Undergoing, Mystery, and Half-Knowledge: John Dewey’s Disquieting Side
- 1.2k Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
In this article I argue that Dewey, throughout his work, conducted a systematic dismantling of the concept of rationality as mastery and control. Such a dismantling entails, at the same time, the dismantling of the auto-grounded subject, namely, the subject that grounds itself in the power to master experience. The Deweyan challenge to Western ontology goes straight to the core of the subject’s question. Dewey not only systematically challenged the understanding of thinking as a process consciously managed by the subject but also conceived of thinking as an event rather than a process—something that occurs in us rather than something intentionally staged by a reflective subject. Such a twofold dismantling of rationality and subject rather than a flow in a nihilistic/relativistic account of education results in a reinforcement of education that must be understood not so much as the attempt to understand and predict experience but as the means to create new, unpredictable experience. As a result, education, for Dewey, is grounded on, moved by, and directed at uncertainty. Education, in a sense, engenders uncertainty.
Keywords
Dewey Uncertainty Education Experience SubjectReferences
- Alexander, T.M. 1987. John Dewey’s theory of art, experience, and nature: The horizons of feelings. Albany: State of University New York Press.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, R.J. 2010. Pragmatism and hermeneutics. In John Dewey and the continental philosophy, ed. P. Farfield, 148–160. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, R.J. 1961. John Dewey’s metaphysics of experience. The Journal of Philosophy 58(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J. 1994. Pragmatism as a pedagogy of communicative action. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13: 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J. 2009a. How to use pragmatism pragmatically? E&C/Education & Culture 25(2): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J. 2009b. What is at stake in a pedagogy of interruption? In Philosophy of education: Modern and contemporary ideas at play, ed. T.E. Lewis, J.G.A. Grinberg, and M. Laverty, 785–807. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J. 2010. This is my truth, tell me yours’. Deconstructive pragmatism as a philosophy for education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42(7): 710–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J. (2012a). No education without hesitation: Exploring the limits of educational relations, In Philosophy of education (Ed. C.W. Ruitenberg), 1–13. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J. 2012b. Philosophy of education for the public good. Five challenges and an agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44(6): 581–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biesta, G.J.J., and N.C. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and educational research. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Boisvert, R.D. 1998. John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. 1978 [1967]. Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1882. The metaphysical assumptions of materialism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16: 208–213.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1929 [1897]. My pedagogic creed. Journal of the National Education Association 18(9): 291–295Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1900. The school and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1910. How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1930 [1916]. Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1917. The need for a recovery of philosophy. In Creative intelligence. Essays in the pragmatic attitude, ed. J. Dewey, et al., 3–69. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct. An introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1929 [1925]. Experience and nature. London: George Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1929. The quest for certainty: A study of the relation between knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1980 [1934]. Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. 1938. Logic. The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J., and A.F. Bentley. 1949. Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- English, A. 2013. Discontinuity in learning. Dewey, Herbart and education as transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrison, J. 1994. Realism, Deweyan pragmatism and educational research. Educational Researcher 23(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrison, J. 1996. A Deweyan theory of democratic listening. Educational Theory 46(4): 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrison, J. 1997. Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
- Garrison, J. 1998. Foucault, Dewey and self-creation. Educational Philosophy and Theory 30(2): 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrison, J. 1999. John Dewey’s theory of practical reasoning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 31(3): 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrison, J. 2003. Dewey, Derrida and the ‘Double Bind’. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35(3): 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garrison, J. 2005. A pragmatist conception of creative listening to emotional expressions in dialogues across differences. In Philosophy of Education, ed. K.R. Howe, 112–120. Illinois: Urbana.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. 1996 [1927]. Being and time. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Higgins, C. 2010. A question of experience: Dewey and Gadamer on practical wisdom. Journal of Philosophy of Education 44(2–3): 310–333.Google Scholar
- Jackson, P.W. 1994/1995. If we took Dewey’s aesthetics seriously, how would the arts be taught? Studies in philosophy and education 13: 193–202Google Scholar
- Johnston, J.S. 2002. John Dewey and the role of scientific method in aesthetic experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Margolis, J. 2010. Heidegger: A pragmatist by any means. In John Dewey and the continental philosophy, ed. P. Farfield, 111–125. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Rømer, T.A. 2012. Imagination and judgment in John Dewey’s philosophy: Intelligent transactions in a democratic context. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44(2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rømer, T.A. 2013. Nature, education and things. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32: 641–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rorty, R. 1976. Overcoming the tradition: Heidegger and Dewey. The Review of Metaphysics 30(2): 280–305.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, S.B. 2010. Science, nature, and philosophic foundations. In John Dewey and the continental philosophy, ed. P. Farfield, 126–147. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Saito, N. 2002. Pragmatism and the tragic sense: Deweyan growth in an age of nihilism. Journal of Philosophy of Education 36(2): 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saito, N. 2005. The gleam of light: Moral perfectionism and education in Dewey and Emerson. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Semetsky, I. 2003. Deleuze’s new image of thought, or Dewey revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35(1): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Semetsky, I. 2008. On the creative logic of education, or: Re-reading Dewey through the lens of complexity science. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(1): 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Toulmin, S. 1984. Introduction to John Dewey. In The later works, 1925–1953, vol. 4, ed. J.A. Boydston, vii–xxii. Carbondale: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Troutner, L.F. 1969. The confrontation between experimentalism and existentialism. From Dewey through Heidegger and beyond. Harvard Educational Review 39(1): 124–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Troutner, L.F. 1972. The Dewey–Heidegger comparison re-visited: A reply and clarification. Educational Theory 22(2): 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilshire, B. 1993. Body–mind and subconsciousness: Tragedy in Dewey’s life and work. In Philosophy and the reconstruction of culture, ed. J.J. Stuhr, 257–272. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar