Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Education, Schooling, Derrida’s Marx and Democracy: Some Fundamental Questions

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beginning with a reconsideration of what the school is and has been, this paper explores the idea of the school to come. Emphasizing the governmental role of education in modernity, I offer a line of thinking that calls into question the assumption of both the school and education as possible conduits for either democracy or social justice. Drawing on Derrida’s spectral ontology I argue that any automatic correlation of education with democracy is misguided: especially within redemptive discourses that seek to liberate education from its present enclosure. This rereading of the field of education in the light of an account of the fundamental ontology of its key institution problematizes all rhetorics of education as social salvation. Education, it proposes, cannot be conceived as the ideal soul of a corrupted or as yet defective body, the school. Education—having taken on the character of an ontotheological principle—has become a governmental instrument as much as its specific institutions. This ontological condition can be understood within various accounts of the nature of contemporaneity. This paper considers the monstrous proposal that education be abandoned as the grounds for social, ethical and cultural redemption. The good news is that this abandonment opens the possibility for thinking beyond education, a beyond that is also beyond the strictures of instrumental rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and the curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1996). Cultural politics and education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2007). Global crises, social justice, and education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983). In the shadow of the silent majorities. New York: Semiotexte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Liquid modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsey, C. (2004). Culture and the real. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. (1998). Learning beyond the classroom. London: Routlege Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (2007). Educational research as a practical science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30(3), 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The information age. Volume I: The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F. (1999). Lifelong learning as social control. British Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1994). Spectres of marx. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1997). The politics of friendship. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2001). Writing and difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2005). Rogues. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2009). The beast and the sovereign. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., & Ferraris, M. (2001). A taste for the secret. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, J. (1992). Sentimental education. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. (1983). Countesthorpe College, Leicester. In B. Moon (Ed.), Comprehensive schools: Challenge and change. London: NFER Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, K., & Peim, N. (2012). Rethinking the improvement agenda. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Harmondsworth: Peguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillborn, D. (2008). Conspiracy? Racism and education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillborn, D., & Mirza, H. (2000). Educational inequality: Mapping race, class and gender. London: OfSTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1989). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. (2000). Education and social justice. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education. Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1991). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). Paris, capital of modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993). What is metaphysics? In D. Farrell Krell (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 93–110). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, P. (1989). The Victorian and Edwardian schoolchild. Gloucester: Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I. (1988). Culture and government. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain, 1944 to the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. (1997). Schooling and social change, 1964–1990. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R., & Seaborne, M. (1977). The English school: Its architecture and organization (Vol. 2). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1985). The postmodern condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. & Peim, N. (2011). Cross border education, who profits? JCEPS: The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(1), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2005). Capitalists and conquerors: Critical pedagogy against empire. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J. L. (2004). The inoperative community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, A. S. (1995). Summerhill school: A new view of childhood. In: A. Lamb (Ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.

  • Nussbaum, M. (1998). Cultivating humanity: Classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peim, N. (2001). The history of the present: Towards a contemporary phenomenology of the school. History of Education, 30(2), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peim, N. (2009). English and the government of language and culture. In D. Hill & L. Helavaara Robertson (Eds.), Equality in the primary school: Promoting good practice across the curriculum. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peim, N., & Flint, K. (2009). Testing times: Questions concerning assessment for school improvement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(3), 342–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S., Martin, J., & Nixon, J. (1997). A learning democracy for cooperative action. Oxford Review of Education, 23(1), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. E., & Gibson, R. (Eds.). (2007). Neoliberalism and education reform. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (2007). Education and theory. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. (2005). Deconstruction and democracy. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J. (Ed.). (1977). The Countesthorpe experience. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1994). Weber: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Peim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peim, N. Education, Schooling, Derrida’s Marx and Democracy: Some Fundamental Questions. Stud Philos Educ 32, 171–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9300-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9300-0

Keywords

Navigation