Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 265–285 | Cite as

The Logic of Deferral: Educational Aims and Intellectual Disability

  • Ashley Taylor
Article

Abstract

The educational aims described by educational philosophers rarely embrace the full range of differences in intellectual ability, adaptive behavior, or communication that children exhibit. Because envisioned educational aims have significant consequences for how educational practices, pedagogy, and curricula are conceptualized, the failure to acknowledge and embrace differences in ability leaves open the question of the extent to which students with intellectual disabilities are subject to the same aims as their “typically-developing” peers. In articulating and defending valued aims of education, educational philosophers tacitly or expressly concede that particular aims will be ill suited to many children with intellectual disabilities, and that separate aims will therefore apply to them. This paper evaluates the philosophical reasoning behind this conclusion that some people, by necessity, must be governed by separate educational aims, to be decided separately and secondarily. The author calls this the “deferral stance.” First, the paper outlines concerns about a particular ability-biased social and epistemic context in which theorizing about educational aims takes place. The author then examines assumptions that underpin the logic of deferral, arguing that the logic proves flawed when subjected to conceptual and empirical scrutiny. The paper concludes by outlining an inclusive approach—the affirmative stance—to theorizing about educational aims that resists the logic of exclusion and deferral.

Keywords

Educational aims Intellectual disability Educational equality Epistemic justice Inclusive education 

