Philosophical research tends to be done separately from empirical research, but this makes it difficult to tackle questions which require both. To make it easier to address these hybrid research questions, I argue that we should sometimes combine philosophical and empirical investigations. I start by describing a continuum of research methods from data collecting and analysing to philosophical arguing and conceptualising. Then, I outline one possible middle-ground position where research is equally philosophical and empirical: the Community of Inquiry reconceived as a research method. In this method, a group of participants (the community) engage in philosophical discussion and dialogue to answer the research question (the inquiry). I argue that this collaborative philosophical inquiry, moderated by a philosopher, provides a new method for collecting and testing data. The results are philosophical positions and arguments blended with empirical findings. Next, I illustrate how I used this philosophical–empirical method in a recent study to evaluate the strength of educational metaphors. I conclude that the Community of Inquiry is a viable means of combining philosophical and empirical research, and a new and worthwhile method for research in education.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
This study is described in full in a manuscript in preparation.
Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2003). Introduction. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the Philosophy of Education (pp. 1–17). Oxford: Blackwell.
Bufacchi, V. (2004). Empirical philosophy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(1), 39–53.
Burbules, N. C., & Warnick, B. R. (2006). Philosophical inquiry. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Complementary methods for research in education (3rd ed., pp. 489–502). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Carr, W. (2004). Philosophy and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(1), 55–73.
Carter, S. & Bartlett-Trafford, J. (2008). Who are we? Aotearoa New Zealand Tertiary Advisors talk about themselves, In E. Manalo, J. Bartlett-Trafford & S. Crozier (Eds.), Walking a Tightrope (pp. 39–61). Refereed proceedings of the 2007 Association of the Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa New Zealand Conference.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works, 1925–53, John Dewey (Vol. 12). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dohn, N. (2011). Roles of epistemology in investigating knowledge: “Philosophizing With”. Metaphilosophy, 42(4), 431–450.
Golding, C. (2008). Philosophical questions. In C. Tan (Ed.), Philosophical reflections for educators (pp. 193–204). Singapore: Cengage Learning.
Golding, C. (2009). That’s a better idea! philosophical progress and philosophy for children.Childhood and Philosophy, 5(10), 223–269.
Golding, C. (2011). A conception of philosophical progress. Essays in Philosophy, 12(2), 200–223.
Golding, C. (2012). Epistemic progress. Educational Theory, 62(6), 677–693.
Golding, C. (2013a). Must we gather data? A place for the philosophical study of higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(1), 152–155.
Golding, C. (2013b). The teacher as guide. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(1), 91–110.
Golding, C. (2013c). We made progress: Collective epistemic progress in dialogue without consensus. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(3), 423–440.
Hansson, S. O. (2008). Philosophy and other disciplines. Metaphilosophy, 39(4/5), 472–483.
Hartley, P., Hilsdon, J., Keenan, C., Sinfield, S., & Verity, M. (Eds.). (2011). Learning development in Higher Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mejia, A. (2008). My self-as philosopher and my self-as scientist meet to do research in the classroom. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(2/3), 161–171.
Nelson, L. (2004). (originally c.1922). The socratic method. In R. Saran & B. Neisser (Eds.), Enquiring minds (pp. 126–165). Sterling: Trentham Books.
Pardales, M., & Girod, M. (2006). Community of Inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 299–310.
Prinz, J. J. (2008). Empirical philosophy and experimental philosophy. In J. Knobe & S. Nicols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy (pp. 189–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Wortel, E., & Verweij, D. (2008). Inquiry, criticism and reasonableness: Socratic dialogue as a research method? Practical Philosophy, 9(2), 54–72.
About this article
Cite this article
Golding, C. The Community of Inquiry: Blending Philosophical and Empirical Research. Stud Philos Educ 34, 205–216 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9420-9
- Community of Inquiry
- Educational research
- Philosophical research
- Focus group