Skip to main content

Schools as promoters of moral judgment: the essential role of teachers’ encouragement of critical thinking

Abstract

The assumption that high level functioning is characterized by a great deal of autonomy is central to some major theories of moral development [Kohlberg (in T. Lickona (ed.) Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues, 1976); Piaget (The moral judgment of the child, 1932)] and to the self-determination theory of motivation [Ryan and Deci (The American Psychologist, 55, 68–78, 2000)]. Based on these theories, we hypothesized that students’ perceptions of their teachers as autonomy supportive, mainly in the form of encouragement of critical thinking, and perhaps also choice, would be positively associated with students’ advanced moral judgment. Data collected from 12th grade students in two regular schools and two democratic schools supported this hypothesis. Results also showed that being a student in a democratic school (as opposed to a regular one) was associated with autonomous moral judgment, and that this association was mediated by students’ perceptions of teachers as encouraging criticism, but not choice. A possible implication is that programs of moral education should explicitly promote teachers’ inclination to encourage critical thinking in their students.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Alfi O., Assor A., Katz I. (2004) Learning to allow temporary failure: Potential benefits, supportive practices and teacher concerns. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 30: 27–41. doi:10.1080/0260747032000162299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A. (1999) Value accessibility and teachers’ ability to encourage independent and critical thought in students. Social Psychology of Education 2: 315–338. doi:10.1023/A:1009664825449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Cohen-Melayev M., Kaplan A., Friedman D. (2005) Choosing to stay religious in a modern world: Socialization and exploration processes leading to an integrated internalization of religion among Israeli Jewish youth. In: Maehr M.L., Karabenick S. (eds) Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol 14 Religion and motivation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 105–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Kaplan H. (2001) Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine students experience of autonomy in learning. In: Efklides A., Kuhl J., Sorrentino R. (eds) Trends and prospects in motivation research. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. (2002) Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 261–278. doi:10.1348/000709902158883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A., Roth G., Deci E.L. (2004) The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality 72: 47–88. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00256.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N., Miller P.A., Shell R., McNalley S., Shea C. (1991) Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 27: 849–857. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné M. (2003) The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in the engagement of prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion 27: 199–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick W.S., Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. (1997) Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In: Grusec J.E., Kuczynski L. (eds) Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory. Wiley, New York, pp 135–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph P.B., Efron S. (2005) Seven worlds of moral education. Phi Delta Kappan 86: 525–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G.(2003). Is autonomy important for all students? Evidence from a longitudinal study of children with different levels of parental education. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Katz I., Assor A. (2007) When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review 19: 429–442. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1976) Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In: Lickona T. (eds) Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp 31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn D. (2005) Education for thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Furgy W.G., Woloshin G.W. (1969) Immediate and long-term effects of experimentally induced social influence in the modification of adolescents’ moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12: 104–110. doi:10.1037/h0027563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind G., Wakenhut R. (1985) Testing for moral judgment competence. In: Lind G., Hartmann H.A., Wakenhut R. (eds) Moral development and the social environment. Studies in the philosophy and psychology of moral judgment and education. Precedent Publishing Inc, Chicago, pp 79–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman M. (2003) Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman M., Sharp A.M., Oscanyan F.S. (1980) Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissim, R. S. (1980). The development of helping behavior and moral judgment in adolescence. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University.

  • Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36: 717–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J. (1932) The moral judgment of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J., Bolt E., Cai Y. (1999) Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 537–458. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. (1979) Development in judging moral issues. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R.M., Connell J.P. (1989) Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist 55: 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor I. (1992) Empowering education. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste M., Simons J., Lens W., Soenens B., Matos L. (2005) Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development 76: 483–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (2000). Reconstructing Larry: Assessing the legacy of Lawrence Kohlberg. HGSE News. Retrieved February 15, 2008 from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/larry10012000_page1.html.

  • Ziv A., Green D., Guttman J. (1978) Moral judgment: Differences between city, kibbutz, and Israeli Arab preadolescents on the realistic-relativistic dimension. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9: 215–226. doi:10.1177/002202217892008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv A., Shani A., (1975) Differences in moral judgment of the adolescents educated in Israel and in the Soviet Union. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 6: 108–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Weinstock.

Additional information

The article is based on research by the third author for her MA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of her degree requirements at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the American Educational Researchers Association Annual Meeting (April 2006), San Francisco, CA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinstock, M., Assor, A. & Broide, G. Schools as promoters of moral judgment: the essential role of teachers’ encouragement of critical thinking. Soc Psychol Educ 12, 137–151 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9068-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9068-9

Keywords

  • Autonomy support
  • Self-determination theory
  • Adolescence
  • Moral autonomy
  • Critical thinking
  • Democratic schools