References

  1. Ahlberg, Jaime. 2014. Educational justice for students with cognitive disabilities. Social Philosophy and Policy 31(1): 15–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2007. Fair opportunity in education: A Democratic Equality perspective. Ethics 117(4): 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artiles, Alfredo J. 2011. Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational equity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher 40(9): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artiles, Alfredo J., Robert Rueda, Jesús José Salazar, and Ignacio Higareda. 2002. English-language learner representation in special education in California urban school districts. In Racial inequity in special education, ed. D.J. Losen, and G. Orfield, 117–136. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  6. Artiles, A.J., R. Rueda, J.J. Salazar, and I. Higareda. 2005. Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children 71(3): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashby, Christine. 2010. The trouble with normal: The struggle for meaningful access for middle school students with developmental disability labels. Disability and Society 25(3): 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baglieri, Susan, and Arthur Shapiro. 2012. Disability studies and the inclusive classroom: Critical practices for creating least restrictive attitudes. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Baynton, Douglas C. 2013. Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. In The disability studies reader, 4th ed, ed. Lennard J. Davis, 17–33. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2012. Citizenship as shared fate: Education for membership in a diverse democracy. Educational Theory 62(4): 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biklen, Douglas. 2005. Autism and the myth of the person alone. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  12. Biklen, Douglas, and Jamie Burke. 2006. Presuming competence. Equity and Excellence in Education 39(2): 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boxall, Kathy, Iain Carson, and Daniel Docherty. 2004. Room at the academy? People with learning difficulties and higher education. Disability and Society 19(2): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brantlinger, Ellen. 1997. Using ideology: Cases of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of educational research 67(4): 425–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brantlinger, E. 2004. Ideologies discerned, values determined: Getting past the hierarchies of special education. In Ideology and the politics of (in)exclusion, ed. L. Ware, 11–31. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Brighouse, Harry. 2006. On education. NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Callan, Eammon. 1997. Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlson, Licia. 2010. The faces of intellectual disability: Philosophical reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cigman, Ruth. 2007. A question of universality: Inclusive education and the principle of respect. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41(4): 775–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clifford, Stacy. 2012. Making disability public in deliberative democracy. Contemporary Political Theory 11(2): 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colmar, Susan, Amanda Maxwell, and Leanne Miller. 2006. Assessing intellectual disability in children: Are IQ measures sufficient, or even necessary? Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools 16(2): 177–188.Google Scholar
  22. Danforth, Scot, Steve Taff, and Philip M. Ferguson. 2006. Place, profession, and program in the history of special education curriculum. In Who benefits from special education, ed. Ellen Brantlinger, 1–25. NY: Routlege.Google Scholar
  23. Daniel, Larry G., and Debra A. King. 1997. Impact of inclusion education on academic achievement, student behavior and self-esteem, and parental attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research. 91(2): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis, Lennard J. 2006. Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. In The disability studies reader, 2nd ed, ed. Lennard J. Davis, 3–16. NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  25. DesRoches, Sarah J. 2016. An education of shared fates: Recasting citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35(6): 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dessemontet, Sermier, Gérard Bless Rachel, and Diane Morin. 2012. Effects of inclusion on the academic achievement and adaptive behaviour of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 56(6): 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and education. NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ferri, Beth A. 2012. Undermining inclusion? A critical reading of response to intervention (RTI). International Journal of Inclusive Education 16(8): 863–880.Google Scholar
  29. Ferri, Beth A., and David J. Connor. 2005a. In the shadow of brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color. Remedial and Special Education 26(2): 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferri, Beth A., and David J. Connor. 2005b. Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record 107(3): 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferri, Beth A., and David J. Connor. 2006. Reading resistance: Discourses of Exclusion in desegregation & inclusion debates. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Fierros, Edward Garcia, and James W. Conroy. 2002. Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. In Racial inequity in special education, ed. D.J. Losen, and G. Orfield, 39–70. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallagher, Deborah J. 2010. Hiding in plain sight: The nature and role of theory in learning disability labeling. Disability Studies Quarterly 30(2). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1231/1278.
  35. Gallagher, Deborah J., David J. Connor, and Beth A. Ferri. 2014. Beyond the far too incessant schism: Special education and the social model of disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education 18(11): 1120–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glass, Ronald D. 2000. Education and the ethics of democratic citizenship. Studies in Philosophy and Education 19(3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  38. Gould, Steven J. 1981. The Mismeasure of man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  39. Gutmann, Amy. 1987. Democratic education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanson, Jarrod S., and Kenneth R. Howe. 2011. The potential for deliberative democratic education. Democracy and Education 19(2): 1–9.Google Scholar
  42. Hardman, Michael L., and Shirley Dawson. 2008. The Impact of federal public policy on curriculum and instruction for students with disabilities in the general classroom. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 52(2): 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hehir, Thomas. 2002. Eliminating ableism in education. Harvard Educational Review 72(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jencks, Christopher. 1988. Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal? Ethics 98(3): 518–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kittay, Eva F. 2010. The personal is philosophical is political: A philosopher and mother of a cognitively disabled person sends notes from the battlefield. In Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy, ed. Eva F. Kittay, and Licia Carlson, 393–413. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kjellberg, Anette. 2002. Being a citizen. Disability and Society 17(2): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kliewer, Christopher. 1998. Schooling children with down syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility. NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kliewer, Christopher, Douglas Biklen, and Amy Petersen. 2015. At the end of intellectual disability. Harvard Educational Review 85(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lekan, Todd. 2009. Disabilities and educational opportunity: A Deweyan approach. Transactions of the Charles S. Pierce Society 45(2): 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leonardo, Zeus, and Alicia A. Broderick. 2011. Smartness as property: A critical exploration of the intersections between whiteness and disability studies. Teachers College Record 113(10): 2206–2232.Google Scholar
  52. Levinson, Meira. 1999. The demands of liberal education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Levinson, Meira. 2003. Challenging deliberation. Theory and Research in Education 1(1): 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levinson, Meira. 2012. No citizen left behind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lindkvist, Heather L. 2008. The reach and limits of cultural accommodation: Public schools and Somali Muslim immigrants in Maine. In Just schools: Pursuing equality in societies of difference, ed. Martha Minow, Richard A. Shweder, and Hazel Rose Markus, 164–203. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Lipman, Pauline. 2011. The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Luckasson, Ruth A., and Alya Reeve. 2001. Naming, defining, and classifying in mental retardation. Mental Retardation 39(1): 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lynch, Kathleen, and John Baker. 2005. Equality in education: An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education 3(2): 131–164.Google Scholar
  59. Mackenzie, Catriona, and Jackie Leach Scull. 2007. Moral imagination, disability and embodiment. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(4): 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McGuire, Anne E., and Rod Michalko. 2011. Minds between us: Autism, mindblindness and the uncertainty of communication. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(2): 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Meier, Deborah. 2002. The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  62. Merry, Michael S. 2008. Educational justice and the gifted. Theory and Research in Education 6(1): 47–70.Google Scholar
  63. Minow, Martha. 2013. Universal design in education: Remaking all the difference. In Righting educational wrongs: Disability studies in law and education, ed. Arlene S. Kanter, and Beth A. Ferri, 38–57. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Morton, Jennifer. 2011. The non-cognitive challenge to liberal egalitarian education. Theory and Research in Education 9(3): 233–250.Google Scholar
  65. Norwich, Brahm. 2010. A response to special educational needs: A new look. In Special educational needs: A new look, ed. Lorella Terzi, 47–111. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  66. Oakes, Jeannie. 2005. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Payne, Elizabethe, and Melissa Smith. 2012. Rethinking safe schools approaches for LGBTQ students: Changing the questions we ask. Multicultural Perspectives 14(4): 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  69. Rea, Patricia J., Virginia L. McLaughlin, and Chriss Walther-Thomas. 2002. Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pull out programs. Exceptional Children 68: 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reich, Rob. 2002. Opting out of education: Yoder, mozert, and the autonomy of children. Educational Theory 52(4): 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reid, D.Kim, and Jan Weatherly Valle. 2004. The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent–school relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities 37(6): 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rood, Carrie E., Arlene Kanter, and Julie Causton. 2015. Presumption of incompetence: The systematic assignment of guardianship within the transition process. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 39(4): 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rubin, Susan, Doug Biklen, Christi Kasa-Hendrickson, Paula Kluth, Donald N. Cardinal, and Alicia Broderick. 2001. Independence, participation, and the meaning of intellectual ability. Disability and Society 16(3): 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Samuels, Ellen. 2017. Six ways of looking at crip time. Disability Studies Quarterly 37(3). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5824/4684.
  75. Satz, Debra. 2007. Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics 117(4): 623–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schalock, Robert L., Ruth A. Luckasson, and Karrie A. Shogren. 2007. The renaming of mental retardation: Understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 45(2): 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schweik, Susan M. 2009. The ugly laws: Disability in public. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Siebers, Tobin. 2009. Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  79. Silvers, Anita. 2003. On the possibility and desirability of constructing a neutral conception of disability. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24(6): 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Silvers, Anita. 2009. No talent? Beyond the worst off! A diverse theory of justice for disability. In Disability and disadvantage, ed. Kimberley Brownlee, and Adam Cureton, 163–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strike, Kenneth. 2004. Community, the missing element of school reform: Why schools should be more like congregations. American Journal of Education 110(3): 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stringer, Phil. 2009. Dynamic assessment for inclusive learning. In Psychology for inclusive education, ed. P. Hick, R. Kershner, and P.T. Farell, 127–138. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Taylor, Ashley. In Press. Knowledge citizens? Intellectual disability and the production of social meanings within educational research. Harvard Educational Review.Google Scholar
  84. Taylor, Steven J. 2000. You’re not a retard, you’re just wise: Disability, social identity, and family networks. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29(1): 58–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Terzi, Lorella. 2008. Justice and equality in education: A capability perspective on disability and special educational needs. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  86. Thomson, R.G. 1997. Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American Culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Trent, James W. 1994. Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  88. Vehmas, Simo, and Pekka Mäkelä. 2009. The ontology of disability and impairment: A discussion of the natural and social features. In Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives, ed. K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas, and T. Shakespeare, 42–56. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Vorhaus, John. 2005. Citizenship, competence and profound disability. Journal of Philosophy of Education 39(3): 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vorhaus, John. 2006. Respecting profoundly disabled learners. Journal of Philosophy of Education 40(3): 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Warnock, Mary. 2010. Special educational needs: A new look. In Special educational needs: A new look, ed. Lorella Terz, 11–45. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  92. Wolff, Jonathon. 2010. Cognitive disability in a society of equals. In Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy, ed. Eva Feder Kittay, and Licia Carlson. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colgate UniversityHamiltonUSA

Personalised recommendations