Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 119–138 | Cite as

Honesty doesn’t Always Pay – The Role of Honesty of Accounts for Success made in an Educational Setting in Inferences of Modesty and Arrogance

  • Shlomo HareliEmail author
  • Bernard Weiner
  • Jennifer Yee
Article

Abstract

Previous research has documented that attributional information contained in causal accounts for success induce impressions of arrogance and modesty. The research further examined the role of accounts as well as level of success when perceivers know the real reason for success. Two studies of university students revealed that honesty strongly decreases arrogance and increases modesty in the case of effort accounts, and not in situations of communicated ability. In addition, honesty was determined not only by the truth value of an account but also by the extent to which the account induced impressions of arrogance and modesty. The present findings provide further understanding of the link between attributional information and social judgments.

Keywords

Impression Management Achievement Motivation Social Emotion Social Judgment Real Reason 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Ze’ev, A. 1993On the virtue of modestyAmerican Philosophical Quarterly30235246Google Scholar
  2. Carlston, D.E., Shovar, N. 1983Effects of performance attributions on others’ perceptions of the attributorJournal of Personality & Social Psychology44515525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feather, N.T. 1994Attitudes towards high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppiesZanna, M. eds. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26)Academic PressSan Diego173Google Scholar
  4. Hareli, S., Weiner, B. 2000Accounts for success as determinants of perceived arrogance and modestyMotivation and Emotion17215236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hareli, S. (2006). The role of causal attribution in hurt feelings and related social emotions elicited in reaction to other’s feedback explaining an achiever’s failure, Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  6. Hareli, S., Weiner, B. 2002Social emotions and personality inferences: A scaffold for a new research direction in the study of achievement motivationEducational Psychologist37183193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levine, R.V., West, L.J. 1976Attraction as a function of boasting, self-apology, and credibility as an actorPsychological Reports3812431246Google Scholar
  8. Parkinson, B. 1999Relations and dissociations between appraisal and emotion reports in reasonable and unreasonable anger and guiltCognition and Emotion13347385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Robinson, M.D., Johnson, J.T., Shields, S.A. 1995On the advantages of modesty: The benefits of a balanced self-presentationCommunication Research22575591Google Scholar
  10. Reeder, G.D., Spores, J.M. 1983The attribution of moralityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology44736745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robinson, M.D., Clore, G.L. 2002Belief and feeling: An accessibility model of emotional self-reportPsychological Bulletin128934960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schlenker, B.R. 1975Self-presentation: Managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancementJournal of Personality and Social Psychology3210301037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlenker, B.R., Leary, M.R. 1982Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentationsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology1889104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stebbins, R.A. 1976Conceited talk: a test of hypothesisPsychological Reports3911111116Google Scholar
  15. Vonk, R. 1999Impression formation and impression management: Motives, traits, and likeability inferred from self-promoting and self-deprecating behaviorSocial Cognition17390412Google Scholar
  16. Wosinska, W., Dabul, A.J., Whetstone-Dion, R., Cialdini, R.B. 1996Self-presentational responses to success in the organization: The costs and benefits of modestyBasic & Applied Social Psychology18229242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Management and Department of Human ServicesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations