Skip to main content

The Community of Inquiry: Blending Philosophical and Empirical Research

Abstract

Philosophical research tends to be done separately from empirical research, but this makes it difficult to tackle questions which require both. To make it easier to address these hybrid research questions, I argue that we should sometimes combine philosophical and empirical investigations. I start by describing a continuum of research methods from data collecting and analysing to philosophical arguing and conceptualising. Then, I outline one possible middle-ground position where research is equally philosophical and empirical: the Community of Inquiry reconceived as a research method. In this method, a group of participants (the community) engage in philosophical discussion and dialogue to answer the research question (the inquiry). I argue that this collaborative philosophical inquiry, moderated by a philosopher, provides a new method for collecting and testing data. The results are philosophical positions and arguments blended with empirical findings. Next, I illustrate how I used this philosophical–empirical method in a recent study to evaluate the strength of educational metaphors. I conclude that the Community of Inquiry is a viable means of combining philosophical and empirical research, and a new and worthwhile method for research in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. Wortel and Verweij (2008) offer a similar dialogical research method based on Nelson’s Socratic Dialogue (Nelson 2004) rather than Lipman’s Philosophy for Children. However, they describe their method as empirical research rather than a philosophical-empirical hybrid.

  2. For more on guiding collaborative philosophical inquiry see Lipman (2003) and Golding (2012, 2013b, c).

  3. This study is described in full in a manuscript in preparation.

References

  • Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2003). Introduction. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the Philosophy of Education (pp. 1–17). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bufacchi, V. (2004). Empirical philosophy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C., & Warnick, B. R. (2006). Philosophical inquiry. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Complementary methods for research in education (3rd ed., pp. 489–502). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (2004). Philosophy and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. & Bartlett-Trafford, J. (2008). Who are we? Aotearoa New Zealand Tertiary Advisors talk about themselves, In E. Manalo, J. Bartlett-Trafford & S. Crozier (Eds.), Walking a Tightrope (pp. 39–61). Refereed proceedings of the 2007 Association of the Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa New Zealand Conference.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works, 1925–53, John Dewey (Vol. 12). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohn, N. (2011). Roles of epistemology in investigating knowledge: “Philosophizing With”. Metaphilosophy, 42(4), 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2008). Philosophical questions. In C. Tan (Ed.), Philosophical reflections for educators (pp. 193–204). Singapore: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2009). That’s a better idea! philosophical progress and philosophy for children.Childhood and Philosophy, 5(10), 223–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2011). A conception of philosophical progress. Essays in Philosophy, 12(2), 200–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2012). Epistemic progress. Educational Theory, 62(6), 677–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2013a). Must we gather data? A place for the philosophical study of higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(1), 152–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2013b). The teacher as guide. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(1), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, C. (2013c). We made progress: Collective epistemic progress in dialogue without consensus. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(3), 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O. (2008). Philosophy and other disciplines. Metaphilosophy, 39(4/5), 472–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, P., Hilsdon, J., Keenan, C., Sinfield, S., & Verity, M. (Eds.). (2011). Learning development in Higher Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia, A. (2008). My self-as philosopher and my self-as scientist meet to do research in the classroom. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(2/3), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. (2004). (originally c.1922). The socratic method. In R. Saran & B. Neisser (Eds.), Enquiring minds (pp. 126–165). Sterling: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardales, M., & Girod, M. (2006). Community of Inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. J. (2008). Empirical philosophy and experimental philosophy. In J. Knobe & S. Nicols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy (pp. 189–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

  • Wortel, E., & Verweij, D. (2008). Inquiry, criticism and reasonableness: Socratic dialogue as a research method? Practical Philosophy, 9(2), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clinton Golding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golding, C. The Community of Inquiry: Blending Philosophical and Empirical Research. Stud Philos Educ 34, 205–216 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9420-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9420-9

Keywords

  • Community of Inquiry
  • Methodology
  • Educational research
  • Philosophical research
  • Focus group