Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 499–512 | Cite as

Teaching is Oppositional: On the Importance of Supporting Experimental Teaching During Student Teaching

  • Jeff Frank
Article

Abstract

This paper has two interrelated goals. The first is to introduce a framework: oppositional democracy. The second is to use this framework to address what I see as a central problem that occurs when learning to teach: the moment when someone with power tells an aspiring teacher that something she hopes to accomplish is unrealistic. The framework of oppositional democracy helps us understand this problem while also suggesting responses that free an aspiring teacher to experiment in responsible ways, thereby empowering her to work against practices she does not want to be complicit in perpetuating.

Keywords

Teacher education Student teaching Oppositional democracy Egalitarianism Democracy and education edTPA Elizabeth Anderson 

References

  1. Anderson, D. 2007. The role of cooperating teachers’ power in student teaching. Education 128(2): 307–323.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. 2009. Democracy: Instrumental vs. non-instrumental value. In Contemporary debates in political philosophy, ed. T. Christiano and J. Christman, 213–227. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. 2012. Equality. In The Oxford handbook of political philosophy, ed. D. Estlund, 40–57. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, E. 2017. The problem of equality from a political economy perspective. In Oxford studies in political philosophy, vol. 3, ed. D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, and S. Wall, 36–57. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berliner, D. 2011. Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education 41(3): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berliner, D., and G. Glass. 2014. 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Biesta, G. 2016. Good education in an age of measurement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Carini, P., and M. Himley. 2010. Jenny’s story: Taking the long view of the child. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, A., V. Triggs, and W. Nielsen. 2014. Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education. Review of Educational Research 84(2): 163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., and S.L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Compton, M., and L. Weiner. 2008. The global assault on teaching. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Crocco, M., and A. Costigan. 2007. The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability. Urban Education 42(6): 512–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darling-Hammond, L. 2014. Strengthening clinical preparation: The Holy Grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education 89(4): 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. 2017. Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Delpit, L. 2006. Other people’s children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. 2008. Experience and education. In John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, vol. 13, ed. J.A. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Feiman-Nemser, S. 2006. A teacher educator looks at democracy and education. In John Dewey and our educational prospect, ed. D. Hansen, 129–146. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  18. Feiman-Nemser, S. 2012. Teachers as learners. Cambridge: Harvard Education Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Feiman-Nemser, S., and M. Buchmann. 1983. Pitfalls of experience in teacher education. Occasional Paper 65. East Lansing: The Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  20. Feiman-Nemser, S., E. Tamir, and K. Hammerness. 2014. Inspiring teaching. Cambridge: Harvard Education Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Forzani, F.M. 2014. Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education 65(4): 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frank, J. 2017. Realizing a democratic community of teachers: John Dewey and the idea of a science of education. Education Sciences 7: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennedy, M.M. 2016. Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 67(1): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Labaree, D. 2011. Do no harm. Teacher Education and Practice 24(4): 437–439.Google Scholar
  25. Goldhaber, D., J. Cowan, and R. Theobald. 2017. Evaluating prospective teachers: Testing the predictive validity of the edTPA. Journal of Teacher Education 68(4): 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green, E. 2014. Building a better teacher. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Hammerness, K., and E. Craig. 2016. “Context-specific” teacher preparation for New York City. Urban Education 51(10): 1226–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen, D.T. 2001. Exploring the moral heart of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hansen, D.T. 2004. A poetics of teaching. Educational Theory 54(2): 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, P.W. 1986. The practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, P.W. 1990. Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, P.W. 2011. What is education?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, J. 2012. “I want to test my own unique ideas:” Tension in the teacher candidate-cooperating teacher relationship. In Agency through teacher education: Reflection community, and learning, ed. R. Flessner, K. Patrizio, and J. Horwitz, 131–142. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Kahlenberg, R. 2014. A smarter charter: Finding what works for charter schools and public education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kazemi, E., M. Franke, and M. Lampert. 2009. Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia,, vol. 1, eds. R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, and T. Burgess, 12–30. Palmerston North: MERGA.Google Scholar
  36. Kirp, D. 2015. Improbable scholars. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Levine, A. 2006. Educating school teachers. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504144.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
  38. Martinez, M.R., and D. McGrath. 2014. Deeper learning. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, M., E. Kazemi, and S.S. Kavanagh. 2013. Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education 64(5): 378–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McNay, M. 2003. Power and authority in teacher education. Educational Forum 68(1): 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Medearis, J. 2015. Why democracy is oppositional. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meier, D. 2002. The power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  43. Paine, L., and K. Zeichner. 2012. The local and the global in reforming teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education Review 56(4): 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Palmer, P. 2007. The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Pecheone, R.L., and A. Whittaker. 2016. Well-prepared teachers inspire student learning. Phi Delta Kappan 97(7): 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritchart, R. 2015. Creating cultures of thinking. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Sahlberg, P. 2011. Finnish lessons. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Santoro, D. 2011. Good teaching in difficult times: Demoralization in the pursuit of good work. American Journal of Education 118(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Santoro, D. 2018. Demoralized. Cambridge: Harvard Education Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Sato, M. 2014. What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA? Journal of Teacher Education 65(5): 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, C. 1992. Ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, T.S. 2015. Philosophical tools for understanding the moral complexity of school choice. Studies in Philosophy of Education 34(2): 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson, T.S. 2016. Contesting the public school: Reconsidering Charter schools as counterpublics. American Educational Research Journal 53(4): 919–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolin, S. 2008. Democracy incorporated. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Zeichner, K. 2009. Changing the epistemology of teacher education. Teacher Education and Practice 22(4): 488–491.Google Scholar
  56. Zeichner, K. 2010. Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 61(1–2): 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeichner, K., K.A. Payne, and K. Brayko. 2015. Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 66(2): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Lawrence UniversityCantonUSA

Personalised recommendations