developing a syllabus. In: Buskist W., Davis S. F. (eds) Handbook of the teaching of psychology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, pp 31–35

    Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor S. E., Fiske S. T. (1978) Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In: Berkowitz L. (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 249–288

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thorndike E. L. (1920) A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 4: 25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Waters M., Kemp E., Pucci A. (1988) High and low faculty evaluations: Descriptions by students. Teaching of Psychology 15: 203–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Widmeyer W. N., Loy J. W. (1988) When you’re hot, you’re hot! Warm-cold effects in first impressions of persons and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 118–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Harnish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harnish, R.J., Bridges, K.R. Effect of syllabus tone: students’ perceptions of instructor and course. Soc Psychol Educ 14, 319–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9152-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Syllabus
  • Tone
  • Classroom climate
  • Person perception