Skip to main content

From Shared Fate to Shared Fates: An Approach for Civic Education

Studies in Philosophy and Education volume 38, pages 537–547 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

In order to facilitate cooperation to solve problems within a nation-state, a new approach which conceptualizes citizenship in terms of shared fate has been promoted to potentially ameliorate the tensions identified between civic liberty and solidarity. Proponents of an emphasis on shared fate frame it not in terms of a particular shared national identity, but in terms of participation in the shared project(s) of the nation-state. The approach of singular shared fate rightly emphasizes the urgency of finding a common ground for people to cultivate obligations to others and achieve sincere cooperation in a society. Unfortunately, in some cases it leaves room for some people to undermine the common ground and its good intention, however, as the promotion of a view of singular shared fate risks producing a hegemonic singular nation building project and predesigning an agreement before a truly inclusive and just dialogue among relevant stakeholders proceeds. To make the good intentions of the notion of shared fate realizable, a modification is explored, in recasting the concept of singular “shared fate” to plural “shared fates”. Given the situation that people in societies have the plural shared fates de facto, the view of plural shared fates recognizes that people will reject any singular substantial nation building project that has a predesigned direction. In current, divided societies, acknowledging multiple fates at the beginning, rather than predesigning a singular fate, can better provide a platform for all stakeholders (including citizens, would-be citizens, newcomers, and immigrants) to discuss their obligations to others toward sincere cooperation through equal co-construction of what is shared and what is not shared. To enhance civic education in a multicultural society, we suggest that complementing the concept of singular “shared fate” with a recognition of the value of plural “shared fates” can provide a context for all people to work together towards a more inclusive and just future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Apple, Michael. 2009. Foreword. In Education as a political tool in Asia, ed. Marie Lall and Edward Vickers, 11–13. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, James A. 2017. Citizenship education and global migration: Implications for theory, research, and teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, James A., Marcelo Súarez-Orozco, and Miriam Ben-Peretz. 2016. Global migration, diversity, and civic education: Improving policy and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2006. Citizenship under fire: Democratic education in times of conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2007. Civic virtue out of necessity: Patriotism and democratic education. Theory and Research in Education 5(1): 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2011. Wartime citizenship: An argument for shared fate. Ethnicities 11(3): 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2012. Citizenship as shared fate: Education for membership in a diverse democracy. Educational Theory 62(4): 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four essays on liberty. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Lawrence. 2014. Three educational values for a multicultural society: Difference recognition, national cohesion and equality. Journal of Moral Education 43(3): 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boler, Megan. 2004. All speech is not free: The ethics of “affirmative action pedagogy”. Counterpoints 240: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, Harry. 2003. Should we teach patriotic history? In Citizenship and education in liberal-democratic societies: Teaching for cosmopolitan values and collective identities, ed. Kevin McDonough and Walter Feinberg, 157–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, Nicholas C. 1993. Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, Nicholas C. 2006. Rethinking dialogue in networked spaces. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 6(1): 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, Nicholas C., and Suzanne Rice. 1991. Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Educational Review 61(4): 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callan, Eamonn. 1997. Creating citizens political education and liberal democracy. Oxford, NY: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, Margaret. 2000. Patriotism is not enough. British Journal of Political Science 30: 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Lynn. 2011. Response to ‘Wartime citizenship: An argument for shared fate’. Ethnicities 11(3): 326–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Panguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatimu, M.Wangeci. 2009. Undermining critical consciousness unconsciously: Restoring hope in the multicultural education idea. Journal of Educational Change 10(1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, Ronald David. 2004. Moral and political clarity and education as a practice of freedom. Counterpoints 240: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT PRess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, Mark. 2004. Schooling and cultural maintenance for religious minorities in the liberal state. In Education and citizenship in liberal-democratic societies: Teaching for cosmopolitan values and collective identities, ed. Kevin McDonough and Walter Feinberg, 273–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Diana. 2011. Discussions that drive democracy. Educational Leadership 69(1): 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Liz. 2008. Dialogic pedagogy for social justice: A critical examination. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27(2): 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Liz. 2014. Wont somebody think of the children?’ Emotions, child poverty, and post humanitarian possibilities for social justice education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 46(9): 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Alison. 2004. Talking cure: The desire for dialogue. Counterpoints 240: 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazepides, Tasos. 2010. Education as dialogue: Its prerequisites and its enemies. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Simon. 2005. Patriotism as bad faith. Ethics 115(3): 563–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism, citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, Gloria. 2004. New direction in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In Handbook of research on multicultural education, ed. Cherry McGee Banks and James Banks, 50–65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamphere, Louise. 2007. Migration, assimilation and the cultural construction of identity: Navajo perspectives. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1132–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Meira. 2012. No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, Cris. 2004. The tolerance that dare not speak its name. Counterpoints 240: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnich, Elizabeth Kamarck. 1990. Transforming knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2006. Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Basingstoke, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Andrew. 2007. Multiculturalism and the foundations of meaningful life: Reconciling autonomy, identity, and community. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffari, Siavash. 2012. Limitations of dialogue: Conflict resolution in the context of power asymmetries and neglected differences. In Towards the dignity of difference?: Neither ‘end of history’ nor ‘clash of civilizations, ed. Mojtaba Mahdavi and W.Andy Knight, 245–260. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, Dilys, and Ira Bogotch. 2010. Moving beyond ‘diversity’ to ‘social justice’: The challenge to re-conceptualize multicultural education. Intercultural Education 21(1): 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2006. Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles, and Amy Gutmann. 1994. Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, James. 1995. Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Melissa. 2004. Citizenship as identity, citizenship as shared fate, and the functions of multicultural education. In Education and citizenship in liberal-democratic societies: Teaching for cosmopolitan values and collective identities, ed. Kevin McDonough and Walter Feinberg, 208–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Melissa. 2010. Citizenship as agency within communities of shared fate. In Unsettled legitimacy: Political community, power, and authority in a global era, ed. William Coleman and Steven Bernstein, 33–52. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, Michalinos. 2012. Citizenship education and human rights in sites of ethnic conflict: Toward critical pedagogies of compassion and shared fate. Studies in Philosophy and Education 31(6): 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Run Me Shaw Building 401, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China

    Cong Lin & Liz Jackson

Authors
  1. Cong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liz Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Lin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, C., Jackson, L. From Shared Fate to Shared Fates: An Approach for Civic Education. Stud Philos Educ 38, 537–547 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09658-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09658-z

Keywords

  • Shared fate
  • Share fates
  • Diversity
  • Citizenship
  • Dialogue
  • Civic education