Skip to main content
Log in

Deliberative Democracy, Critical Rationality and Social Memory: Theoretical Resources of an ‘Education for Discourse’

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article brings interconnects three debates to show what this might imply for the ‘redemocratisation’ of UK society and for pedagogical reform. One debate concerns deliberative types of democratic reform, arguing in favour of a ‘creative agnosticism’ towards the two philosophical frameworks which dominate this literature. This leads into a discussion of education and critical rationality, arguing for an aptitude-based account of moral agency, one which relates to the sociocultural resources we inherit from the past. The final debate therefore concerns social memory. I do not offer a theory of social memory but critique various commentators in arguing for what I call a ‘multipolar analysis’. This both describes the analytical method adopted in this article and the skills and capacities which a system based upon ‘education for discourse’ would need to facilitate. The article therefore proposes that democracy, education and memory—deliberativeness, critical rationality and social remembering—be brought closer together for the mutual benefit of each debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For my purposes no significant distinction between the ‘social’ and the ‘collective’ need be made.

  2. For an account of such a politics, see self-citation.

References

  • Ackerman, B., & Fishkin, J. (2003). Deliberation day. In J. Fishkin & P. Laslett (Eds.), Debating deliberative democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamczyk, A. (2002). On thanksgiving and collective memory, constructing the american tradition. Journal of Historical Sociology, 15(3), 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, D. (2003). Street names and the scaling of memory, the politics of commemorating Martin Luther King, Jr within the African American Community. Area, 35(2), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Power, participation and political renewal. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Purchase education and the democratic person: Towards a political conception of democratic education. Teachers College Record, 109, 740–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, J. (2008). The moral demands of memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, W. (2006). Communities of memory. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Zizek, S. (2000). Contingency hegemony universality. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuypers, S. (2004). Critical thinking, autonomy and practical reason. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, M., & Mentzel, M. (2001). Policy and science, options for democratisation in European countries. Science and Public Policy, 28(6), 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dengen, C. (2005). Relationality, place, and absence: A three-dimensional perspective on social memory. Sociological Review, 53, 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De-Shalit, A. (2004). Political philosophy and empowering citizens. Political Studies, 52, 802–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, T. (2000). Rethinking democracy and education, towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enslin, P., Pendlebury, S., & Tjiattas, M. (2001). Deliberative democracy, diversity and the challenges of citizenship education. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 35(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J. (1997). The voice of the people. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J., & Laslett, P. (Eds.). (2003). Debating deliberative democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition?. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. (2004). Liberal pluralism, a reply to Talisse. Contemporary Political Theory, 3(2), 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (1999). Dangerous dualisms in Siegals theory of critical thinking, a Deweyian pragmatist responds. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(2), 212–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, T. (2002). Where now for new labour?. Polity: Polity Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (2008). Innovating democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R., & Hicks, D. (2005). Lost convictions. Cultural Studies, 19(1), 100–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C., Munton, R., & Collins, K. (2004). Experimental discursive spaces, policy processes, public participation and the greater London authority. Urban Studies, 41(4), 903–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, F., & Winch, C. (2004). The role of critique in philosophy of education, its subject matter and its ambiguities. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelscher, S., & Alderman, D. (2004). Memory and place, geographies of a critical relationship. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(3), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansteiner, W. (2002). Finding meaning in memory, a methodological critique of collective memory studies. History & Theory, 41, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, A. (1982). After virtue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (2002). The ethics of memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I. (2003). Adult education, lifelong learning and citizenship, some ifs and buts. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(6), 566–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of social remembering. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. (2003). Monuments, memorials, and the politics of memory. Urban Geography, 24(5), 442–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murris, K. (2000). Can children do philosophy? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanz, P., & De La Porte, C. (2004). The OMC—a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. (2007). The politics of regret. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S. (2000). The politics of inclusive agreements, towards a critical discourse theory of democracy. Political Studies, 48, 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, S. (1998). Marxism and history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saward, M. (2003). Enacting democracy. Political Studies, 51, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schou, L. (2001). Democracy in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20(4), 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, H. (1988). Educating reason. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2005). Lifelong learning and the labour governments 1997–2004. Oxford Review of Education, 31, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2004). What are the bounds of critical rationality in education? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H., Norval, A., Landman, T., & Pretty, J. (2003). Open citizens juries and the politics of sustainability. Political Studies, 51, 282–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welton, M. (2001). Civil society and the public sphere, Habermas’s recent learning theory. Studies in the Education of Adults, 33(1), 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, J. (2005). “Some people even died”, Martin Luther Kink Jr, the civil rights movement and the politics of remembrance in elementary classrooms. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(1), 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (2004). Developing critical rationality as a pedagogical aim. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (2003). Time maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, I. (2003). A greener alternative? Deliberative democracy meets local government. Environmental Politics, 12(2), 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Fitzpatrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fitzpatrick, T. Deliberative Democracy, Critical Rationality and Social Memory: Theoretical Resources of an ‘Education for Discourse’. Stud Philos Educ 28, 313–327 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9121-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9121-3

Keywords

Navigation