Skip to main content
Log in

Four Questions About Future Research on Protreptic and Education

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. On my reading of his argument, however, this statement goes to far. Marshall is often interested in how characters respond to Socrates and those responses open the door to Marshall’s suggestions about how Socratic protreptic could be more effective.

  2. The third and fourth chapters—which account for about half of the book—might have been best placed as an appendix. Those chapters provide an engaging and insightful overview of some key questions in Plato scholarship (like the assumptions that ground different approaches to Plato scholarship, the practicability of the kallipolis in Republic, and the value of the study of the history of philosophy generally). However, they somewhat awkwardly interrupt the three chapters devoted specifically to Marshall’s main concern, developing a theory of protreptic based on Plato’s dialogues.

References

  • Collins II, J.H., 2015. Exhortations to philosophy: The protreptics of Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle. Oxford University Press.

  • Dypedokk Johnsen, H. 2019. Socrates’ erotic educational methods. Journal of Philosophy of Education 53 (2): 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, D.S., and Monte R. Johnson. 2005. Authenticating aristotle’s protrepticus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 193–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato 1997. Plato: complete works. Cooper, John M., and Douglas S. Hutchinson, eds. Hackett Publishing.

  • Roochnik, David. 2001. Socrates’ pedagogical flexibility: Two case studies. Teaching Philosophy 24 (1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G.A., 2000. Plato's Socrates as educator. Suny Press.

  • Xenophon. 2018.Memorabilia. Trans. Amy L Bonnette. Cornell University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avi I. Mintz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mintz, A.I. Four Questions About Future Research on Protreptic and Education. Stud Philos Educ 41, 707–710 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09849-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09849-1

Navigation