Skip to main content
Log in

Critical Pedagogy and Neoliberalism: Concerns with Teaching Self-Regulated Learning

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the educational psychology literature, self-regulated learning is associated with empowerment, agency, and democratic participation. Therefore, researchers are dedicated to developing and improving self-regulated learning pedagogy in order to make it widespread. However, drawing from the educational philosophy of Paulo Freire, teaching students to regulate their learning can be tied to a curriculum of obedience, subordination, and oppression. Using Freire’s discussion of concepts such as adaptation, prescription, and dependence, I suggest that self-regulated learning: (1) targets individual psychological changes that render individuals adaptable to existing social orders; (2) is guided by a logic to prescribe a certain kind of self; and (3) produces a relationship of dependence as learners depend on teachers for learning the necessary scripts to regulate their learning. This analysis points to ethical complexities related to teaching students to academically self-regulate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (1980). The other side of the hidden curriculum: Correspondence theories and the labor process. Interchange, 11, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2006). Understanding and interrupting neoliberalism and neoconservatism in education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, R., & Ayers, B. (2011). Living in the gutter: Conflict and contradiction in the neoliberal classroom: A call to action. Berkeley Review of Education, 2, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2010). A new logic of emancipation: The methodology of Jacques Rancière. Educational Theory, 60, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, J. M. (2011). “I need help!” Social class and children’s help-seeking in elementary school. American Sociological Review, 76, 862–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (2009). Teaching as an act of love: Reflections on Paulo Freire and his contributions to our lives and our work. In: A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed, pp. 567–578). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Education and experience. New York, NY: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts, A. (2011). From “Entrepreneur of the Self”to “Care of the Self”: Neo-liberal governmentality and Foucault’s ethics. Foucault Studies, 12, 130–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Andrade, J. (2010). To study is a revolutionary duty. In G. Goodman (Ed.), Educational psychology reader: The art and science of how people learn (pp. 165–178). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, C. (1999). Sentencing learners to life: Retrofitting the academy for the information age. Theory, Technology and Culture, 22, 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (2001). Educating flexible souls: The construction of subjectivity through developmentality and interaction. In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1987). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2009). Critical theory and educational practice. In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 27–51). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorlewski, J. (2011). Power, resistance, and literacy: Writing for social justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113, 240–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole, J., & Crozier, W. (2007). Dispositional and situational learning goals and children’s self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 773–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T., Mackenzie, J., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2000). Communal aspects of self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 275–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, D. (2010). Jean Piaget and the origins of intelligence: A return to “life itself.” In G. Goodman (Ed.), Educational psychology reader: The art and science of how people learn (pp. 130–148). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

  • Järvelä, S. (2011). How does help seeking help?—New prospects in a variety of contexts. Learning and Instruction, 21, 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journell, W. (2011). Teaching the 2008 presidential election at three demographically diverse schools: An exercise in neoliberal governmentality. Educational Studies, 47, 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusserow, A. (2004). American individualisms: Child rearing and social class in three neighborhoods. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakes, R. D., & Carter, P. A. (2011). Neoliberalism and education: An introduction. Educational Studies, 47, 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, R. T., Kardash, C. A. M., & Turner, S. (2002). Empowering students to become self-regulated learners. Professional School Counseling, 5, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2004). The educational inadequacy of conceptions of self in educational psychology. Interchange, 35, 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2007). The selves of educational psychology: Conceptions, contexts, and critical considerations. Educational Psychologist, 42, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & McLellan, A. M. (2008). The educational psychology of self-regulation: A conceptual and critical analysis. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 433–448. doi:10.1007/s11217-009-9173-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (2001). Is the self a kind of understanding? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Pons, M. (2002). Parental influences on children’s academic self-regulatory development. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaslin, M., & Burross, H. L. (2011). Research on individual differences within a sociocultural perspective: Co-regulation and adaptive learning. Teachers College Record, 113, 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools. An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (5th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2009). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 61–83). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., Heafner, T., & Massey, D. (2009). High-school teachers’ attempts to promote Self-regulated learning: “I may Learn from you, yet how do I do it. Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 4, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R. S. (2002). How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking. Theory into Practice, 41, 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Post, Y., Boyer, W., & Brett, L. (2006). A historical examination of self-regulation: Helping children now and in the future. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puustinen, M., Lyyra, A. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2008). Children’s help seeking: The role of parenting. Learning and Instruction, 18, 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2009). An education in awareness: Self, motivation, and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Associations Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (2000). Teaching freedom? Postmodern perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 70, 215–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (2008). Social class and social action: The middle-class bias of democratic theory in education. The Teachers College Record, 110, 405–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, J. (2011). Class reproduction by four year olds. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trend, D. (1994). Nationalities, pedagogies, and media. In H. A. Giroux & P. McLaren (Eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies (pp. 225–241). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (1994). Piaget before Piaget. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (2003). Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender and Education, 15, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2009). Paradoxical pathways: An ethnographic extension of Kohn’s findings on class and childrearing. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 680–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (2010). Self-regulated learning and the 21 st century competencies. http://www.hewlett.org/library/grantee-publication/self-regulated-learning-and-21st-century-competencies. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. E. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. E. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Vassallo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vassallo, S. Critical Pedagogy and Neoliberalism: Concerns with Teaching Self-Regulated Learning. Stud Philos Educ 32, 563–580 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9337-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9337-0

Keywords

Navigation