Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 425–441 | Cite as

The ‘Crucified’ Leader: Cynicism, Fantasies and Paradoxes in Education

  • Dion Rüsselbæk Hansen
  • Lars Frode Frederiksen
Article

Abstract

In this paper we argue that transnational as well as national political demands and expectations on the educational field are contributing to (re)produce four ideological-based educational leadership discourses in the literature. In order to conceptualize these discourses, we turn to the work of Schmidt (Diagnosis I—Filosoferende eksperimenter. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 1999, On respect. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 2011) and Zizek (Mapping ideology. Verso, New York, 2000, The sublime object of ideology. Verso, New York, 2008a). On that basis we identify four dominant educational leadership discourses: (a) a personhood-based discourse, (b) a profession-based discourse, (c) a standard-based discourse, and (d) a resource-based discourse. These discourses have—as we will show—various consequences for the way we think and talk about education and educational leadership in our age. Using examples that stem from a project about educational leadership in Danish upper secondary school, we will illustrate how educational leaders’ beings and doings are ‘regulated’ by these discourses, which place them in a tension field where different and conflicting (ideological) fantasies seem to be played out. Then, we will discuss how these fantasies can be challenged and how we can think and speak more intellectually about education and educational leadership. By using the term intellectual we are referring to educational leaders’ ability as human beings to critically reflect on their contemporary doings and beings within and beyond the existing social order. Hopefully this can help them (and us) to establish new ways for discussing not only what educational leadership is and should be about, but also what it could be about.

