Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 451–465 | Cite as

The Flipped Curriculum: Dewey’s Pragmatic University

  • Aaron Stoller
Article

Abstract

Recently Graham Badley (Stud High Educ 41(4):631–641, 2016) made the case that the "pragmatic university” represents a viable future for the post-modern institution. In his construction of the pragmatic university, Badley largely draws upon the vision laid out by Richard Rorty (Philosophy and social hope. Penguin Books, London, 1999). While Rorty’s neopragmatism offers an important perspective on the pragmatic institution, I believe that John Dewey’s classical pragmatism offers a richer and more capable vision of the university. The aim of this paper is to develop a view of the pragmatic university drawn from Dewey’s philosophy. His writings on the university offer a unique and viable path forward because he directly engages a reconstruction of the relationship between knowledge and experience in the context of post-secondary education.

Keywords

John Dewey Higher education Pedagogy Curriculum Inquiry 

References

  1. Arum, R., and J. Roksa. 2011. Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Badley, G. 2016. The pragmatic university: A feasible utopia? Studies in Higher Education 41(4): 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. 2004. Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development 23(3): 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. 2011. The idea of the university in the twenty-first century: Where’s the imagination? Journal of Higher Education 1(2): 88–94.Google Scholar
  5. Barrow, L.H. 2006. A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education 17(3): 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, J.L., and M.A. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings 30(9): 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Bloland, P.A., R. Rodgers, and L.C. Stamatakos. 1994. Reform in student affairs. Greensboro, NC: Capps Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cormier, D. 2008. Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of online education 4(5): 2.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. 1971. Self-realization as the moral ideal. EW, Vol. 4, pp. 42–53. (Original work published in 1893).Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. 1972. Plan of the Organization of the University Primary School. EW, Vol. 5, pp. 223–243. (Original work published in 1897).Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. 1976a. The school and society. MW, Vol. 1. pp. 1–112. (Original work published in 1899).Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. 1980a. Democracy and education. MW, Vol. 9. (Original work published in 1916).Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. 1980b. An added note as to the “practical” in Essays in experimental logic. MW, Vol. 10, pp. 366–369. (Original work published in 1916).Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. 1981. Experience and nature. LW, Vol, 1. (Original work published in 1925).Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. 1984. From absolutism to experimentalism. LW, Vol. 5. pp. 147–160. (Original work published in 1930).Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. 1985a. The way out of educational confusion. LW, Vol. 6, pp. 75–89. (Original work published in 1931).Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. 1985b. College sons—and parents. Review of Christian Gauss’s life in college. LW, Vol. 6, pp. 259–262. (Original work published in 1931).Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. 1985c. Statements on the conference on curriculum for the college of the liberal arts. LW, Vol. 6, pp. 414–423. (Original work published in 1931).Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. 1986a. How we think. LW, Vol. 8, pp. 105–352. (Original work published in 1933).Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. 1986b. Logic: The theory of inquiry. LW, Vol. 12. (Original work published in 1938).Google Scholar
  21. Dewey, J. 1987. President Hutchins’ proposal to remake higher education. LW, Vol. 11, pp. 397–401. (Original work published in 1937).Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. 1989. The problem of the liberal arts college. LW, Vol. 15, pp. 276–280. (Original work published in 1944).Google Scholar
  23. Feinberg, W. 2016. What is a public education and why we need it: A philosophical inquiry into self-development, cultural commitment, and public engagement. Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. Garrison, J. 1995. Deweyan pragmatism and the epistemology of contemporary social constructivism. American Educational Research Journal 32(4): 716–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garrison, J. 2007. Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ginsberg, B. 2011 Administrators ate my tuition. Washington Monthly. Retrieved from https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/septoct-2011/administrators-ate-my-tuition/.
  27. Hall, R., and K. Smyth. 2016. Dismantling the curriculum in higher education. Open Library of Humanities 2(1): 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heldke, L. 2005. Robert Maynard Hutchins, John Dewey, and the nature of the liberal arts. The Cresset (Advent/Christmas 2005), 8–13.Google Scholar
  29. Hickman, L. 1990. Dewey’s pragmatic technology. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hugo, R. 1992. The triggering town: lectures and essays on poetry and writing. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. (Originally published in 1979).Google Scholar
  31. Hutchins, R.M. 1936. The higher learning in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, M. 2014. Experiencing language: What’s missing in linguistic pragmatism? European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6(2): 14–27.Google Scholar
  33. Johnston, J.S. 2011. The Dewey–Hutchins debate: A dispute over moral teleology. Educational Theory 61(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. June, A. W. 2017. 5 Forces that drive administrative ‘bloat’. The chronicle of higher education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/5-Forces-That-Drive/240160.
  35. Kolb, D. 2014. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Pearson Educational Press. (Original work published in 1984).Google Scholar
  36. Lage, M.J., G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education 31(1): 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leef, G. 2017. A big reason for the rising cost and falling quality of college. The National Review. Retrieved from http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/448701/martin-center-article-administrative-bloat-college.
  38. Marcus, J. 2016. The reason behind colleges’ ballooning bureaucracies. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/10/ballooning-bureaucracies-shrinking-checkbooks/503066/.
  39. McEwan, H. 2001. On making things difficult for learners. In Philosophy of education 2000, ed. L. Stone, 258–266. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
  40. Nathan, R. 2005. My freshman year: What a professor learned by becoming a student. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Osberg, D., and G. Biesta. 2008. The emergent curriculum: Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies 40(3): 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Philpott, J.L., and C. Strange. 2003. “On the road to Cambridge” A case study of faculty and student affairs in collaboration. The Journal of Higher Education 74(1): 77–95.Google Scholar
  43. Ralston S. J. 2011, The prospect of an ideal liberal arts college curriculum: Reconstructing the Dewey–Hutchins debate. Black Mountain College Studies, No. 1 (Spring), http://www.blackmountainstudiesjournal.org/wp/?page_id=32.
  44. Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  45. Sandeen, A. 2004. Educating the whole student: The growing academic importance of student affairs. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 36(3): 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Snyder, B.R. 1971. The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Starratt, R.J. 2002. Community as curriculum. In Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration, ed. Leithwood, A. Kenneth, and P. Hallinger, 321–348. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoller, A. 2015. Taylorism and the logic of learning outcomes. Journal of Curriculum Studies 47(3): 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waks, L. 1997. Experimentalism and the higher learning: John Dewey’s theory of the University. Unpublished essay. Retrieved from: goo.gl/yR7OOy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colorado SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations