Skip to main content
Log in

Whole School Meetings and the Development of Radical Democratic Community

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Serious re-examination of participatory traditions of democracy is long overdue. Iconically central to such traditions of democratic education is the practice of whole School Meetings. More usually associated with radical work within the private sector, School Meetings are here explored in detail through two examples from publicly funded education, (1) Epping House School, a mixed residential primary/elementary school for students with severe emotional, social and behavioural difficulties and (2) secondary/high schools within the Just Community School movement in the USA. In addition to providing richly textured accounts of the multiple realities and challenges of pioneering overtly democratic practices such as School Meetings within the publicly funded sector of education substantial attention is paid to analytic engagement with the kind of organisational structures, practices and cultures that seem to play an important role in their successful operation and development. The different phenomenological and theoretical strands weaving their way through the texture of Meeting practices also raise a number of key issues within the fields of social and political philosophy, in particular, whether School Meetings are best understood as predominantly political or communal phenomena. In gesturing towards the philosophical groundwork of a satisfactory answer I argue for the importance of the undeservedly neglected notion of democratic fellowship within the lexicon of democratic polity and aspiration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I dedicate this paper to the late Tony Weaver, friend, conscientious objector, founder member of the Committee of 100, anarchist, one time Editor of New Era, and quiet, patient pioneer of radical education.

  2. My thanks to Maurice Bridgeland, Pat Daunt, Frank Kirkpatrick, Bryn Purdy, Richard Read and Alan Scrivener for disagreements, delights and suggestions for improvement on earlier versions of this paper. My thanks too, to Helen Lees, for inviting my participation in this Special Issue.

References

  • BBC TV (1968) Special children—special teaching. Transcript of BBC1 Television Broadcast 5th March, 1967 Id No. 19, May 11–16.

  • Case, H. (1966). A therapeutic discipline for living. New Era, 47(7), 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, H. (1978). Loving us: A new way of education. Privately published [copy held by London University Institute of Education Library, Classmark zz SA6390].

  • Fielding, M. (1973). Democracy in Secondary Schools: School Councils and ‘Shared Responsibility’. Journal of Moral Education, 2(3), 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (1999). Radical collegiality: Affirming teaching as an inclusive professional practice. Australian Educational Researcher, 26(2), 1–34. August.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2000). Education policy and the challenge of living Philosophy. Journal of Education Policy, 15(4), 377–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2007). The Human Cost and Intellectual Poverty of High Performance Schooling: radical philosophy, John Macmurray and the remaking of person-centred education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(4), 383–409. July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1997). Revisiting ‘Social Amnesia’. Society, 35(1), 58–60. November–December.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education. In C. M. Beck, B. S. Crittenden, & E. U. Sullivan (Eds.), Moral education: Interdisciplinary approaches. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1980). High School Democracy and Educating for a Just Society. In R. Mosher (Ed.), Moral education: A first generation of research and development (pp. 20–57). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyward, G. A. (1948). In Conclusion. In New education fellowship (ed). Problems of child development: A contribution to the understanding of children’s needs (pp. 93–94). London: New Education Fellowship.

  • Macmurray, J. (1932). Review of ‘philosophy & the ordinary man’. Philosophy, VII, 334–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmurray, J. (1935). The Nature of Philosophy. In J. M. Murry, J. Macmurray, N. A. Holdaway, & G. D. H. Cole (Eds.), Marxism (pp. 27–42). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmurray, J. (1943). Constructive democracy. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmurray, J. (1950). Conditions of freedom. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmurray, J. (1957). The self as agent. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmurray, J. (1961). Persons in relation. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, R. (1980). A democratic high school: Coming of age. In R. Mosher (Ed.), Moral education: A first generation of research and development (pp. 279–302). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, A. S. (1964). Review of ‘Homer lane’ by W. David Wills Id No. 13, July, 19–21.

  • Oser, F., Althof, W., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2008). The just community approach to moral education: System change or individual change? Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 395–415. September.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). The Habit of the Common Life: Building Character Through Democratic Community Schools. In L. P. Nucci (Ed.), Moral development and character education: A dialogue (pp. 125–143). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, B. (1965). Epping house school—A study in the treatment of juvenile maladjustment. Id, 15, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, J., & Power, C. (1980). Educating for Democratic Community: Some Unresolved Dilemmas. In R. Mosher (Ed.), Moral education: A first generation of research and development (pp. 303–320). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, G. (1970). Their bomb disposal school. Guardian, Wednesday 21st January, 9.

  • Wasserman, E. (1980). An Alternative High School based on Kohlberg’s Just Community Approach to Education. In R. Mosher (Ed.), Moral education: A first generation of research and development (pp. 265–278). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, A. (1989). Democratic Practice in Education; an Historical Perspective. In C. Harber & R. Meighan (Eds.), The democratic school: Educational management and the practice of democracy (pp. 83–91). Ticknall: Education Now.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, W. D. (1948). Shared responsibility. In New Education Fellowship (ed) Problems of child development: A contribution to the understanding of children’s needs (79–83). London: New Education Fellowship.

  • Wills, W. D. (1966). Persuasive discipline. War Resistance, 2(18–19), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, W. D. (1970). Symposium on shared responsibility: An introduction. Therapeutic Education, Autumn, 20–22.

  • Wrigley, T. (2006). Another school is possible. Bookmarks: London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Fielding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fielding, M. Whole School Meetings and the Development of Radical Democratic Community. Stud Philos Educ 32, 123–140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9208-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9208-5

Keywords

Navigation