Metamodernism, which is used synonymous with post-postmodernism or neo-modernism, has come forward in response to postmodernism and the emerged crises, instabilities, and uncertainties in all areas of this epoch. Metamodernism is a perspective situated epistemologically with (post)modernism, ontologically between (post)modernism and historically beyond (post)modernism. It seeks an oscillation between modernism and postmodernism with mediating between them and responding to existing cultural modes. Thus, metamodernism is a paradigm beyond modernism and postmodernism, trying to explain today’s cultural and intellectual developments which are not sufficiently criticized by modernism nor postmodernism. This paper questions and discusses the understanding of this paradigm and its reflections on education, school leadership, and schooling in the Nordic countries. By reviewing education related reports, survey reports, books and articles about these countries, comprehending their philosophy of education throughout the years, and analyzing the ongoing educational developments, the main notion of metamodernism and its influences on schooling, leadership implications, classroom activities and research in education are focused on this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anderson, R.E., and S. Dexter. 2005. School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly 41(1): 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269517.
Anderson, V.N., and I. Helgøy. 2007. Education reforms in Denmark and Norway: Restricting or enhancing the role of the state and the professions in education governance. Workshop 11, Reforming education policy: Internalisation-privatisation- governance, Helsinki Joint Session, 7–12 May. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/899c7405-7755-4fd9-a787-dcef691e84a5.pdf.
Andreasson, U., and M. Lundqvist. 2018. Nordic leadership. Denmark: Rosendahls.
Antikainen, A. 2006. In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50(3): 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743258.
Avolio, B.J., and W.L. Gardner. 2005. Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 16(3): 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001.
Beck, U. 2000. What is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Becker, A., M. Cummins, A. Freeman, and K. Rose. 2017. 2017 NMC technology outlook for Nordic Schools: A horizon project regional report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Begley, P.T. 2010. In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education 4(4): 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120110078043.
Beldarrain, Y. 2007. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education 27(2): 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789498.
Bentley, N. 2018. Trailing postmodernism: David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas, Zadie Smith’s NW, and the metamodern. English Studies 99(7): 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2018.1510611.
Bilimoria, D. 1995. Modernism, postmodernism, and contemporary grading practices. Journal of Management Education 19(4): 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299501900403.
Bishop, J., and M. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference. Atlanta, GA: ASEE.
Blossing, U., G. Imsen, and L. Moos. 2014. The Nordic education model: ‘A School for All’ encounters neo-liberal policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bolman, L.G., and T.E. Deal. 2000. People and organisation. In The Jossey–Bass reader on: Educational leadership, ed. M. Fullan, 59–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bottia, M.C., E. Stearns, R.A. Mickelson, S. Moller, and A.D. Parker. 2015. The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences and students’ intent to declare and declaration of a STEM majör in college. Teachers College Record 117(3): 1–46.
Bourriaud, N. 2009. Altermodern: Tate Triennial 2009. London: Tate Publishing.
Bower, M., C. Howe, N. McCredie, A. Robinson, and D. Grover. 2014. Augmented reality in education—Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International 51(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400.
Brunton, J. 2018. Whose (meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, race, and the politics of failure. Journal of Modern Literature 41(3): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05.
Bush, T. 2018. Distributed leadership and bureaucracy: Changing fashions in educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47(1): 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218806704.
Bybee, R.W. 2010. Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher 70(1): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.523220.
Coessens, K., and J.P. Van Bendegem. 2007. On the position of the educationalist intellectual in the information age: Shouldn’t we become meta-modern artists? In Educational research: Networks and technologies, ed. P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe, 71–84. Dordrecht: Springer.
Comaroff, J. 2011. The end of neoliberalism?: What is left of the left. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 637(1): 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211406846.
Constas, M.A. 1998. The changing nature of educational research and a critique of postmodernism. Educational Researcher 27(2): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176195.
Davies, P.M. 2010. On school educational technology leadership. Management in Education 24(2): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020610363089.
Digital Economy and Society Index [DESI]. 2019. The Digital Economy and Society Index 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi.
Dovemark, M., S. Kosunen, J. Kauko, B. Magnúsdóttir, P. Hansen, and P. Rasmussen. 2018. Deregulation, privitisation and marketisation of Nordic comprehensive education: Social changes reflected in schooling. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1429768.
Dumitrescu, A. 2014. Towards a metamodern literature (Doctoral dissertation). https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/4925/DumitrescuAlexandra2014PhD.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y.
Eguchi, A. 2014. Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, Padova (Italy), 18 July. Retrieved from https://www.robolab.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/00_WFr1_04.pdf.
Elstad, E. 2016. Educational technology in schools: Policymaking and policy enactment. In Digital expectations and experiences in education, ed. E. Elstad, 47–58. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Esping-Andersen, G. 1996. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. 2005. Education and equal life-chances: Investing in children. In Social policy and economic development in the Nordic countries, ed. O. Kangas and J. Palme, 147–163. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Field Waite, S., and K. Robbins. 2017. The question of creativity for the field of educational leadership. In The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership, ed. D. Waite and I. Bogotch, 29–44. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon, trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshal, J. Mepham & K: Sober. New York: Pantheon.
Fransson, G., J. Holmberg, O.J. Lindberg, and A.D. Olofsson. 2018. Digitalise and capitalise? Teachers’ self-understanding in 21st-century teaching contexts. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1500357.
Fuchs, J.A. 2017. “It takes a village”—(Catholic) education in the 21st century. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 241–254. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Giroux, H.A. 1983. Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H.A. 1988. Border pedagogy in the age of postmodernism. Journal of Education 170(3): 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748817000310.
Gronn, P. 2008. The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration 46(2): 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235.
Gronn, P. 2011. Hybrid configurations of leadership. In The SAGE handbook of leadership, ed. A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, and M. Uhl-Bien, 437–454. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Goldin, C., and L.F. Katz. 2008. The race between education and technology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gordon, T., and E. Lahelma. 1996. “School is like an Ants’ Nest”: Spatiality and embodiment in school. Gender and Education 8(3): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259621548.
Gustafsson, J., and S. Blömeke. 2018. Development of school achievement in the Nordic countries during half a century. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62(3): 386–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1434829.
Harris, A. 2009. Creative leadership: Developing future leaders. Management in Education 23(1): 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020608099076.
Hannah, S.T., R.L. Woolfolk, and R.G. Lord. 2009. Leader self-structure: A framework for positive leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30(2): 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.586.
Helliwell, J.F., H. Huang, and S. Wang. 2019. Changing world happiness. In World Happiness Report 2019, Chp 2, ed. J.F. Helliwell, R. Layard, and J.D. Sachs, 11–46. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Himanen, P. 2005. The Nordic model of the information society: The Finnish case. In Social policy and economic development in the Nordic countries, ed. O. Kangas and J. Palme, 265–280. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hultén, M., and B. Larsson. 2016. The flipped classroom: Primary and secondary teachers’ views on an educational movement in schools in Sweden today. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258662.
Hutcheon, L. 2002. The politics of postmodernism, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Imsen, G., U. Blossing, and L. Moos. 2017. Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency Changes in the comprehensive school Project in Denmark since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61(5): 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172502.
Inglehart, R. 2018. Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kara, H. 2015. Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Kim, C., D. Kim, J. Yuan, R.B. Hill, P. Doshi, and C.N. Thai. 2015. Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education 91: 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005.
Kirby, A. 2009. Digimodernism: How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. New York, London: Continuum.
Knox, J. 2016. Posthumanism and the MOOC: Opening the subject of digital education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35: 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9516-5.
Kontio, K., E. Pikkarainen, and P. Siljander. 2017. A modern idea of the school. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 1–18. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lathan, M. 2015. A poetics of postmodernism and neomodernism: Rewriting Mrs Dalloway. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, K. 2012. Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends 56(2): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3.
Leffel, G. 2017. The missiology of trouble: Liberal discontent and metamodern hope. Missiology: An International Review 45(1): 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829616676193.
Lipovetsky, G. 2005. Hypermodern times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lundahl, L. 2016. Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative & International Education 11(1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631059.
Mannay, D. 2016. Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Applications, reflection and ethics. New York: Routledge.
Maxcy, S.J. 1994. Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Møller, J. (2018). Scandinavian approaches to school leadership. In Invited Presentation at the International Conference Improving School Leadership, Copenhagen, 14–15 April. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/40553301.pdf.
Mortimore, P. 2013. Peter Mortimore: Nordic leadership: Something worth keeping. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Forewords, pp. vi–viii). Dordrecht: Springer.
Moore, M.G., and G. Kearsley. 2012. Distance education: A systems view of online learning, 3rd ed. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Moos, L., B. Hansen, G. Björk, and O. Johansson. 2013a. Leadership for democracy. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Chp 8, ed. L. Moos, 113–132. Dordrecht: Springer.
Moos, L., O. Johanson, and G. Skedsmo. 2013b. Successful Nordic school leadership. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Chp 10), ed. L. Moos, 159–172. Dordrecht: Springer.
Moos, L., K.K. Kofod, K. Hjort, and P.H. Raae. 2013c. Denmark: New links between education. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Chp 2), ed. L. Moos, 19–30. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mumby, D.K. 1996. Feminism, postmodernism, and organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly 9(3): 259–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318996009003001.
Mumby, D.K. 1997. Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory 7: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x.
Niemi, H. 2017. What is evidence required for and who generates that evidence in the Finnish education system? In Evidence and public good in educational policy, research, and practice (Educational Governance Research, vol. 6, ed. M.Y. Eryaman and B. Schneider, 43–62. Switzerland: Springer.
Norberg, K. 2001. The constitutive vales of Swedish schooling: A challenge to the inner life of schools. Pedagogy Culture and Society 9(3): 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360100200125.
Pantelidis, V.S. 2009. Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education 2(1–2): 59–70.
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital: In the twenty-first century. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reichenbach, R. 2010. Die Effizienz der Bildungssysteme und die Sinnkrise des schulischen Lernens. In Schule zwischen Effizienzkriterien und Sinnfragen, ed. J. Warwas and D. Sembill, 1–16. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
Ringarp, J. 2013. From Bildung to entrepreneurship: Trends in education policy in Sweden. Policy Futures in Education 11(4): 456–464. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.4.456.
Rudrum, D., and N. Stavris. 2015. Introduction. In Supplanting the postmodern: An anthology of writings on the arts and culture of the early 21st century (np), ed. D. Rudrum and N. Stavis. New York: Bloomsbury.
O’Neill, O. 2013. Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education 39(1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764761.
OECD. 2011. Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en.
Oelkers, J. 1994. Influence and development: Two basic paradigms of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13(2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075817.
Øygardslia, K. 2018. But this ısn’t school: Exploring tensions in the intersection between school and leisure activities in classroom game design. Learning, Media & Technology 43(1): 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1421553.
Saba, F. 2006. Critical issues in distance education: A report from the United States. Distance Education 26(2): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500168892.
Sahlberg, P. 2010. Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change 11: 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2.
Sahlberg, P. 2015. Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.
Salminen, J., L. Tornberg, and P. Venäläinen. 2016. Public institutions as learning environments in Finland. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 253–266. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Salo, P., E.M. Furu, and K. Rönnerman. 2008. Education policies and reforms: A Nordic perspective. In Nurturing praxis: Action research in partnerships between school and university in a Nordic light, vol. 3, ed. K. Rönnerman, E.M. Furu, and P. Salo, 11–20. Leiden: Brill.
Samuels, R. 2008. Auto-modernity after postmodernism: Autonomy and automation in culture, technology, and education. In Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected, ed. T. McPherson, 219–240. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Schönig, W. 2017. The transformation of school in a changing society—A German example. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 213–228. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Shwab, K. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Sheninger, E. 2014. Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Sigurðardóttir, H.D.I. 2016. Concern, creativity and compliance: The phenomenon of digital game-based learning in Norwegian Education (Ph.D. dissertation). Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Siljander, P. 2017. School in transition: The case of Finland. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 191–212. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Siljander, P., and A. Sutinen. 2012. Introduction. In Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism, ed. P. Siljander and A. Kivelä, 1–18. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.
Slavin, R., S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R.H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb, and R. Schumuck. 2013. Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
Snee, H., C. Hine, Y. Morey, H. Roberts, and H. Watson. 2016. Digital methods for social science: An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stoll, L., and J. Temperley. 2009. Creative leadership: A challenge of our times. School Leadership and Management 29(1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802646404.
Takeuchi, L.M., and S. Vaala. 2014. Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame.
Telhaug, A.O., O.A. Mediås, and P. Aasen. 2006. The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50(3): 245–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743274.
Thayer-Bacon, B.J. 2019a. Living during a technological revolution. Studies in Philosophy and Education 38(6): 577–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09684-x.
Thayer-Bacon, B.J. 2019b. Redefining work and education in the technological revolution. Studies in Philosophy and Education 38(6): 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09649-0.
Turner, L. 2011. The metamodernist manifesto. Retrieved from http://www.metamodernism.org.
World Economic Forum. 2017. The Global Human Capital Report 2017: Preparing people for the future of work. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Human_Capital_Report_2017.pdf.
Uljens, M., J. Møller, H. Ärlestig, and L.F. Frederiksen. 2013. The professionalisation of Nordic school leadership. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? Chp 9, ed. L. Moos, 133–158. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S., and H. Kynäslahti. 2016. ICTs in a school‘s everyday life—Developing the educational use of ICTs in Finnish schools of the future. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 241–252. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
van den Akker, R., A. Gibbons, and T. Vermeulen. 2017. Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Vartiainen, J., M. Aksela, and L. Vihma. 2016. LUMA Centre Finland. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 267–275. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Vermeulen, T., and R. van den Akker. 2015. Utopia, sort of a case study in metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica 87(1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2014.981964.
Vermeulen, T., and R. van den Akker. 2010. Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture 2: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.
World Economic Forum. 2017. The global human capital report 2017: Preparing people for the future of work. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Wu, H., S.W. Lee, H. Chang, and J. Liang. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education 62: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024.
Yousef, T. 2017. Modernism, postmodernism, and metamodernism: A critique. International Journal of Language and Literature 5(1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v5n1a5.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kilicoglu, G., Kilicoglu, D. The Birth of a New Paradigm: Rethinking Education and School Leadership with a Metamodern ‘Lens’. Stud Philos Educ 39, 493–514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09690-z
- Paradigm shift
- Changing schools
- School leadership
- Nordic education system