Keywords

Educational leadership Paradoxes Cynicism Tendencies Fantasies and ideologies 

References

  1. Adnett, N., and P. Davies. 2002. Education as a positional good: Implications for market-based reforms of state schooling. British Journal of Educational Studies 50(2): 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. 2009. Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Avolio, B.J., and L.W. Gardner. 2005. Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly 16: 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S.J. 2008. The education debate. University of Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G.J.J. 2006. Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G.J.J. 2009. Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21(1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Power and ideology in education, ed. Jerome Karabel, and Albert H. Halsey. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boyett, J.H., and J.T. Boyett. 1998. The guru guide™: The best ideas of the top management thinkers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T., D. Atkinson, and J. England. 2006. Regulatory discourses in education. A Lacanian perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerny, P.G. 1997. Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition 32(2): 252–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, M. 2012. The (absent) politics of neoliberal education policy. Critical Studies in Education 53(3): 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, D. 2000. Management fads and buzzwords. Critical-practical perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Courtney, S.J., and H.M. Gunter. 2015. Get off my bus! School leaders, vision work and the elimination of teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education 18(4): 395–417.Google Scholar
  14. Crainer, S. 1998. The ultimate business guru book: 50 thinkers who made management. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  15. Cranston, N. 2013. School leaders leading: Professional responsibility not accountability as the key focus. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 41(2): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danish Ministry of Education. 2013. Endnu bedre uddannelser—for unge og voksne. (Even better education—for young and adults). Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Darling-Hammond, L. and Rothman, R. (Eds.) (2011). Teacher and leader effectiveness in high-performing education systems. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education and Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.Google Scholar
  18. Drucker, P.F. 2006. The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Furedi, F. 2004. Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Furedi, F. 2009. Wasted. Why education isn’t educating. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, W.L., C.C. Cogliser, K.M. Davis, and M.P. Dickens. 2011. Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly 22: 1120–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gellis, Z.D. 2001. Social work perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership in health care. Social Work Research 25(1): 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimmet, P.P. 2015. Revisioning decision making in educational leadership. In Decision making in educational leadership: Principles, policies, and practices, ed. Stephanie Chitpin, and Colin W. Evers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gronn, P. 2003. The new work of educational leaders. Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Hammershøj, L.G. 2015. Diagnosis of the times vs description of society. Current Sociology Monograph 63(2): 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hattie, J.A.C. 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, A. 2005. Leading from the chalk-face: An overview of school leadership. Leadership 1(1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hay, I. 2006. Transformational leadership: Characteristics and criticisms. E-Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership 5(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
  29. Hood, C. 1991. A public management for all seasons? Public Administration 69: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopmann, S.T. 2008. No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies 40(4): 417–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jabbar, H. 2016. Between structure and agency: Contextualizing school leaders’ strategic responses to market pressures. American Journal of Education 122(3): 399–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kristensen, J.E. 2001. Den urene økonomiske fornuft. In Kritik af den økonomiske fornuft, ed. C. Fenger Grøn, and Jens Erik Kristensen. Hans Reitzels Forlag: København.Google Scholar
  33. Leithwood, K., et al. 2004. How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the learning from leadership project. New York: The Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Lewis, T.E. 2011. Rethinking the learning society: Giorgio Agamben on studying, stupidity, and impotence. Studies in Philosophy and Education 30(6): 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lundahl, L., I.E. Arreman, A.S. Holm, and U. Lundström. 2013. Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry 4(3): 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Masschelein, J., and M. Simons. 2013. In defence of the school: A public issue. Leuven: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, H.-D., and A. Aaron Benavot (eds.). 2013. PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, P., and N. Rose. 2008. Governing the present. Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  41. Mulford, B. 2003. School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. A paper commissioned by the Education and Training Policy Division, OECD, for the Activity Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/2635399.pdf.
  42. Parker, I. 1997. Psychoanalytic culture. Psychoanalytic discourse in western society. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Pattison, S. 1997. The faith of the managers: When management becomes religion. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  44. Peters, T.J., and R.H. Waterman. 1982. In search of excellence, lessons from America’s best-run companies. Cambridge: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  45. Power, M. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Power, M., T. Scheytt, K. Soin, and K. Sahlin. 2009. Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies 30(2&3): 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robinson, V.M.J., C.A. Lloyd, and K.J. Rowe. 2008. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly 44(5): 635–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosa, H. 2010. Alienation and acceleration. Towards a critical theory of late-modern temporality. Malmö: NSU Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rose, N. 1998. Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hansen, Rüsselbæk, and A. Qvortrup. 2013. Evaluerings- og synliggørelseskrav—undervisningskultur og lærerprofession. In Frihed og styring: En antologi om læringskulturer i forandring, ed. Steen Beck, and Dion Rüsselbæk Hansen. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  52. Rüsselbæk Hansen, D., S. Beck, and J.D. Bøje. 2014. What are they talking about? The construction of good teaching among students, teachers and management in the reformed Danish upper secondary school. Education Inquiry 5(4): 583–601.Google Scholar
  53. Rüsselbæk Hansen, D. and Frederiksen, L. F. 2015. Samtidens skoleledelse—tegn og tendenser i toneangivende ledelsesdiskurser. Gjallerhorn nr. 21. VIA University College.Google Scholar
  54. Rüsselbæk Hansen, D., A.M. Phelan, and A. Qvortrup. 2015. Teacher education in Canada and Denmark in an era of neutrality. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry 12: 40–55.Google Scholar
  55. Sadovnik, A. 2006. Toward a sociology of educational change: An application of Bernstein to the US “No Child Left Behind” Act. In Knowledge, power and educational reform: Applying the sociology of Basil Bernstein, ed. R. Moore, M. Arnot, J. Beck, and H. Daniels. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Scalia, J., and L. Scalia. 2011. Ideological critique and ethical leadership. Philosophical Studies in Education 42: 55–64.Google Scholar
  57. Scharmer, C.O. 2009. Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. Oakland: Berrett Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Schmidt, L.-H. 1999. Diagnosis I—Filosoferende eksperimenter. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidt, L.-H. 2002. Livsduelighed. In Kristendomskundskab/livsoplysning, ed. Lars-Henrik Schmidt, et al. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  60. Schmidt, L.-H. 2011. On respect. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Seery, A. 2008. Slavoj Zizek’s dialectics of ideology and the discourses of Irish education. Irish Educational Studies 27(2): 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simons, M., and J. Masschelein. 2007. The learning society and governmentality: An introduction. In The learning society from the perspective of governmentality, ed. Jan Masschelein, Maarten Simons, Ulrich Bröckling, and Ludwig Pongratz. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Taubman, P.M. 2009. Teaching by numbers. Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, C. 1992. Sources of the self: Making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Tooley, J. 1995. Markets or democracy for education? A reply to Stewart Ranson. British Journal of Educational Studies 43(1): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tosas, M.R. 2016. Educational leadership reconsidered: Arendt, Agamben, and Bauman. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35(4): 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Uljens, M., J. Møller, H. Ärlestig, and L.F. Frederiksen. 2013. The professionalization of Nordic school leadership. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership. Is there a Nordic model?, ed. L. Moos. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Vadolas, A. 2012. The bounced cheques of Neoliberal fantasy: Anxiety in times of economic crisis. Subjectivity 5(4): 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wall, T., and D. Perrin. 2015. Slavoj Zizek. A Zizekian gaze at education. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Yukl, G. 1999. An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zizek, S. 2000. The spectre of ideology. In Mapping ideology, ed. Slavoj Zizek. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  72. Zizek, S. 2006. The parallax view. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Zizek, S. 2008a. The sublime object of ideology. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  74. Zizek, S. 2008b. The plague of fantasies. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  75. Zizek, S. 2009. First as tragedy, then as farce. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department for the Study of Culture (Education)University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations