The Flipped Curriculum: Dewey’s Pragmatic University

Abstract

Recently Graham Badley (Stud High Educ 41(4):631–641, 2016) made the case that the "pragmatic university” represents a viable future for the post-modern institution. In his construction of the pragmatic university, Badley largely draws upon the vision laid out by Richard Rorty (Philosophy and social hope. Penguin Books, London, 1999). While Rorty’s neopragmatism offers an important perspective on the pragmatic institution, I believe that John Dewey’s classical pragmatism offers a richer and more capable vision of the university. The aim of this paper is to develop a view of the pragmatic university drawn from Dewey’s philosophy. His writings on the university offer a unique and viable path forward because he directly engages a reconstruction of the relationship between knowledge and experience in the context of post-secondary education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a more robust articulation of the differences between Dewey and Rorty on this issue, see Garrison (1995) and Johnson (2014).

  2. 2.

    I am regrettably unable to offer full analysis of the debate. I would refer readers to Heldke (2005) and Johnston (2011) for excellent analyses of the contours of Dewey and Hutchins’ arguments.

  3. 3.

    There are interesting discussions arising around the notion of the distributed curriculum that have a particular resonance with this aspect of a Deweyan view of higher education. I would refer readers to Robert J. Starratt’s notion of community as curriculum (Starrat 2002) and Dave Cormier’s concept of rhizomatic education (Cormier 2008).

References

  1. Arum, R., and J. Roksa. 2011. Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Badley, G. 2016. The pragmatic university: A feasible utopia? Studies in Higher Education 41(4): 631–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett, R. 2004. Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development 23(3): 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett, R. 2011. The idea of the university in the twenty-first century: Where’s the imagination? Journal of Higher Education 1(2): 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrow, L.H. 2006. A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education 17(3): 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bishop, J.L., and M.A. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings 30(9): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bloland, P.A., R. Rodgers, and L.C. Stamatakos. 1994. Reform in student affairs. Greensboro, NC: Capps Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cormier, D. 2008. Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of online education 4(5): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dewey, J. 1971. Self-realization as the moral ideal. EW, Vol. 4, pp. 42–53. (Original work published in 1893).

  10. Dewey, J. 1972. Plan of the Organization of the University Primary School. EW, Vol. 5, pp. 223–243. (Original work published in 1897).

  11. Dewey, J. 1976a. The school and society. MW, Vol. 1. pp. 1–112. (Original work published in 1899).

  12. Dewey, J. 1980a. Democracy and education. MW, Vol. 9. (Original work published in 1916).

  13. Dewey, J. 1980b. An added note as to the “practical” in Essays in experimental logic. MW, Vol. 10, pp. 366–369. (Original work published in 1916).

  14. Dewey, J. 1981. Experience and nature. LW, Vol, 1. (Original work published in 1925).

  15. Dewey, J. 1984. From absolutism to experimentalism. LW, Vol. 5. pp. 147–160. (Original work published in 1930).

  16. Dewey, J. 1985a. The way out of educational confusion. LW, Vol. 6, pp. 75–89. (Original work published in 1931).

  17. Dewey, J. 1985b. College sons—and parents. Review of Christian Gauss’s life in college. LW, Vol. 6, pp. 259–262. (Original work published in 1931).

  18. Dewey, J. 1985c. Statements on the conference on curriculum for the college of the liberal arts. LW, Vol. 6, pp. 414–423. (Original work published in 1931).

  19. Dewey, J. 1986a. How we think. LW, Vol. 8, pp. 105–352. (Original work published in 1933).

  20. Dewey, J. 1986b. Logic: The theory of inquiry. LW, Vol. 12. (Original work published in 1938).

  21. Dewey, J. 1987. President Hutchins’ proposal to remake higher education. LW, Vol. 11, pp. 397–401. (Original work published in 1937).

  22. Dewey, J. 1989. The problem of the liberal arts college. LW, Vol. 15, pp. 276–280. (Original work published in 1944).

  23. Feinberg, W. 2016. What is a public education and why we need it: A philosophical inquiry into self-development, cultural commitment, and public engagement. Maryland: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garrison, J. 1995. Deweyan pragmatism and the epistemology of contemporary social constructivism. American Educational Research Journal 32(4): 716–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garrison, J. 2007. Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ginsberg, B. 2011 Administrators ate my tuition. Washington Monthly. Retrieved from https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/septoct-2011/administrators-ate-my-tuition/.

  27. Hall, R., and K. Smyth. 2016. Dismantling the curriculum in higher education. Open Library of Humanities 2(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heldke, L. 2005. Robert Maynard Hutchins, John Dewey, and the nature of the liberal arts. The Cresset (Advent/Christmas 2005), 8–13.

  29. Hickman, L. 1990. Dewey’s pragmatic technology. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hugo, R. 1992. The triggering town: lectures and essays on poetry and writing. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. (Originally published in 1979).

  31. Hutchins, R.M. 1936. The higher learning in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson, M. 2014. Experiencing language: What’s missing in linguistic pragmatism? European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6(2): 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Johnston, J.S. 2011. The Dewey–Hutchins debate: A dispute over moral teleology. Educational Theory 61(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. June, A. W. 2017. 5 Forces that drive administrative ‘bloat’. The chronicle of higher education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/5-Forces-That-Drive/240160.

  35. Kolb, D. 2014. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Pearson Educational Press. (Original work published in 1984).

  36. Lage, M.J., G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education 31(1): 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Leef, G. 2017. A big reason for the rising cost and falling quality of college. The National Review. Retrieved from http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/448701/martin-center-article-administrative-bloat-college.

  38. Marcus, J. 2016. The reason behind colleges’ ballooning bureaucracies. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/10/ballooning-bureaucracies-shrinking-checkbooks/503066/.

  39. McEwan, H. 2001. On making things difficult for learners. In Philosophy of education 2000, ed. L. Stone, 258–266. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.

  40. Nathan, R. 2005. My freshman year: What a professor learned by becoming a student. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Osberg, D., and G. Biesta. 2008. The emergent curriculum: Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies 40(3): 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Philpott, J.L., and C. Strange. 2003. “On the road to Cambridge” A case study of faculty and student affairs in collaboration. The Journal of Higher Education 74(1): 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ralston S. J. 2011, The prospect of an ideal liberal arts college curriculum: Reconstructing the Dewey–Hutchins debate. Black Mountain College Studies, No. 1 (Spring), http://www.blackmountainstudiesjournal.org/wp/?page_id=32.

  44. Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sandeen, A. 2004. Educating the whole student: The growing academic importance of student affairs. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 36(3): 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Snyder, B.R. 1971. The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Starratt, R.J. 2002. Community as curriculum. In Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration, ed. Leithwood, A. Kenneth, and P. Hallinger, 321–348. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stoller, A. 2015. Taylorism and the logic of learning outcomes. Journal of Curriculum Studies 47(3): 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Waks, L. 1997. Experimentalism and the higher learning: John Dewey’s theory of the University. Unpublished essay. Retrieved from: goo.gl/yR7OOy.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Stoller.

Additional information

Aaron Stoller is the author of Knowing and Learning as Creative Action: A Reexamination of the Epistemological Foundations of Education (Palgrave MacMillan, 2014). He lives in Colorado Springs, CO, USA, where he teaches at Colorado College and directs the first year experience program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoller, A. The Flipped Curriculum: Dewey’s Pragmatic University. Stud Philos Educ 37, 451–465 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9592-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • John Dewey
  • Higher education
  • Pedagogy
  • Curriculum
  • Inquiry