In this article, I examine the state of knowledge construction within the South African academe. This, I do by looking at how issues of epistemology and ontology are prioritised or negated in the social construction of knowledge. Focusing on what I have called ‘the problem of perspectives’, I show how ‘epistemological narcissism’ has often limited the scope of methodological and theoretical innovativeness. I argue that by relying on a set of certain theories that scholars have known and used over the years, and dismissing those that are considered ‘foreign’ (or non-African), the exercise of knowledge construction has become largely polemical.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Following these protests, at UCT for example, a campus wide Curriculum Change Working Group (CCWG) was established by the Vice Chancellor to explore ways of decolonising the curriculum.
Mbembe (2015). ‘Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive’. Available from: https://wiser.wits.ac.za/system/files/Achille%20Mbembe%20-%20Decolonizing%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20the%20Archive.pdf.
I owe my use of the notion of “seductive appeal” to the work of Alvesson, Ashcraft and Thomas (2008).
Coloniality is defined as “an invisible power structure that sustains colonial relations and domination long after the direct end of colonialism” (Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2012: 1). It differs from colonialism in the sense that, colonialism refers to a “political arrangement that has existed since time immemorial” (Maldonado-Torres 2017: 117). Drawing on this distinction, decolonisation needs to be then construed as a “political, epistemological and liberatory project” (Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2012: 1). As we shall see, the distinction between ‘coloniality’ and ‘colonialism’ is crucial in all the discussions around curriculum change in South Africa. Evidently, such discussions and calls have failed to separate these two from each other leading to ontological difficulties.
I argue here that one of the dangers of epistemological narcissism lies in the way it leads scholars to have some kind of bias towards their own preferred epistemological traditions. Elsewhere in literature, this is often referred to as “epistemological bias” (Howe 2002: 95).
Alvesson, M., L. Ashcraft, and R. Thomas. 2008. Identity Matters: Reflections on the Construction of Identity Scholarship in Organization Studies. Organization 15 (1): 5–28.
Asante, M.K. 1990. Kemet, Afrocentricity and Knowledge. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Asante, M.K. 1991. The Afrocentric Idea in Education. Journal of Negro Education 60: 170–179.
Asante, M.K. 2003. The Afrocentric Idea. In The Afrocentric Paradigm, ed. A. Mazama, 37–54. Asmara: Africa World Press.
Asante, M.K. 2007. An Afrocentric Manifesto: Toward an African Renaissance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cobb, W. 1997. Out of Africa: The Dilemmas of Afrocentricity. The Journal of Negro History 82 (1): 122–132.
Creswell, J.W. 2012. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Curriculum Change Working Group (CCWG). 2018. Curriculum Change Framework. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
Dastile, N.P. 2017. Beyond Euro-Western dominance: An African-centred decolonial paradigm. Africanus: Journal of Development Studies 43 (2): 93–104.
Geertz, C. 1974. “From the Native’s Point”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28 (1): 26–45.
Hacking, I. 1999. The Social Construction of What?. London: Harvard University Press.
Harris, N. 2003. A Philosophical Basis for an Afrocentric Orientation. In The Afrocentric Paradigm, ed. A. Mazama, 111–120. Asmara: Africa World Press.
Howe, K.R. 2002. On the Threat of Epistemological Bias. In Closing Methodological Divides: Toward Democratic Educational Research, ed. K.R. Howe, 95–110. Dordrecht: Springer.
Karenga, M. 2003. Afrocentricity and Multicultural Education: Concept, Challenge and Contribution. In The Afrocentric Paradigm, ed. A. Mazama, 73–94. Asmara: Africa World Press.
Kaschula, R.H. 2016. In Search of the African Voice in Higher Education: The Language Question. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 49: 199–214.
King, J.E., and E.E. Swartz. 2018. Heritage Knowledge in the Curriculum: Retrieving an African Episteme. New York: Routledge.
Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T.S. 1982. Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability. Proceedings of the Biannual Meeting of the Philosophy of Science, Volume Two (Symposia and Invited Papers) (pp. 669–688). https://philpapers.org/rec/KUHCCC-2. Accessed February 3, 2019.
Lefkowitz, M. 1997. Not out of Africa: How “Afrocentrism” Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History. New York: Basic Groups.
Maldonado-Torres, N. 2017. On the Coloniality of Human Rights. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 114: 117–136.
Mazama, A. 2001. The Afrocentric Paradigm: Contours and Definitions. Journal of Black Studies 31 (4): 387–405.
Mazama, A. 2003. The Afrocentric Paradigm. Asmara: Africa World Press.
Mbembe, A. 2015. Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive. https://wiser.wits.ac.za/system/files/Achille%20Mbembe%20%20Decolonizing%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20the%20Archive.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2019.
Mignolo, W.D. 2010. Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7–8): 159–181.
Narayan, K. 1993. How Native is a “Native” Anthropologist? American Anthropologist 95 (3): 671–686.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. 2012. Coloniality of Power in Development Studies and the Impact of Global Imperial Designs on Africa. Inaugural lecture, University of South Africa. http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/8548/Inugural%20lecture16%20October%202012.pdf.pdf.
Oyedemi, T. 2018. (De) coloniality and South African Academe. Critical Studies in Education (Online version of Record). https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1481123.
Popper, K. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Quijano, A. 2007. Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–178.
Saldana, J. 2011. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sewall, G.T. 1996. A Conflict of Visions: Multiculturalism and the Social Studies. In Public Education in a Multicultural Society: Policy, Theory, Critique, ed. R.F. Fullinwider, 49–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, C.J. 2005. In Defense of Materialism: A Critique of Afrocentric Ontology. Race & Class 47 (1): 35–48.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Nyawasha, T.S. ‘I am of Popper’, ‘I am of Asante’: The Polemics of Scholarship in South Africa. Stud Philos Educ 39, 415–428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09688-7
- Knowledge production
- African diaspora