Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 229–243 | Cite as

Freeing Teaching from Learning: Opening Up Existential Possibilities in Educational Relationships



In this paper I explore the relationship between teaching and learning. Whereas particularly in the English language the relationship between teaching and learning has become so intimate that it often looks as if ‘teaching and learning’ has become one word, I not only argue for the importance of keeping teaching and learning apart from each other, but also provide a number of arguments for suggesting that learning may not be the one and only option for teaching to aim for. I explore this idea through a discussion of the relationship between teaching and learning, both at a conceptual and at an existential level. I discuss the limitations of the language of learning as an educational language, point at the political work that is being done through the language of learning, and raise epistemological and existential questions about the identity of the learner, particularly with regard to the question what it means to be in and with the world in terms of learning as comprehension and sense making. Through this I seek to suggest that learning is only one possible aim for teaching and that the learner identity and the learning way of engaging with the world puts the learner in a very specific position vis-à-vis the world, one where the learner remains in the centre and the world appears as object for the learner’s acts of learning. That it is possible to teach without requesting from students that they learn, comprehend and make sense, is demonstrated through a brief account of a course in which students were explicitly asked to refrain from learning and were instead asked to adopt a concept. I show how this request opened up very different existential possibilities for the students and argue that if we value such existential possibilities, there may be good reasons for freeing teaching from learning.


Teaching Learning Studenting Being addressed Adoption Learnification 


  1. Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010a). Learner, student, speaker. Why it matters how we call those we teach. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(4), 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010b). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). The ignorant citizen: Mouffe, Rancière, and the subject of democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2012a). Giving teaching back to education Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology and Practice, 6(2), 35–49.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. J. J. (2012b). No education without hesitation. Thinking differently about educational relations. In C. Ruitenberg, et al. (Eds.), Philosophy of education 2012 (pp. 1–13). PES: Urbana-Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  7. Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Interrupting the politics of learning. Power and Education, 5(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. J. J. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Faure, E., et al. (1972). Learning to be. The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  11. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 37–49). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Field, J. (2000). Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, D. (2012). Continental divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hodkinson, Ph, Biesta, G. J. J., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ileris, K. (2008). Contemporary theories of learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Komisar, P. (1968). Teaching: Act and enterprise. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 6(2), 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levinas, E. (1978). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (trans: Lingis, A.). Dordrecht, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. MacMillan, C. J. B., & Nelson, T. (Eds.). (1968). Concepts of teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  19. Noddings, N. (2012). Philosophy of education (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  20. Peters, R. S. (1967). What is an educational process? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The concept of education (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  21. Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers, G. (1969). Freedom to learn. A view of what education might become. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  23. Roth, W.-M. (2011). Passability. At the limits of the constructivist metaphor. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  24. Ryle, G. (1952). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinsons.Google Scholar
  25. Yang, J., & Valdés-Cotera, R. (Eds.). (2011). Conceptual evolution and policy developments in lifelong learning. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Education and SocietyUniversity of LuxembourgWalferdangeLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations