Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 641–652 | Cite as

Nature, Education and Things

  • Thomas Aastrup Rømer
Article

Abstract

In this essay it is argued that the educational philosophy of John Dewey gains in depth and importance by being related to his philosophy of nature, his metaphysics. The result is that any experiental process is situated inside an event, an existence, a thing, and I try to interpret this “thing” as schools or major cultural events such as the French revolution. This basic view is correlated to Dewey’s concept of transaction, of experience and finally, it is related to a discussion of methods in education.

Keywords

John Dewey Ontology Naturalism Transaction Method 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (2009). Nudità. Rome: Nottetempo.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, A. (2005). Metapolitics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Oxford: Rowman & Lilttlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Brinkmann, S. (2006). John Dewey—en introduktion. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  5. Criblez, B. S. (2000). John Dewey’s teaching methods in the discussion on German-language kindergartens—a case of non-perception? Studies in Philosophy and Education., 19, 1–2.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (2008). Experience and nature, John Dewey—the later works (Vol. 1). Illinois: Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1948). Knowing and the known. Illinois: Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. Elkjær, B. (2007). Når læring går på arbejde. København: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  11. Garret, R. (1972). The changing events I Dewey’s experience and nature. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10(4), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harman, G. (2002). Tool being—Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  13. Harman, G. (2005). Guerillametaphysic—phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (2001). The Thing, in Heidegger, M.: Poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper perennial.Google Scholar
  15. Hickman, L. A. (1998). Reading Dewey—interpretations for a postmodern generation. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Latour, B. (2004). Why has the critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 20(2), 222–248.Google Scholar
  17. Lehmann-Rommel, R. (2000). The renewal of Dewey—trends in the nineties. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 19, 1–2.Google Scholar
  18. Lyotard, J-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lyotard, J-F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Oelkers, J., & Rhyn, H. (Eds.) (2000). Studies in philosophy and education—Dewey and european education: General problems and case studies (Vol 19, nr. 1–2).Google Scholar
  21. Rasmussen, J. (2010). Increasing complexity by reducing complexity: A Luhmannian approach to learning. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.), Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Rockefeller, S. C. (1998). Dewey’s philosophy of religious experience. In L. A. Hickman (Ed.), Reading Dewey—interpretations for a postmodern generation. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rømer, T. A. (2010). Uddannelse i spænding [Education in Tension]. Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  24. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. Suffolk: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner—how professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Vanderstraeten, R. (2002). Dewey’s transactional constructivism. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(2), 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of AarhusAarhus NDenmark

Personalised recommendations