Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 117–134 | Cite as

Liberating Facts: Harman’s Objects and Wilber’s Holons

  • Sevket Benhur OralEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper, an account of two novel ontologies is given to point to the need to revise the status of facts in school curriculum. It is argued that schooling is in dire need of re-enchantment. The way to re-enchant schooling is to re-enliven the world we inhabit. We need to fall head over heels in love with the world again. In order to do that, we need to shake up our conception of “the hard and cold facts of the world” to make the latter come alive radiating vibrancy and luminosity out into the world. Facts have to be liberated from their “cold and hard” status and become things that captivate us with their uniqueness and dynamism. To the extent that facts enchant (instead of merely re/present the world), working with them leads to educative experience. To work out how to let the facts do that, two thinkers and two ways to reconceptualize ‘facts’ are discussed: Graham Harman and his objects, and Ken Wilber and his holons.

Keywords

Facts Re-enchantment Ken Wilber Holons Graham Harman Objects Object-oriented ontology 

References

  1. Apple. (2013). iPad Specs. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/.
  2. Bailey, R., Barrow, R., Carr, D., & McCarthy, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Sage handbook of philosophy of education. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G., & Osberg, D. (2007). Beyond re/presentation: A case for updating the epistemology of schooling. Interchange, 38, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boffey, D. (2013, February 16). Historians attack Michael Gove over ‘narrow’ curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/16/historians-michael-gove-curriculum.
  5. Esbjörn-Hargens, S. (2009). An overview of integral theory: An all-inclusive framework for the 21st century. Integral Institute, Resource Paper No. 1, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Gurwitsch, A. (1947). On the object of thought. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  9. Harman, G. (2007a). On vicarious causation. Collapse, 2, 187–221.Google Scholar
  10. Harman, G. (2007b). Heidegger explained: From phenomenon to thing. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  11. Harman, G. (2009). Zero-person and the psyche. In D. Skrbina (Ed.), Mind that abides: Panpsychism in the new millenium. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Harman, G. (2010). Time, space, essence, and eidos: A new theory of causation. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 6, 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Harman, G. (2011a). On the undermining of objects: Grant, Bruno, and radical philosophy. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek & G. Harman (Eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism. Melbourne: re.press.Google Scholar
  14. Harman, G. (2011b). The quadruple object. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  15. Harman, G. (2011c). The road to objects. Continent, 3, 171–179.Google Scholar
  16. Morton, T. (2011). Here comes everything: The promise of object-oriented ontology. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 19, 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of ‘strong’ emergence. Interchange, 38, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum: Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peters, M. A. (2002). Introduction. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education, and modernity (pp. 1–25). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Skrbina, D. (2009). Introduction. In D. Skrbina (Ed.), Mind that abides: Panpsychism in the new millenium. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walsh, R. (1995). The spirit of evolution. Retrieved from http://cogweb.ucla.edu/CogSci/Walsh_on_Wilber_95.html.
  24. Wilber, K. (1996). A brief history of everything. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Wilber, K. (2000a). A theory of everything. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Wilber, K. (2000b). Integral psychology. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Wilber, K. (2003). The kosmos trilogy vol. II excerpt A: An integral age at the leading edge. Retrieved from http://www.kenwilber.com/writings/read_pdf/83.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TED UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations